The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Trauma Outcomes in At-Risk Groups: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis with Control Group.

OBJECTIVE: Analyze the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on trauma outcomes at a population level and within at-risk subgroups. BACKGROUND: Trauma disproportionately affects the uninsured. Compared to the insured, uninsured patients have worse functional outcomes and increased mortality. The goal of the ACA was to increase access to insurance. METHODS: An interrupted time series was conducted using data from the National Inpatient Sample database between 2011 and 2016. Data from Alberta, Canada was used as a control group. Mortality, length of stay, and probability of discharge home with or without home health care was examined using monthly time intervals, with January 2014 as the intervention time. Single and multiple group interrupted time series were conducted. Subgroup analyses were conducted using income quartiles and race. RESULTS: After the intervention, there was a monthly reduction in mortality of 0.0148% ( P < 0.01) in the American cohort: there was no change in the Canadian cohort. The White subgroup experienced a mortality reduction: the non-White subgroup did not. There was no significant change in length of stay or discharge home rate at a population level. There was a monthly increase in the probability of discharge with home health (0.0247%: P < 0.01); this was present in the lower-income quartiles and both race groups. The White subgroup had a higher rate of utilization of home health pre-ACA, and this discrepancy persisted post-ACA. CONCLUSIONS: The ACA is associated with improved mortality and increased use of home health services. Discrepancies amongst racial groups and income quartiles are present.

There Is No Weekend Effect in the Trauma Patient.

BACKGROUND: The presence of a "weekend effect", that is, increased morbidity/mortality for patients admitted to the hospital on a weekend, has been reported in numerous studies across many specialties. Postulated causes include reduced weekend staffing, increased time between admission and undergoing procedures/surgery, and decreased subspecialty availability. The aim of this study is to evaluate if a "weekend effect" exists in trauma care in the United States. METHODS: Using the 2012-2015 National In-patient Sample database from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, adults with trauma diagnoses who were admitted nonelectively were analyzed. Using logistic and negative binomial regression adjusted for survey-related discharge weights and statistically significant covariables, mortality and length of stay (LOS) were assessed, respectively. Subgroup analysis was conducted using rural, urban teaching, and urban nonteaching hospital-type subgroups. Additional subgroup analysis of patients who required surgery during admission was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 22,451 patients were identified, with 3.94% admitted to rural and 81.42% to urban hospitals. Weekend admission did not have a statistically significant difference in adjusted-mortality (OR 0.928; 95% CI 0.858-1.003; P = 0.059) or LOS (IRR 0.978; 95% CI 0.945-1.011; P = 0.199). There was also no statistically significant increase in mortality or LOS for weekend admits in any of the hospital subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: There does not appear to be a weekend effect for trauma admission. This may be explained by the nature of trauma care in the United States, in which there is often 24-h in-house coverage regardless of day of the week. Replicating a trauma service coverage schedule may help other services decrease the presence of the weekend effect.

Burn Injuries From TikTok Challenges: A Brief Report.

Social media (e.g., TikTok) challenge is a relatively new phenomenon wherein a user creates and posts videos performing an often-dangerous task. The ease of access and availability of social media in recent times make teens and young adults susceptible to these viral Internet challenges and accidental injury. The severity, morbidity, and mortality of burn injuries from social media challenges have not readily been documented in the medical literature. In this brief report, we present three cases of accidental burns after attempting social media challenges involving boiling water or flame. The injuries ranged from superficial partial thickness burns to 24% total body surface area (TBSA) full thickness burns. Online challenges show the potential for severe injury and disability and underlie the importance of awareness and education of the public, further research into the usage of TikTok and other media platforms, and early referral to the American Burn Association recognized center.

Fracture related infection and sepsis in orthopedic trauma: A review.

