Comparison of various basal insulin dose adjustments for inpatients while unable to eat.

Background The American Diabetes Association recommends basal insulin or basal plus correctional insulin regimen for non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus unable to eat. There is limited evidence available examining ideal basal insulin dose reductions in this patient population. Aim This study aimed to determine the percent reduction of maintenance basal insulin that would provide the least hypoglycemic incidence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the non-intensive care unit setting. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus prescribed outpatient basal insulin with a minimum unable to eat status of two hours. Patients were divided into four groups; <25%, 25-50%, 51-75%, > 75% of basal insulin administered compared to home dose. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypoglycemia while unable to eat. Secondary endpoints included incidence of hyperglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, median daily blood glucose and hospital length of stay. Results A total of 173 patients were included. The primary outcome of hypoglycemia (5.9% vs. 8.8% vs. 14.3% vs. 12.3%; P = 0.578) was similar in all groups. There were no differences in hyperglycemia (P = 0.0701), severe hypoglycemia (P = 0.578) and median daily blood glucose (P = 0.428). Patients receiving 25-50% of home basal insulin had the longest unable to eat duration (11.5 h; P = 0.026); however, this was not statistically significant when adjusted using the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests. Conclusions No differences were observed in hypoglycemic events for patients unable to eat receiving various basal insulin dose reductions.

Adherence to goal-directed therapy for patients with cirrhosis hospitalized with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

PURPOSE: The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases has developed a standard of care for the treatment of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Evidence examining the adherence rate to these guideline recommendations is limited. This study aimed to determine the adherence rate to guideline-directed therapy for patients with cirrhosis hospitalized with SBP. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study conducted at a large academic hospital evaluated the adherence rate to guideline-directed therapy in adult patients with cirrhosis hospitalized with SBP. Included hospitalized patients had a documented diagnosis of cirrhosis and acute SBP. The adherence rate to guideline-directed therapy was determined by receipt of paracentesis within 24 hours of admission, request of Gram stain and culture tests, avoidance of fresh frozen plasma, receipt of albumin on days 1 and 3, receipt of empiric antibiotics within 6 hours, receipt of SBP prophylaxis, receipt of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, and offer of pneumococcal vaccination. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included. Provider adherence to goal-directed therapy was poor, with criteria met for only 10 (9.1%) patients. The therapies with the lowest adherence rates included SBP prophylaxis on discharge (54.5%), receipt of albumin on day 3 (42.7%), and offer of pneumococcal vaccination during admission (43.6%). Patients with a gastrointestinal consult were more likely than those without a consult to obtain albumin on day 1 (69.4% vs 36.8%, P = 0.001) and albumin on day 3 (52.8% vs 23.7%, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a lack of adherence to guideline-directed therapy for the management of SBP.