Outcomes in Severe Upper GI Hemorrhage from Dieulafoy's Lesion with Monitoring of Arterial Blood Flow.

BACKGROUND: Dieulafoy's lesion (DL) is a rare but increasingly recognized cause of severe upper GI hemorrhage (SUGIH). There is little consensus regarding the endoscopic approach to management of bleeding from DL. AIMS: Our purposes were to compare 30-day outcomes of patients with SUGIH from DL with Doppler endoscopic probe (DEP) monitoring of blood flow and guided treatment versus standard visually guided hemostasis (VG). METHODS: Eighty-two consecutive DL patients with SUGIH were identified in a large CURE Hemostasis database from previous prospective cohort studies and two recent RCTs at two university-based medical centers. 30-day outcomes including rebleeding, surgery, angiography, death, and severe medical complications were compared between the two treatment groups. RESULTS: 40.2% of DL bleeds occurred in inpatients. 43.9% of patients had cardiovascular disease, and 48.7% were taking medications associated with bleeding. For the entire cohort, 41.3% (26/63) of patients treated with VG had a composite 30-day outcome as compared to 10.5% (2/19) of patients treated with DEP (p = 0.017). Rebleeding occurred within 30 days in 33.3% and 10.5% of those treated with VG and DEP, respectively (p = 0.051). After propensity score matching, the adjusted 30-day composite outcome occurred in 39.0% in the VG group compared to 2.6% in the DEP group (p < 0.001). Adjusted 30-day rebleeding occurred in 25.3% in the VG group versus 2.6% in the DEP group (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: DL patients with SUGIH were frequently inpatients and had severe cardiovascular comorbidities and recurrent bleeding. Lesion arterial blood flow monitoring and obliteration are an effective way to treat bleeding from DL which reduces negative 30-day clinical outcomes.

Severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from linear gastric ulcers in large hiatal hernias: a large prospective case series of Cameron ulcers.

We report a case series of all consecutive patients hospitalized in our two tertiary referral medical centers over the past 17 years for Cameron ulcers causing severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH) or severe obscure GIH. Cameron ulcers were diagnosed in 25 of the 3960 screened patients with severe upper GIH or severe obscure GIH (0.6 %). Of these, 21 patients had a prospective follow-up (median time 20.4 months [interquartile range: 8.5 - 31.8]). Patients were more often elderly women with chronic anemia, always had large hiatal hernias, and were usually referred for obscure GIH. Twelve of the 21 patients (57 %) were referred for surgery while being treated with high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The other 9 patients (43 %) continued PPIs without any rebleeding during the follow-up. Cameron ulcers in large hiatal hernias are an uncommon cause of severe upper GIH. The choice of medical vs. surgical therapy should be individualized.

A comparison of liver transplantation outcomes in the pre- vs. post-MELD eras.

BACKGROUND: The model for end stage liver disease (MELD)-based organ allocation system is designed to prioritize orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for patients with the most severe liver disease. However, there are no published data to confirm whether this goal has been achieved or whether the policy has affected long-term post-OLT survival. AIM: To compare pre-OLT liver disease severity and long-term (1 year) post-OLT survival between the pre- and post-MELD eras. METHODS: Using the United Network of Organ Sharing database, we compared two cohorts of adult patients undergoing cadaveric liver transplant in the pre-MELD (n = 3857) and post-MELD (n = 4245) eras. We created multivariable models to determine differences in: (i) pre-OLT liver disease severity as measured by MELD; and (ii) 1-year post-OLT outcomes. RESULTS: Patients undergoing OLT in the post-MELD era had more severe liver disease at the time of transplantation (mean MELD = 20.5) vs. those in the pre-MELD era (mean MELD = 17.0). There were no differences in the unadjusted patient or graft survival at 1 year post-OLT. This difference remained insignificant after adjusting for a range of prespecified recipient, donor, and transplant centre-related factors in multivariable survival analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although liver disease severity is higher in the post- vs. pre-MELD era, there has been no change in long-term post-OLT patient or graft survival. These results indicate that the MELD era has achieved its primary goals by allocating cadaveric livers to the sickest patients without compromising post-OLT survival.

Evaluating the process of care in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a survey of expert vs. non-expert gastroenterologists.

BACKGROUND: When faced with the same facts, physicians often make different decisions. Aim To perform a survey to measure the process of care and variations in decision-making in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract haemorrhage (NVUGIH) and compare results between experts and non-experts. METHODS: We administered a vignette survey to elicit knowledge and beliefs about NVUGIH, including 13 'best practice' guidelines. We compared guideline compliance between experts and non-experts. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-eight gastroenterologists responded (46%). Experts endorsed more 'best practices' than non-experts (93% vs. 85%; P = 0.002). Non-experts were more likely to endorse incorrectly bolus dosing vs. continuous infusion of intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; 92% vs. 64%; P = 0.005) and to select standard-channel vs. large-channel endoscopes in high-risk bleeding (100% vs. 85%; P = 0.04). There were wide variations within groups regarding the timing of nasogastric lavage, use of promotility agents, use of hemoclips and appropriateness of snaring clots overlying ulcers. CONCLUSIONS: Experts are more likely to comply with NVUGIH guidelines. Non-experts diverge from experts in the dosing of PPIs and choice of endoscope in high-risk bleeding. Moreover, there are wide variations in key practices even within groups. This suggests that best practices have been generally well disseminated, but that persistent disconnects exist that should be further investigated.

Endoscopic treatment outcomes in watermelon stomach patients with and without portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Watermelon stomach is a source of recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhage and anemia. The aims of this study were to describe the endoscopic appearance and treatment outcomes in watermelon stomach patients with and without portal hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with watermelon stomach enrolled in a hemostasis research group's prospective studies from 1991 to 1999 were identified. Investigators collected data using standardized forms. Comparisons were made using the chi-squared test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 744 (4 %) consecutively enrolled patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage had watermelon stomach as the cause. Eight of these 26 patients (31 %) also had portal hypertension. These patients had diffuse antral angiomas, as opposed to the classic linear arrays seen in those without portal hypertension. The demographic data and clinical presentations of the two groups were otherwise similar. Palliative endoscopic treatment was associated with a significant rise in hematocrit and a decrease in the need for blood transfusion or hospitalization in watermelon stomach patients with and without portal hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Watermelon stomach patients with and without portal hypertension had similar clinical presentations. The endoscopic findings differed in that those with portal hypertension had more diffuse gastric angiomas. Bleeding was effectively palliated by endoscopic treatment, regardless of the presence of portal hypertension.