Incidental and Asymptomatic Splenic Infarction and Infrarenal Thrombus in a COVID-19 Patient.

The cytokine storm associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers a hypercoagulable state leading to venous and arterial thromboembolism. Lab findings associated with this phenomenon are elevated D-dimer, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and procalcitonin. We present the case of a 66-year-old male with dyslipidemia who was diagnosed with COVID-19 with worsening shortness of breath, myalgia, and loss of taste. Physical examination was remarkable for crackles with diminished lung sounds and use of his accessory muscles. Labs showed normal white blood cell count, D-dimer of 1.42 mg/L, ferritin of 961 ng/mL, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) of 621 U/L, and CRP of 2.1 mg/dL. Chest X-ray showed atypical pneumonitis with patchy abnormalities. He required oxygen supplementation with fraction of inspired oxygen of 100% proning as tolerated. He received remdesivir, ceftriaxone, azithromycin, dexamethasone, prophylactic enoxaparin, and a unit of plasma therapy. His D-dimer had increased from 1.65 to 3.51 mg/L with worsening dyspnea. At this time, computed tomography angiogram (CTA) of the chest showed extensive ground-glass opacities and a 2.4 × 1.9 × 1.3 cm distal thoracic aortic intraluminal thrombus. He was started on a heparin drip. A follow-up CTA of the aorta showed thrombus or hypoattenuation within the splenic artery and wedge-shaped areas extending from the hilum with possible infarction and a 6 mm thrombus in the infrarenal abdominal aorta. He was transitioned to enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily. He remained asymptomatic from his splenic infarction. This case adds more insight to splenic infarction associated with COVID-19 in addition to the 32 reported cases documented thus far. Management of thromboembolism includes a therapeutic dose of anticoagulation. To prevent thromboembolism, prophylactic anticoagulation is recommended for those hospitalized with COVID-19.

Immunotherapy: A Case Series.

Immunotherapy is on the rise as a treatment option for advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma among others. It consists of two main classes being cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA 4) inhibitors and programmed cell death 1 (PD 1) inhibitors. We report a case series of four patients who were started on either pembrolizumab or nivolumab for the treatment of melanoma or lung cancer. While on immunotherapy, they developed various side effects related to the immunotherapy including pneumonitis, transaminitis, thyroiditis, nephritis, and hypophysitis. To treat this complication, immunotherapy must be discontinued or held with immunosuppressant initiation as treatment. Most often the immunosuppressant of choice is steroids. After symptoms improve, patients can decide along with the clinician on restarting or completely stopping immunotherapy. Within our case series, three of four patients had resolutions of their symptoms with steroid treatment with one who was lost to follow up. Of the three patients who were being followed up, one had a relapse of side effects after resuming immunotherapy and decided against further treatment with immunotherapy. Another patient is doing well resuming immunotherapy on a daily dose of steroids. The last patient decided to not continue with immunotherapy after experiencing a flare of his symptoms when he was being treated since he missed a few doses of steroids. Further research is needed about the risk of flares of complications when resuming immunotherapy alone or with immunotherapy and steroid treatment.

COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Among Rural Appalachian Healthcare Workers (Eastern Kentucky/West Virginia): A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction The success of a vaccination program is dependent on vaccine efficacy and the number of people vaccinated. Healthcare workers are the first to receive the COVID-19 vaccine based on CDC phase 1a recommendations and are a point of contact for information for patients, so they must be well-educated on common misconceptions about the vaccine. Objective To identify acceptance/refusal rates of COVID-19 vaccine, reasons for refusal, and to understand the impact of demographics, work environment, and comorbidities on vaccine acceptance. Methods A cross-sectional study of 1076 healthcare employees in Rural Appalachian utilizing electronic and paper-based 12 question surveys from December 10, 2020, through December 20, 2020, followed up to April 2021. Results Within our study, 52.3% of our healthcare workers would accept vaccination with higher age, male gender, physicians, and those who receive annual flu vaccines more likely to accept vaccination. The most common reason for refusal was unknown side effects (88.5%). The second reason for refusal at 33.5% was waiting for someone else to take the vaccine first. In February 2021, the percentage of our healthcare workers who were vaccinated was 48%, which then increased to 55% in March 2021. By April 2021, the vaccination percentage of our healthcare workers reached 59%. Conclusions In order to predict how the public percentage of vaccination would be, healthcare workers need to address concerns about side effects from the vaccines and encourage the public to get the vaccines since healthcare workers themselves had already received the vaccines and can educate the patients on how they did after getting the shots.