A Comparison of Skeletal Injuries Arising from Moped and Motorcycle Collisions.

Motorcycle and moped injuries remain a significant cause of motor-vehicle related morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of literature describing the skeletal injuries of moped riders and how these compare to those of motorcyclists, however. This study seeks to examine the skeletal injuries sustained in such incidents and determine if there are significant differences. Hospitalized riders injured on powered two-wheeled vehicles (PTW) between 2004 and 2007 were entered into a registry along with their presentation and clinical course. This registry was sorted by PTW type. Riders with injuries of the appendicular skeleton, bony pelvis, and spine were extracted. Injuries were categorized by bone location. Demographic data, helmet use, head injury, facial fracture, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and mortality were extracted. Overall, 406/578 motorcyclists, 197/357 moped riders, and 62/92 dirt-bike riders sustained fractures of the appendicular skeleton, pelvis and/or spine. Motorcyclists had a significantly higher ISS upon presentation and had increased first-hospital day mortality in addition to more skeletal injuries, more fractures of the upper extremity, and more fractures of the spine, pelvis, and foot. Moped riders had a significantly lower rate of helmet use and higher rate of head injuries and facial fractures. In summary, while both moped and motorcycle riders share a risk for injuries of the lower extremity, their overall pattern of injury differs. Motorcyclists appear to be at increased risk for more severe injuries and injuries of the upper extremity, spine, and pelvis, while moped riders are at increased risk for significant head and facial injury.

Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Proprionibacterium acnes) and Shoulder Surgery.

Infection is a rare but serious complication of shoulder arthroplasty. The most prevalent cause of patient infections is Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Proprionibacterium acnes), a commensal skin bacterial species. Its presentation is often non-specific and can occur long after shoulder arthroplasty, leading to delay in diagnosis. This bacterium is difficult to culture, typically taking 14 to 17 days for a positive culture and often does not exhibit abnormal results on a standard laboratory workup for infection (eg, ESR, CRP, and synovial WBC count). Male patients are at particularly high-risk due to having a greater number of sebaceous follicles than females. While it is difficult to diagnose, early diagnosis can lead to decreased morbidity, appropriate treatment, and improved clinical outcomes. Current options for treatment include antibiotics, one stage implant exchange, or two stage implant exchange, although success rates of each are not currently well described. A better understanding of the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of C. acnes infection could lead to better patient outcomes from shoulder arthroplasty.

Denosumab-Associated Peri-Implant Atypical Femur Fracture: A Case Report.

Bisphosphonate use has been associated with atypical pathologic fracture and slowed bone turnover. We present a case of a bisphosphonate-associated peri-implant atypical femur fracture following use of a recon nail for treatment of a prior bisphosphonate-associated atypical femur fracture.

The Effect of Mobile Tablet Computer (iPad) Implementation on Graduate Medical Education at a Multi-specialty Residency Institution.

Use of mobile tablet computers (MTCs) in residency education has grown. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of MTCs on multiple specialties' residency training and identify MTC adoption impediments. To our knowledge, this current project is one of the first multispecialty studies of MTC implementation. A prospective cohort study was formulated. In June 2012 iPad2s were issued to all residents after completion of privacy/confidentiality agreements and a mandatory hard-copy pre-survey regarding four domains of usage (general, self-directed learning, clinical duties, and patient education). Residents who received iPads previously were excluded. A voluntary post-survey was conducted online in June 2013. One-hundred eighty-five subjects completed pre-survey and 107 completed post-survey (58% overall response rate). Eighty-six pre- and post-surveys were linked (response rate of 46%). There was a significant increase in residents accessing patient information/records and charting electronically (26.9% to 79.1%; P<.001), but a significant decrease in looking up drug and treatment reference material (97.0% to 82.1%; P=.0039). There was a significant increase in MTC use as a primary means of charting when conducting rounds (4.9% to 39.5%; P<.001) and a significant decrease in using paper charts (30.1% to 15.7%; P=.0073). There was also a significant increase in MTC use as a primary means for explaining a diagnosis (7.7% to 57.7%; P<.001). The use of MTC has an impact on how residents approach medical education, clinical practice, and patient education. The survey tool may be useful in collecting data on MTC use by other graduate medical education programs.

Reduction of airway complications with fluid management protocol in patients undergoing cervical decompression and fusion across the cervicothoracic junction.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort analysis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of an intraoperative and intensive care unit protocol on incidence of airway complications for patients undergoing combined anterior-posterior cervical decompression and fusion crossing the cervicothoracic junction (CTAPF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Airway compromise remains an important potential complication for patients undergoing CTAPF. Volume of intravenous fluid replacement perioperatively has been correlated with risk of airway complications in this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing airway complications (postoperative airway edema requiring reintubation and/or prolonged need for intubation) in patients undergoing CTAPF prior to and after introduction of a standardized protocol. The protocol required limitation of crystalloid fluid resuscitation intraoperatively, with maintenance of blood pressure using vasopressors. Comparisons between the 2 cohorts included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, volume of IV fluid replacement, and incidence of airway complications and dysphagia. RESULTS: Among patients operated prior to establishment of the protocol, 45% (9/20) experienced airway edema requiring extended intubation or reintubation. This rate was reduced to zero among 8 patients operated after the adoption of the protocol (P = 0.029). Intraoperative IV fluid volumes were reduced from 6190 mL to 4802 mL after institution of the protocol (P = 0.016). EBL and total surgical time did not differ between the 2 cohorts (1024 mL vs. 869 mL, P = 0.443; and 6.76 hr vs. 7.18 hr, P = 0.460). Incidence of dysphagia was not significantly different between the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSION: Establishment of a fluid and airway management protocol for patients undergoing CTAPF reduced the incidence of prolonged intubation or reintubation. Given the potentially life-threatening impact of loss of airway patency, intraoperative restriction of IV fluid while maintaining adequate blood pressure may be helpful in increasing the safety of surgical intervention in this complex patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Shared decision making in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: results of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence that shared decision-making tools for treatment decisions improve decision quality and patient engagement, they are not commonly employed in orthopaedic practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of decision and communication aids on patient knowledge, efficiency of decision making, treatment choice, and patient and surgeon experience in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-three patients who were considered medically appropriate for hip or knee replacement were randomized to either a shared decision-making intervention or usual care. Patients in the intervention group received a digital video disc and booklet describing the natural history and treatment alternatives for hip and knee osteoarthritis and developed a structured list of questions for their surgeon in consultation with a health coach. Patients in the control group received information about the surgeon's practice. Both groups reported their knowledge and stage in decision making and their treatment choice, satisfaction, and communication with their surgeon. Surgeons reported the appropriateness of patient questions and their satisfaction with the visit. The primary outcome measure tracked whether patients reached an informed decision during their first visit. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate differences between groups. RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the intervention group (58%) reached an informed decision during the first visit compared with the control group (33%) (p = 0.005). The intervention group reported higher confidence in knowing what questions to ask their doctor (p = 0.0034). After the appointment, there was no significant difference between groups in the percentage of patients choosing surgery (p = 0.48). Surgeons rated the number and appropriateness of patient questions higher in the intervention group (p < 0.0001), reported higher satisfaction with the efficiency of the intervention group visits (p < 0.0001), and were more satisfied overall with the intervention group visits (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Decision and communication aids used in orthopaedic practice had benefits for both patients and surgeons. These findings could be important in facilitating adoption of shared decision-making tools into routine orthopaedic practice.