Trauma is a leading cause of death in the United States for people under 45. Amongst trauma-related injuries, orthopedic injuries represent a significant component of trauma-related morbidity. In addition to the potential morbidity and mortality secondary to the specific traumatic injury or injuries sustained, sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients as well, and infection related to orthopedic trauma can be especially devastating. Therefore, infection prevention and early recognition of infections is crucial to lowering morbidity and mortality in trauma. Risk factors for fracture-related infection include obesity, tobacco use, open fracture, and need for flap coverage, as well as fracture of the tibia and the degree of contamination. Timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics for patients presenting with open fractures has been shown to decrease the risk of fracture-related infection, and in patients that do experience sepsis from an orthopedic injury, prompt source control is critical, which may include the removal of implanted hardware in infections that occur more than 6 weeks from operative fixation. Given that orthopedic injury constitutes a significant proportion of traumatic injuries, and will likely continue to increase in number in the future, surgeons caring for patients with orthopedic trauma must be able to promptly recognize and manage sepsis secondary to orthopedic injury.

Cryotherapy Induced Burns: A Case Series of Three Patients.

Whole-body cryotherapy involves the use of a specially designed liquid nitrogen cryochamber to expose the body to cold, dry air (below -100°C) for short periods of time and has been gaining popularity in the field of sports and exercise science as an aid in recovery following exercise or injury. While proponents of cryotherapy claim that it can reduce inflammation and expedite muscle recovery, there has yet to be published literature that supports these claims. While there is no evidence that cryotherapy provides any benefits, there is a risk for injury with the use of these devices owing to the extreme cold temperatures that are used. We present the three cases of patients who suffered frostbite injuries secondary to single cryotherapy sessions. The first case involved a 26-year-old male who suffered a full-thickness frostbite injury that eventually required excision and grafting, while cases 2 and 3 involve a 17-year-old male and a 28-year-old male who both suffered partial-thickness injuries.

Surgical Infection Society: Chest Wall Injury Society Recommendations for Antibiotic Use during Surgical Stabilization of Traumatic Rib or Sternal Fractures to Reduce Risk of Implant Infection.

Background: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures is recommended in patients with flail chest or multiple displaced rib fractures with physiologic compromise. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) and surgical stabilization of sternal fractures (SSSF) involve open reduction and internal fixation of fractures with a plate construct to restore anatomic alignment. Most plate constructs are composed of titanium and presence of this foreign, non-absorbable material presents opportunity for implant infection. Although implant infection rates after SSRF and SSSF are low, they present a challenging clinical entity often requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy, debridement, and potentially implant removal. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society's Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee and Chest Wall Injury Society's Publication Committee convened to develop recommendations for antibiotic use during and after surgical stabilization of traumatic rib and sternal fractures. Clinical scenarios included patients with concomitant infectious processes (sepsis, pneumonia, empyema, cellulitis) or sources of contamination (open chest, gross contamination) incurred as a result of their trauma and present at the time of their surgical stabilization. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for pertinent studies. Using a process of iterative consensus, all committee members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF in the absence of pre-existing infectious process, there is insufficient evidence to suggest existing peri-operative guidelines or recommendations are inadequate. For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF in the presence of sepsis, pneumonia, or an empyema, there is insufficient evidence to provide recommendations on duration and choice of antibiotic. This decision may be informed by existing guidelines for the concomitant infection. For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF with an open or contaminated chest there is insufficient evidence to provide specific antibiotic recommendations. Conclusions: This guideline document summarizes the current Surgical Infection Society and Chest Wall Injury Society recommendations regarding antibiotic use during and after surgical stabilization of traumatic rib or sternal fractures. Limited evidence exists in the chest wall surgical stabilization literature and further studies should be performed to delineate risk of implant infection among patients undergoing SSSRF or SSSF with concomitant infectious processes.

Review of Sepsis in Burn Patients in 2020.

