Two-year outcomes of episcleral brachytherapy adjunct to anti-VEGF therapy for treatment-resistant nAMD.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of episcleral brachytherapy (ESB) for the treatment of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a 6-subject cohort adjunct to anti-VEGF therapy. METHODS: Six eyes of six subjects with anti-VEGF resistant nAMD (persistent fluid or hemorrhage despite frequent anti-VEGF treatment) were treated with ESB between May 2018 and July 2018 as part of a larger early feasibility trial. Baseline and follow-up exams with multi-modal imaging were conducted. RESULTS: In this analysis, six eyes were included. The mean age was 74.7 years; 33% were female; 67% had polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. The mean number of lifetime anti-VEGF injections received prior to the study enrollment was 33.9 injections and 10 injections in the year prior to the study enrollment. In the first and second years following ESB, the mean number of injections was 8.5 and 8, respectively. No evidence of radiation-induced toxicity through 2 years following ESB was observed. The mean baseline VA was 55.3 letters. At 1 year, the mean VA increased by 3.2 letters and 1.7 letters at year 2. At 2 years, the mean change in vascular complex on ICGA was - 18%, - 43% on OCTA, and - 5% on FA. The subjects also experienced a mean decrease in CRT on OCT of 21% after 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this six-subject cohort with 2-year data support additional investigations of ESB for nAMD, specifically those with persistent disease activity and treatment resistant nAMD.

Donor survey to assess facial flushing during automated red cell collections and medication use.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a donor survey to assess the occurrence of facial flushing and other symptoms during automated 2-U red cell collections (2RBC) and plateletpheresis (PLT) procedures and evaluated the possible association of the reactions with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or with the collection technology. METHODS: An online survey was developed using Zoomerang to capture details of the donors' experience and medication use after 2RBC or PLT donations in regional blood centers of the American Red Cross. RESULTS: Between 12/16/09 and 4/19/10, 1,299 donors in five American Red Cross blood center regions completed an online survey (739 2RBC, 4.2% total registrations; 560 PLT, 2.3% total registrations). Facial flushing was reported by 29 donors, and was more likely associated with 2RBC than PLT procedures (3.0% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.03). Facial flushing with 2RBC donation was reported by eight of 72 (11%) donors on ACE inhibitors; and 14 of 667 (2%) donors who were not taking ACE inhibitors (P = 0.001). The incidence of facial flushing reactions with PLT donation was less than 2% whether donors reported ACEI inhibitor use or not. More than 95% of the donors reported their intent to donate again, regardless of symptoms. CONCLUSION: Facial flushing was more often reported by 2RBC donors taking ACE inhibitors than other donors [11% vs. 2%; P = 0.001]; and was uncommon among PLT donors, irrespective of ACE inhibitor use (<2%). All blood donors should be informed of the potential for common, minor side effects of the collection procedure and the possible but rare occurrence of more medically serious complications.

Evidence-based practice guidelines for plasma transfusion.

BACKGROUND: There is little systematically derived evidence-based guidance to inform plasma transfusion decisions. To address this issue, the AABB commissioned the development of clinical practice guidelines to help direct appropriate transfusion of plasma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies was performed to quantify known benefits and harms of plasma transfusion in common clinical scenarios (see accompanying article). A multidisciplinary guidelines panel then used the SR and the GRADE methodology to develop evidence-based plasma transfusion guidelines as well as identify areas for future investigation. RESULTS: Based on evidence ranging primarily from moderate to very low in quality, the panel developed the following guidelines: 1) The panel suggested that plasma be transfused to patients requiring massive transfusion. However, 2) the panel could not recommend for or against transfusion of plasma at a plasma : red blood cell ratio of 1:3 or more during massive transfusion, 3) nor could the panel recommend for or against transfusion of plasma to patients undergoing surgery in the absence of massive transfusion. 4) The panel suggested that plasma be transfused in patients with warfarin therapy-related intracranial hemorrhage, 5) but could not recommend for or against transfusion of plasma to reverse warfarin anticoagulation in patients without intracranial hemorrhage. 6) The panel suggested against plasma transfusion for other selected groups of patients. CONCLUSION: We have systematically developed evidence-based guidance to inform plasma transfusion decisions in common clinical scenarios. Data from additional randomized studies will be required to establish more comprehensive and definitive guidelines for plasma transfusion.

