Myeloid Sarcoma: Diagnostic and Treatment Tools from a Monocentric Retrospective Experience.

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a very rare disease in both adults and children. Prognosis is poor in adults; in the pediatric age, the prognostic impact of extramedullary disease is controversial. Systemic therapy represents the mainstay of treatment even in isolated MS, but a comparison between different induction regimens is very limited in the literature. To date, it is still not clear if induction treatment should differ from that of other acute myeloid leukemias and stem cell transplant is considered for consolidation in both leukemic patients and in those with isolated disease. Our study describes a retrospective series of 13 cases of MS (adults and children), diagnosed and treated at our institute over 18 years. We report the results of immunophenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular studies, therapeutic approaches, and outcome, in order to establish the best strategy for patients' workup.

Real-life comparison of nilotinib versus dasatinib as second-line therapy in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the backbone of treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients (CP-CML), have changed the long-term outcome of the disease. Nonetheless, over 20% of patients fail front-line therapy due to intolerance or resistance. A head-to-head comparison of dasatinib and nilotinib as second-line treatment outside of sponsored clinical trials has not been reported. We retrospectively analyzed 131 CP-CML patients who, after front-line imatinib failure, switched to a second-line therapy with nilotinib (59, 45%) or dasatinib (72, 55%). Median duration of second-line treatment was 33 months (range 2-100). The reason for switching therapy was resistance in 83.2% and intolerance in 16.8% of patients. The overall survival of the entire cohort at 7 years was 78.9%, while it was 72% and 85.6% for patients treated with dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively (p=0.287). With regard to efficacy after 12 months of treatment, 108 patients were evaluable for molecular response: 47% achieved a major molecular response and 18.2% a deep molecular response with dasatinib, compared to 38% and 16.2% with nilotinib (p=ns). We observed 35% of grade 3-4 adverse events, more frequently in the dasatinib group (47%) compared to the nilotinib group (22%), without affecting molecular responses. Our study suggests that, in the real-life setting, dasatinib and nilotinib used as second-line treatment in CP-CML are equally effective, with high molecular response rates and an acceptable tolerability.

Risk-adapted treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia: results from the International Consortium for Childhood APL.

Pediatric acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) can be cured with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracycline. However, most published trials have employed high cumulative doses of anthracyclines. Here, we report the outcome of newly diagnosed APL patients enrolled in the International Consortium for Childhood APL (ICC-APL-01) trial, which reduced anthracycline exposure but extended that of ATRA. The study recruited 258 children/adolescents with molecularly/cytogenetically proven APL. Patients were stratified into standard-risk (SR) and high-risk (HR) groups according to baseline white blood cell counts (<10 × 109/L or ≥10 × 109/L); both groups received identical induction treatment with ATRA and 3 doses of idarubicin. Two or 3 blocks of consolidation therapy were administered to SR and HR patients, respectively, while maintenance therapy with low-dose chemotherapy and ATRA cycles was given to all patients for 2 years. The cumulative dose of daunorubicin equivalent anthracyclines in SR and HR patients was lower than that of previous studies (355 mg/m2 and 405 mg/m2, respectively). Hematologic remission was obtained in 97% of patients; 8 children died of intracranial hemorrhage in the first 2 weeks following diagnosis. Five-year overall and event-free survival for the whole cohort were 94.6% and 79.9%, respectively; they were 98.4% and 89.4% in SR patients and 84.3% and 74.2% in HR patients (P = .002 and P = .043, respectively). These data demonstrate that extended use of ATRA coupled to a risk-adapted consolidation can achieve high cure rates in childhood APL and limit anthracycline exposure. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as EudractCT 2008-002311-40.

Predictive factors for response and survival in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with hypomethylating agents: a real-life experience.

Predictive factors of response to hypomethylating agents (HMA) in elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients remain unclear in the real-life setting and no direct comparison between azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) has been carried out. We retrospectively evaluated 110 AML patients treated with HMA (78 AZA, 32 DEC) as first-line therapy outside of clinical trials. Median age was 75 years (range 58-87). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 8.0 months (95% CI 6.1-10), without significant differences among the subgroups: AZA 8.8 months vs DEC 6.3 months (p = 0.291). HMA treatment yielded an overall response rate (ORR) of 40% (AZA 37% vs DEC 47%, p = 0.237). A stable disease (SD) after 4 HMA cycles was not associated with a worse survival outcome compared with an early optimal response. Factors independently associated with a better OS were transfusion independence during treatment (p = 0.049), achievement of an optimal response to treatment (p < 0.001), and a baseline hemoglobin level ≥ 9.25 (p = 0.018). A bone marrow (BM) blast count ≥ 30% (p < 0.001) and a therapy-related AML (p = 0.008) remain poor survival predictors. Of the available biologic features, an adverse risk category according to the ELN classification was significantly associated with a shorter survival over the intermediate risk category (p = 0.034). Disease progression remains the primary cause of death. Infectious complications were more severe (p = 0.036) and occurred earlier (p = 0.006) in the DEC group compared with that of the AZA group. In conclusion, clinical prognostic factors associated to response and survival have been identified without significant associations concerning overall outcomes between the two HMAs.

