Adult experiences in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is an overgrowth and epigenetic disorder caused by changes on chromosome 11p15. The primary features requiring management in childhood include macroglossia, omphalocele, lateralized overgrowth, hyperinsulinism, and embryonal tumors. Management guidelines have not been developed for adults with BWS and there have been few studies to assess the clinical needs of these patients. Furthermore, there have been few studies on the psychosocial implications of BWS in children or adults. Here, we present a descriptive summary of data gathered from two separate adult BWS cohorts. The first, a patient-based survey cohort, includes self-reported health information and recollections about BWS experiences, while the second provides results of a medical record-based assessment from patients in an overgrowth registry. Results highlight the clinical features and medical issues affecting two large independent cohorts of adults with BWS while noting similarities. Open-ended questions asked of the survey cohort yielded themes to guide future qualitative studies. Finally, the study demonstrated the reliability of patient-reported data and the utility of international partnerships in this context.

(Epi)genotype and Timing of Tongue Reduction Predict Safety and Long-Term Outcomes in Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Macroglossia is a cardinal feature of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) with a clinical spectrum where the indication and timing for surgery remain to be validated. This study leverages a cohort of molecularly characterized patients with BWS to correlate epigenetic diagnosis with phenotype and treatment outcome. METHODS: Patients with BWS seen in consultation for macroglossia from 2009-2022 were reviewed for phenotype, molecular diagnosis, tongue reduction status, timing of surgery (early = under 12 months), and perioperative complications. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-seven patients were included. Imprinting control region 2 loss of methylation (IC2 LOM) was the most common epigenotype (61%). Paternal uniparental isodisomy for chromosome 11 (pUPD11) comprised a larger proportion of patients undergoing tongue reduction (18%) than those not undergoing surgery (8%, p = 0.024) and was associated with need for repeat surgery (OR 4.49, 95% CI 1.06-18.98, p = 0.041). Complications including wound dehiscence, ventilator associated pneumonia, and unplanned extubation were more common in patients undergoing early surgery (20%) than late surgery (4%, OR 5.70, 95% CI 1.14-28.55, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents one of the largest cohorts correlating molecular diagnosis with clinical course of macroglossia treatment in BWS. Macroglossia in patients with pUPD11 is associated with higher rates of reoperation. Relief of obstructive sleep apnea with early tongue reduction must be weighed against risk of perioperative complications, most of which are non-surgical. This study highlights how molecular diagnosis advances clinical care by risk stratifying clinical outcomes in a center providing integrated multidisciplinary care for the BWS population.

Intervention Codesign in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit to Improve Family Meetings.

CONTEXT: Family meetings are encouraged in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) with the expectation of supporting parental shared decision-making (SDM). However, they often fall short of this goal. Additionally, interprofessional team and family meetings are dominated by input from physicians, under-utilizing the skillset of the full clinical team. OBJECTIVES: 1) To determine feasibility of a codesign process to optimize the preparation of the interprofessional team and parents for conducting SDM-oriented family meetings in the CICU, and 2) to describe the resulting elements of the intervention including new support documents for the team and family to prepare for the meeting, team member roles in the meeting, and optimization of communication skills. METHODS: Experience-based codesign was used with CICU clinicians and parents of children hospitalized in the CICU to develop an intervention at a single institution. Sessions were audio recorded and transcribed and analyzed using modified grounded theory. Participants were surveyed about their engagement in the codesign process to assess feasibility. RESULTS: Fifteen professionals and six parents enrolled in the codesign and endorsed engagement in the process and importance of the intervention elements. Participants identified the benefit of complementary parent and team preparation for family meetings noting five distinct types of meetings that occurred frequently. Documents, processes, and skills training were developed to improve interprofessional teamwork regarding shared decision making and support of parents in family meetings. CONCLUSION: A codesign of an intervention with clinicians and parents in the CICU is a feasible and resulted in an intervention with broad support among clinicians in the CICU.