Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Assunto principal
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Microbiol ; 13: 956785, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36160206

RESUMO

Continuous cropping can lead to increased soil-borne diseases of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), resulting in a reduction in its yield quality. However, our understanding of the influence of continuous cropping on sugar beet-associated microbial community is limited and their interactions remain unclear. Here, we described and analyzed microbial diversity (N = 30) from three sugar beet belowground compartments (bulk soil, rhizosphere soil, and beetroot) using 16S rRNA and ITS sequencing. The continuous cropping showed lower bacterial alpha diversity in three belowground compartments and higher fungal alpha diversity in roots compared to the non-continuous cropping. There were significant differences in fungal community composition between the two groups. Compared with non-continuous cropping, continuous cropping increased the relative abundance of potentially pathogenic fungi such as Tausonia, Gilbellulopsis, and Fusarium, but decreased the relative abundance of Olpidium. The fungal flora in the three compartments displayed different keystone taxa. Fungi were more closely related to environmental factors than bacteria. Overall, changes in microbial diversity and composition under continuous cropping were more pronounced in the fungal communities, and the results of the study could guide development strategies to mitigate continuous crop adversity.

2.
J Plant Physiol ; 277: 153771, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36044811

RESUMO

Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an important sugar crop that is popularly cultivated in a variety of agriculture conditions. Here, we studied sugar beet growth in different pH soils (pH 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0) and analyzed their growth status and physiology. Sugar beet growth was best at pH 9.0 and worst at pH 5.0. As the soil pH decreased from 9.0 to 5.0, the osmoregulatory substances, antioxidant enzyme activity, and elemental contents in leaves and roots showed increasing trends, while photosynthesis and macronutrient contents showed decreasing trends. To explore the physiological mechanisms sugar beet use to respond to different pH environments, we analyzed the correlations between leaf net photosynthesis rate and physiological changes and nutrient contents of sugar beet. One of the factors inhibiting sugar beet growth in low pH soils was a reduction in photosynthetic capacity. The accumulation of osmoregulatory substances and increased peroxidative damage may have led to the decrease in leaf net photosynthesis rate. Furthermore, the decrease in nutrient content and accumulation of metal elements were correlated with the decrease in leaf photosynthetic rate. QRT-PCR analysis showed higher expression levels of antioxidant enzyme genes in the leaves and roots of sugar beet grown in low pH environments compared to those in high pH environments. Correspondingly, antioxidant enzyme activity was significantly higher in beets in low pH environments than in beets in high pH environments. These results provide important insight into the physiological responses by which sugar beet can adapt to different pH soils.


Assuntos
Beta vulgaris , Antioxidantes/metabolismo , Beta vulgaris/genética , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Plântula/metabolismo , Solo , Açúcares/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA