Side branch predilatation during percutaneous coronary bifurcation intervention: Long-term mortality analysis.

BACKGROUND: Side branch predilatation (SBPD) during coronary bifurcation interventions is a technique that is not recommended by the latest guidelines. However, the data about the clinical outcomes after SBPD are surprisingly few. AIMS: The current study aimed to explore the association between SBPD and mortality in long-term follow-up. METHODS: All patients with coronary bifurcation stenoses revascularized with percutaneous coronary intervention were included in a prospective registry. Patients with stable angina and a bifurcation lesion with ≥50% diameter stenosis were included in the current analysis. Patients were assigned to two groups - those with SBPD(+) and those without SBPD(-). Propensity score matching was performed to equalize the risk factors and severity of coronary artery disease between the groups. A Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test for between-group differences was also performed. RESULTS: From January 2013 to June 2021, 813 patients were included in the final study population. The mean age was 67 (10) years. After propensity score matching, 648 patients remained for analysis - 324 in each group. At a median follow-up of 57 months patients in the SBPD(+) group had a higher all-cause mortality (n = 107 (33%) vs. n = 98 [30.2%]; P = 0.045) and cardiovascular mortality (n = 82 [25.3%] vs. n = 70 [21.6%]; P = 0.03) when compared with SBPD(-) patients. SBPD was independently associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSION: SBPD treatment of coronary bifurcation stenoses is associated with worse patient survival in the follow-up of up to 8 years. SBPD treatment gives better angiographic results, but this did not translate into better clinical outcomes.

Intracoronary electrocardiogram to guide percutaneous interventions in coronary bifurcations - a proof of concept: the FIESTA (Ffr vs. IcEcgSTA) study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the intracoronary electrocardiogram (icECG) to detect ischaemia during bifurcation lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a reference. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with significant bifurcation lesions defined as FFR ≤0.80 were included. FFR and icECG were performed in the main vessel (MV) and side branch (SB) before and after provisional stenting. icECG was recorded with an uninsulated proximal wire end connected to a unipolar lead. The diagnostic accuracy of the icECG for the detection of ischaemia in the SB after MV stenting was determined with FFR as a reference. Overall, 37 patients were included. Seventeen bifurcations had an SB FFR ≤0.80 after MV stenting and 20 patients had an ST-segment elevation on the icECG. There was significant correlation between SB FFR and ST-segment elevation on the icECG (r=-0.533, p<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of icECG ST-elevation to detect functionally significant SB stenosis revealed an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.80) with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 75% with a positive predictive value of 75% and negative predictive value of 88%. Neither SB FFR nor icECG correlated with SB percent diameter stenosis after MV stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary ECG has a good ability to predict functionally significant stenosis at the SB after MV stenting during bifurcation PCI. This method provides a novel strategy to assess the significance of an SB lesion without the need of a pressure wire.

Prediction of troponin elevation by means of intracoronary electrocardiogram during percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary bifurcation lesions (from COronary SIde Branch Residual IschemiA and COllateralization Assessment Study; COSIBRIA & Co Study.

BACKGROUND: The influence of periprocedural ischaemia on coronary artery bifurcation stenting (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) remains uncertain. AIM: To determine the differences in rates of end procedural ischaemia after bifurcation lesion PCI detected with intracoronary electrocardiography (icECG). METHODS: Unipolar icECGs were recorded before, during, and after stent placement and at the end of procedure in side branch (SB) and main branch (MB). Coronary wire was placed in all distal vessels with diameter > 1.5 mm to "map" the distal zones of ischaemia. The patient population consisted of patients with stable/unstable angina with troponin I evaluated before and after PCI. RESULTS: We studied 147 patients (68% males) with mean age of 64 ± 9 years. One hundred and forty-two patients had icECG recordings at the end of PCI from all locations of the treated region; 36% of patients had MB ST segment elevation (STE) and 31% had icECG STE in the SB region (p = 0.378). The icECG had sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 81% to detect troponin I elevation, with positive predictive value of 81% and negative predictive value of 83%. The independent predictors of troponin increase (> 5 × N) were: sex (for female gender, OR = 0.130, CI 0.017-0.995, p = 0.049), previous myocardial infarction (OR = 33.23, CI 2.802-394.1, p = 0.005), and icECG STE in MB or SB or occlusion of secondary SB (OR = 7.877, CI 2.474-25.07, p < 0.001) and for any troponin elevation were double product - SBPxHR (OR = 0.999, CI 0.999-1.00, p = 0.022) and icECG STE in MB or SB or occlusion of secondary SB (OR = 9.762, CI 3.273-29.12, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary electrocardiography is a highly sensitive and specific method for determination of ischaemic regions and prediction of elevated troponin I.