Switch from branded to generic imatinib: impact on molecular responses and safety in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Since July 2017, different generic imatinib formulations have been introduced in Italy for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We analyzed 168 chronic phase CML patients treated with branded imatinib for a median of 12 years (range 1-16) at a single institution who switched to a single generic formulation in order to assess the safety and impact on molecular response. The Sokal risk was low/intermediate/high in 63%, 33%, and 4% of patients, respectively. The median duration of generic imatinib treatment was 19 months (range 4-22). Twenty-seven percent of patients were in MMR and 73% were in deep molecular responses (MR4-4.5) at the time of the switch. After 12 months of treatment with generic imatinib, 140 patients were evaluable for response: 23.6% and 76.4% were respectively in MMR and in deep molecular response. When the degree of response was compared with the best molecular response observed with branded imatinib, it was found that 84% of patients maintained the response previously achieved, 6% improved it, and 10% of patients had a molecular fluctuation from the previous deep molecular response to MMR. Only 1 patient lost the MMR and no patient switched to another TKI for inefficacy. In terms of safety, 20% of patients reported new or worsening side effects, but only 2 patients returned to branded imatinib for toxicity. Our data show that the switch to generic imatinib in patients who have been previously treated with branded imatinib appears to maintain efficacy, although a proportion of patients experience new or worsening side effects.

Ten-year outcome of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib in real life.

Imatinib, the first BCR/ABL kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), has changed the long-term outcome of patients affected by this disease. The aim of our analysis was to report, after a median follow-up of 10.2 years (range 5.8-14.8), the long-term outcome, efficacy, and safety of imatinib treatment (frontline and after interferon failure) in a single institution cohort of 459 patients with CML in chronic phase treated outside of clinical trials. The 10-year overall survival of the whole cohort was 77.1%, while the 10-year probability of dying due to CML and other causes was 7.8% and 16%, respectively. The prognostic value of the BCR-ABL1 ratio at 3 months (⩽ 10%) and of complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response at 1 year was confirmed also in the real-life practice. The EUTOS long-term survival score better stratified the baseline risk of dying of CML compared with other risk scores. Two hundred thirty-six (51.4%) patients achieved a deep molecular response during imatinib treatment after a median time of 4.57 years, and 95 (20.6%) had a stable deep molecular response maintained for at least 2 consecutive years. Imatinib was associated with a low rate of serious cardiovascular events and second neoplasia. This 10-year real-life follow-up study shows that imatinib maintains efficacy over time and that long-term administration of imatinib is not associated with notable cumulative or late toxic effects.

Prolonged treatment with arsenic trioxide (ATO) and all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) for relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia previously treated with ATRA and chemotherapy.

Prolonged therapy with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) is highly effective in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) but there is limited data on the efficacy of this regimen in the relapse setting. We report here on 22 APL patients treated with prolonged ATRA-ATO therapy at the time of disease relapse. Twenty patients obtained molecular complete remission (CRm) after 2 cycles (90%). Of these, two patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) while the remaining proceeded to receive additional cycles (up to a total of 5) of ATRA-ATO. With a median follow-up of 58 months from the time of relapse (range: 21-128 months), the 4-year OS probability was 0.85 (95% CI 0.61-0.94), DFS was 0.74 (95% CI 0.49-0.88), and EFS 0.68 (95% CI 0.45-0.83). Two patients were resistant to ATRA-ATO salvage and five relapsed at a median of 19 months. Of these, four died due to progressive disease while three relapsed achieved a new CRm after further salvage therapy. This experience confirms the potentially curative effect of prolonged ATRA-ATO therapy in relapsed APL, especially in patients with long first complete remission.

Clinical results according to age in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving imatinib frontline: The younger, the later, the worse?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate differences in clinical results according to age among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). METHODS: 207 consecutive CML patients treated with imatinib frontline were revised, dividing them in young adults (>20 < 45 years) (YA), middle-aged adults (≥45 < 65 years) (MA) and elderly (≥65 years) (EL). RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMolR) were significantly higher in MA compared with YA and EL (P < .001 for CCyR and P = .001 for MMolR). Number of total events was lower in MA (8 [11.1%] vs 21 [34.4%] in YA and 28 [37.8%] in EL, P = .001): no difference was observed for blastic evolution (P = .478). Number of deaths was higher in the EL (12 [16.2%] vs 2 [3.2%] in YA and 0 in MA, P < .001): however, 11/12 deaths in EL were not related to CML. The PFS curve in MA was significantly longer than in YA and in EL (P = .02). The OS curve in EL was significantly shorter than in YA and in MA (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Age at diagnosis influences significantly the course of CML patients treated with imatinib: a possible explanation of the counterintuitive worse course in YA is the delayed diagnosis compared to elderly.