Excision of breast fibroepithelial lesions: when is it still necessary?-A 10-year review of a regional centre.

PURPOSE: Fibroepithelial lesions (FEL) range from benign fibroadenoma (FA) to malignant phyllodes tumor (PT), but can be difficult to diagnose on core needle biopsy (CNB). This study assesses risk factors for phyllodes tumor (PT) and recurrence and whether a policy to excise FELs over 3 cm in size is justified. METHODS: Patients having surgery for FELs from 2009 to 2018 were identified. The association of clinical, radiology and pathological features with PT and recurrence were evaluated. Trend analysis was used to assess risk of PT based on imaging size. RESULTS: Of the 616 patients with FELs, 400 were identified as having FA on CNB and 216 were identified as having FEL with a comment of concern for phyllodes tumor (query PT, QPT). PT was identified in 107 cases; 28 had CNB of FA (7.0%), while 79 had QPT (36.6%). Follow-up was available for 86 with a mean of 56 months; six patients had recurrence of PT, all of whom had QPT on CNB. The finding of PT was associated with CNB of QPT, increasing age and size on multivariate logistic regression. All patients diagnosed with PT following CNB of FA had enlarging lesions with a mean size of 38.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Our data does not support routine excision of FELs based on size alone. All patients with QPT on CNB, regardless of size should consider excision due to high risk of PT and recurrence, and the decision to excise FAs to rule out PT should also consider whether the lesion is enlarging.

Development and Prospective Validation of a Risk Calculator That Predicts a Low Risk Cohort for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Upstaging to Malignancy: Evidence for a Watch and Wait Strategy of a High-Risk Lesion.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend surgical excision of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) due to the concern of undersampling a potential malignancy on core needle biopsy (CNB). The purpose of this study was to determine clinical, radiological and pathological variables associated with ADH upstaging to cancer and to develop a predictive risk calculator capable of identifying women who have a low oncological risk of upstaging. METHODS: A prospectively collected database from a tertiary breast referral center was analyzed for women diagnosed with ADH on CNB between January 2013 to December 2017 who underwent surgical excision. CNB and surgical pathology reports were examined to determine rate of upstaging. The association between clinical, radiological and pathological variables were evaluated using regression analysis to determine predictors of ADH upstaging to cancer. Significant variables (p ≤ 0.05) identified on univariate analysis were assigned a score of "1" and were included in the ADH upstaging risk calculator. RESULTS: A total of 1986 patients underwent surgery for a high-risk lesion. We identified 318 (16.0%) patients who had ADH identified on their CNB who underwent surgery-of which 290 were included in our study. The upstage rate was 24.8%. Five variables were associated with upstaging and included in our calculator: (1) lesion > 5 mm on ultrasound; (2) lesion > 5 mm on mammogram; (3) one or more "high-risk" lesion(s) on CNB; (4) pathological suspicion for cancer and; (5) incomplete removal of calcifications on CNB. Patients with a score of 0 had a 2% risk of being upstaged to cancer and were deemed low risk with 17.2% of patients falling within this category. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ADH on CNB can be stratified into a low oncological cohort who have a 2% risk of being upstaged to carcinoma. In the future, these select patients may be counselled and potentially offered observation as an alternative to surgery.

Is microductectomy still necessary to diagnose breast cancer: a 10-year study on the effectiveness of duct excision and galactography.

PURPOSE: Patients with spontaneous nipple discharge (SND) who have neither clinically palpable masses nor evidence of disease on imaging with mammogram and/or ultrasound are traditionally investigated with galactogram and duct excision. As breast imaging improves, it has raised the question whether galactography and microductectomy are necessary to diagnose breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of malignancy in patients presenting with SND who underwent microductectomy and to evaluate the utility of duct excision and galactography in patients whose initial clinical and radiological evaluation were negative. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective study was conducted in British Columbia's largest tertiary breast referral center examining the clinical, radiological and pathological results for all patients who underwent a microductectomy procedure for SND between 2008 and 2017. RESULTS: A total of 231 microductectomies were performed and the overall incidence of malignancy was 13% (n = 32). Following initial work up, 155 patients (67%) had only discharge on exam and no radiologically suspicious findings of malignant disease. Of these patients, 14% (n = 21) were diagnosed with cancer by duct excision. Galactography yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 63% and 36%, respectively (PPV 15% and NPV 85%). Lastly, we found that 3% of patients (n = 8) initially diagnosed with benign disease later developed breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SND should continue to be evaluated with microductectomy to prevent missing a breast cancer. Moreover, we do not recommend performing galactography for diagnosing breast cancer due to poor sensitivity and specificity though it may assist in preoperative planning.

Axillary reverse mapping in breast cancer: a Canadian experience.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the axillary reverse lymphatic mapping (ARM) procedure for reducing the risk of arm lymphedema after breast cancer surgery. METHODS: The ARM procedure was carried out with a subareolar injection of technetium-99 sulfur colloid the morning of surgery, and a patent blue dye injection into the upper inner arm after anesthesia. RESULTS: Fifty-two women made up our study population. Thirty-seven patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and 15 patients underwent an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for known nodal metastasis. The sentinel lymph node was identified in 36 of the 37 cases who underwent SLNB alone and in 12 of 15 patients who underwent on ALND. In 13 patients, both blue and radioactive lymph nodes or lymphatics were clearly identified (25%) and 5 patients had a clear crossover with nodes being both blue and hot. Only a single patient with crossover lymphatics had metastases present in their sentinel node. CONCLUSION: The ARM technique did not prevent identification of the SLN and we identified much greater crossover than reported. We had a single patient, who underwent a sentinel node biopsy, with mild arm lymphedema (1.9%) after 2 years of follow up.