Background: Severe burn injury results in substantial damage to the skin, inhibiting its ability to perform as the primary barrier to infection. Additionally, severe burn injury can lead to critical illness and extensive time in the intensive care unit (ICU). These two factors work to increase the risk of sepsis in the burn patient compared with other hospitalized patients. The increased risk of sepsis is compounded by the difficulty of diagnosing sepsis in severely burned patients because the pathophysiology of large burns mimics sepsis, leading to possible delay in diagnosis and initiation of treatment. Methods: A literature review was performed to discuss and review the diagnostic difficulties and criteria used to identify patients with sepsis. Additionally, the most current management of sepsis was reviewed and described in caring for burn patients with sepsis. Results: The incidence of sepsis in patients with more than 20% total body surface area (TBSA) burns is between 3% and 30% and is the most common cause of death in the burn patient, with pneumonia being the most common etiology. Several different diagnostic criteria for diagnosing sepsis in burn patients exist, however, none of these criteria have proven to be superior to clinical diagnosis by an experienced burn surgeon. As with sepsis in other patient populations, prompt diagnosis, initiation of antibiotic agents, and source control remain the standard management of sepsis in the burn patient. Conclusions: Because of the loss of the primary infection barrier function of the skin after a substantial burn injury, this patient population is at increased risk for sepsis. Because of the pathophysiology of burn injuries, diagnosing sepsis in the burn population remains challenging. Understanding the most common etiologies of sepsis in burn patients may help with more expedient diagnosis and initiation of treatment.

The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Burn Outcomes.

Uninsured and low socioeconomic status patients who suffer burn injuries have disproportionately worse morbidity and mortality. The Affordable Care Act was signed into law with the goal of increasing access to insurance, with Medicaid expansion in January 2014 having the largest impact. To analyze the population-level impact of the Affordable Care Act on burn outcomes, and investigate its impact on identified at-risk subgroups, a retrospective time series of patients was created using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database between 2011 and 2016. An interrupted time series analysis was conducted to examine mortality, length of stay, and the probabilities of discharge home, home with home health, and to another facility before and after January 2014. There were no changes in burn mortality detected. There was a statistically significant reduction in the probability of being discharged home (-0.000967, P < .01; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.0015379 to -0.0003962) or discharged home with home health (-0.000709, P < .01; 95% CI -0.00110 to 0.000317) after 2014. There was an increase in the probability of being discharged to another facility (0.00108, P = .01; 95% CI 0.000282-0.00188). While the enactment of the major provisions of the Affordable Care Act in 2014 was not associated with a change in mortality for burn patients, it was associated with more patients being discharged to a facility: This may represent a significant improvement in access to care and rehabilitation. Future studies will assess the societal and economic impact of improved access to post-discharge facilities and rehabilitation.

Obesity Paradox in the Burn Patient.

Despite the fact that obesity is a known risk factor for comorbidities and complications, there is evidence suggesting a survival advantage for patients classified by body mass index (BMI) as overweight or obese. Investigated in various clinical areas, this "Obesity Paradox" has yet to be explored in the burn patient population. We sought to clarify whether this paradigm exists in burn patients. Data collected on 519 adult patients admitted to an American Burn Association Verified Burn Center between 2009 and 2017 was utilized. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine the association between in-hospital mortality and BMI classifications (underweight <18.5 kg/m2, normal 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2, overweight 25-29.9 kg/m2, obesity class I 30 to 34.9 kg/m2, obesity class II 35 to 39.9 kg/m2, and extreme obesity >40 kg/m2). For every kg/m2 increase in BMI, the odds of death decreased, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.856 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.767 to 0.956). When adjusted for total BSA (TBSA), being obesity class I was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of mortality of 0.0166 (95% CI 0.000332 to 0.833). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality for underweight patients was 4.13 (95% CI 0.416 to 41.055). There was no statistically significant difference in odds of mortality between the normal and overweight BMI categories. In conclusion, the obesity paradox exists in burn care: further investigation is needed to elucidate what specific phenotypic aspects confer this benefit and how these can enhance the care of burn patients.