[68 Ga]Ga-PentixaFor: Development of a fully automated in hospital production on the Trasis miniAllinOne synthesizer.

[68 Ga]Ga-PentixaFor is a frequently used radiotracer to image the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in various malignancies, infections, and cardiovascular diseases. To answer increasing clinical needs, an automatized synthesis process ensuring efficient and reproducible production and improving operator's radioprotection is needed. [68 Ga]Ga-PentixaFor synthesis has been described on other synthesizers but not on the miniAiO. In this work, we defined automated synthesis process and an analytical method for the quality control of [68 Ga]Ga-PentixaFor. Validation batches were performed under aseptic conditions in a class A hotcell. All the quality controls required by the European Pharmacopea (Eur. Ph) were performed. The analytical methods were validated according to the International Conference Harmonization (ICH) recommendations. Validation batches were performed with a radiochemical yield of 94.8 ± 2.6%. All the quality controls were in conformity with the Eur. Ph, and the validation of the analytical method complied with the ICH. The environmental monitoring performed during the synthesis process showed that the aseptic conditions were ensured. [68 Ga]Ga-PentixaFor was successfully synthesized with the miniAiO by a fully automated process. This robust production mode and the quality control have been validated in this study allowing to increase the access of patients to this new promising radiopharmaceutical.

Quantitative impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on nuclear medicine in France: the CORALINE study.

PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic reshaped the usual risk: benefit equilibrium that became a trade-off between the infection exposure risk for the patient (and for staff) and the risk associated with delaying or cancelling the nuclear medicine examination. This study aimed at quantifying the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown in France on nuclear medicine examination volume together with volume of examination cancellation and non-attendance. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the volume of planned examinations from 1 month before to 1 month after the first lockdown in French high-volume nuclear medicine departments (NMD) sharing the same information management system including both university hospitals, UH (n = 7), and cancer centres, CC (n = 2). RESULTS: The study enrolled 31,628 consecutive patients referred for a nuclear medicine examination performed or not (NMEP or NMEnP). The total volume of NMEP significantly dropped by 43.4% between the 4 weeks before and after the starting of the lockdown. The comparison of the percentage of NMEP and NMEnP between UH and CC is significantly different (p < 0.001). The percentage of NMEP during the study was 67.9% in UH vs 84.7% in CC. Percentages of NMEnP in UH and CC were due respectively to cancellation by the patient (14.9 vs 7.4%), cancellation by the NMD (9.5 vs 3.4%), cancellation by the referring physician (5.1 vs 4.4%) and non-attender patients (2.7 vs 0.2%). CONCLUSION: The study underlines the public health issue caused by COVID-19 above the pandemic itself and should be useful in preparing for potential resource utilisation and staffing requirements.