Measurements using mammography and ultrasonography underestimate the size of high-volume ductal carcinoma in situ.

BACKGROUND: Surgical decisions for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are based on lesion sizes. This study aims to determine the accuracy of pre-operative imaging in estimating the size of DCIS. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of clinicopathologic data of patients treated for DCIS with breast conserving surgery (BCS) between 2012 and 2018. Mammographic and sonographic lesion sizes were compared with final pathology sizes. RESULTS: For the 152 lesions visible on mammography, mean size on imaging was significantly smaller when compared to final pathology (2.3 vs. 3.6 cm, p < 0.001). The mean difference of 1.3 cm was a significant underestimation with a correlation coefficient of 0.367 (p < 0.001). For 48 sonographically visible lesions, the radiologic size was significantly smaller than pathologic size (1.7 vs. 4.1 cm, p < 0.001), but the degree of underestimation was not significantly correlated (p = 0.379). CONCLUSION: DCIS size was significantly underestimated by imaging. This must be taken into consideration during surgical planning.

Pure flat epithelial atypia identified on core needle biopsy does not require excision.

BACKGROUND: Routine excision of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) of the breast found on core needle biopsy (CNB) is being questioned and a policy of selective excision of FEA was adopted in our area. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the upstage rate to malignancy across multiple diagnostic centers in our area following the policy of selective excision and to identify factors predictive of malignancy. METHODS: Patients having excision of CNB FEA at our regional Hospital between 2013 and 2017 were identified. The primary endpoint was upstage to malignancy after excision. We also assessed for clinical, radiological, and pathological features associated with malignancy. RESULTS: We identified 187 patients. Eighty-nine had pure FEA, 71 had concurrent ADH, and 18 had other pathological lesions. Following surgical excision, 9 patients were upstaged to malignancy (4. 8%) with 8 having concurrent ADH (2 invasive ductal carcinoma, 6 DCIS) and 1 with concurrent Complex Sclerosing Lesion (DCIS). None of the pure FEA cases upstaged. The presence of ADH or CSL in the CNB were the only factors found to be predictive of upstaging (p = 0.001, p = 0.0001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The upstage rate to malignancy after excision of pure FEA at out center is 0%. Therefore, we recommend that pure FEA with radiology and pathology concordance does not require surgical excision and can instead be followed with serial imaging. However, patients with FEA in association with other high-risk lesions should be managed as per indicated for the other high-risk lesion and FEA with ADH should be excised.

Routine shave margins are not necessary in early stage breast cancer treated with Breast Conserving Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) is considered standard of care for women with early stage breast cancer. Between 20 and 50% of women treated with BCS will require re-operation for positive or close margins and it has been suggested that routine cavity shave margins may reduce the frequency of positive margins. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of a prospectively maintained surgical database of patients undergoing BCS for early stage breast cancer, at a single institution, between January 2012 and December 2015. Cohort was followed until June 2016 to capture re-operations. RESULTS: Among 2096 patients with stage 0-III breast cancers, 872 (42%) underwent primary mastectomies and 1224 (58%) underwent primary BCS. Margins were positive in 128 (11%) and close in 442 (36%). Re-operation rate for patients after BCS was 19%. CONCLUSION: A lower than predicted positive margin rate suggests that routine shave margins are not warranted at our institution.

Reduced Time to Breast Cancer Diagnosis with Coordination of Radiological and Clinical Care.

Introduction Diagnostic delays for breast problems is a current concern in British Columbia and diagnostic pathways for breast cancer are currently under review. Breast centres have been introduced in Europe and reported to facilitate diagnosis and treatment. Guidelines for breast centers are outlined by the European Society for Mastology (EUSOMA). A Rapid Access Breast Clinic (RABC) was developed at our hospital applying the concept of triple evaluation for all patients and navigation between clinicians and radiologists. We hypothesize that the Rapid Access Breast Clinic will decrease wait times to diagnosis and minimize duplication of services compared to usual care. Methods A retrospective review was undertaken looking at diagnostic wait times and the number of diagnostic centres involved for consecutive patients seen by breast surgeons with diagnostic workups performed either in the traditional system (TS) or the RABC. Only patients presenting with a new breast problem were included in the study. Results Patients seen at the RABC had a decreased time to surgical consultation (33 vs 86 days, p<0.0001) for both malignant (36 vs 59 days, p=0.0007) and benign diagnoses (31 vs 95 days, p<0.0001). Furthermore, 13% of the patients referred to the surgeon in the TS without a diagnosis were eventually diagnosed with a malignancy and waited a mean of 84 days for initial surgical assessment. Of the patients seen at the RABC, 5% required investigation at more than one institution compared to 39% patients seen in the TS (p<0.0001). Cancer patients had a shorter time from presentation to surgery in the RABC (64 vs 92 days, p=0.009). Conclusion The establishment of the RABC has significantly reduced the time to surgical consultation, time to breast cancer surgery, and duplication of investigations for patients with benign and malignant breast complaints. It is feasible to introduce a EUSOMA-based breast clinic in the Canadian Health Care System and improvements in diagnostic wait times are seen. We recommend the expansion of coordinated care to other sites.