Platelet function testing to assess effectiveness of platelet transfusion therapy.

BACKGROUND: Posttransfusion corrected count increments (CCI) following administration of platelets is the standard method for assessing effectiveness of platelet transfusion therapy. However, improvement in platelet count following transfusion may not necessarily indicate improvement in platelet function or restoration of primary hemostatic capacity. To address this possibility, we investigated the effectiveness of platelet transfusion based on results of the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100) and post-transfusion CCI. INVESTIGATION DESIGN AND METHODS: Platelet transfusion requests with different indications received at the blood bank were evaluated for inclusion in the investigation. Pre-transfusion, the following laboratory tests were performed: (1) PFA-100 assays (blood collected in 3.2% buffered sodium citrate) performed with CEPI and CADP test cartridges; (2) complete blood count (in EDTA) and platelet count; and (3) routine coagulation profile including PT, PTT, fibrinogen and D-Dimer. Only patients with normal coagulation profiles were included. The same set of tests were performed on a new blood sample collected 10-60 min post-transfusion. Chart review and clinical evaluation for response to platelet therapy were performed on each occasion of transfusion. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients, five of whom were transfused on more than one occasion were evaluated. Thirty-five transfusion incidents were included. Posttransfusion outcomes were divided into two groups--those that resulted in shortening (>40 s) or normalization of the closure time (Group A) and those that had no change or greater prolongation of the closure time (Group B) when compared to the pre-transfusion value. Seventeen and eighteen transfusion episodes were categorized as Groups A and B, respectively. In Group A with improved PFA testing, nine patients had bleeding as indication for transfusion and six of these had concomitant improvement in their clinical picture as confirmed by control of hemorrhage. In contrast in Group B with no improvement in PFA testing, seven patients had bleeding as indication for transfusion and none showed cessation of hemorrhagic symptoms. These findings were statistically significant (p=0.0114). Similar evaluation using the post-transfusion CCI showed no correlation to bleeding symptoms in these patients (p-=0.500). CONCLUSIONS: In this evaluation, platelet function testing using the PFA-100 provided a better indication of transfusion outcome than did the post-transfusion CCI. Using this approach, PFA-100 may be an effective aid for supporting platelet transfusion decisions and may further aid in improving management of the hospital blood bank platelet inventory.

Plasmapheresis in the dysproteinemias.

The dysproteinemias consist of a broad range of serious disease states with the common thread of excessive production of an abnormal, or para-protein. Various clinical syndromes may arise, either from the underlying disease process, the excess paraprotein, or both. Clinical presentation depends upon the organ system(s) affected by the abnormal protein. Diseases included under the classification of dysproteinemias include cryoprotein-related diseases, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia, hyperviscosity syndrome, monoclonal gammopathy, multiple myeloma, light chain disease, and amyloidosis. Plasmapheresis, often in conjunction with other therapies, has been widely used to treat the dysproteinemias and their resulting clinical syndromes. Automated plasmapheresis, which separates plasma from the cellular blood elements by centrifugation, is used most commonly in the United States. Membrane separation and immunoadsorption techniques are more commonly used in Europe and Japan. In automated plasmapheresis, the plasma is removed from the patient's circulation and replaced with a protein-based fluid such as 5% human albumin solution or plasma protein fraction or with fresh frozen plasma. Membrane separation and immunoadsorption allow the offending proteins to be removed more selectively from the patient's plasma prior to the plasma being returned to the patient. This review article presents a description of each disease, the rationale for plasmapheresis therapy, recommended schedules of plasmapheresis, and the use of adjunctive therapies. Results of published studies, case reports, and the author's experience in treating these diseases will serve as the foundation for discussion.