Sex differences in insomnia and hypersomnia complaints during major depressive episode: Results from a national sample.

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in sleep disturbances during major depressive episodes (MDE) have been suggested. This study compares the prevalence, sociodemographic characteristics, and psychiatric comorbidity associated with sleep complaints specific to each sex among adults with MDE. These findings are crucial for precise diagnosis, personalized treatment, and improved clinical outcomes. METHODS: In a large nationally representative prospective survey, we used multi-adjusted logistic regression models including sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric comorbidity, and depression severity to examine whether associations differ between men and women. RESULTS: Among women, 93.3 % reported at least one type of sleep complaints (i.e., trouble falling asleep, early morning awakening or hypersomnia) while 91.0 % of men did, with respectively 78.3 % and 77.2 % of insomnia complaints, and 46.2 % and 41.3 % of hypersomnia complaints. Women with sleep complaints were more likely to be black, with lower individual incomes, have histrionic personality disorder or a specific phobia. Conversely, men with sleep complaints were more likely to have a lifetime diagnosis of mania spectrum disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, drug use disorder, as well as dependent and schizotypal personality disorders. Surprisingly, being "never married" has emerged as a protective factor against sleep complaints in women, while posing as a risk factor in men compared to other marital statuses. Differences and specificities were also noted concerning subtypes of insomnia and hypersomnia complaints. LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design means the associations found do not imply causality. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide insights into the complex relationship between sleep and depression in men and women, highlighting the need for personalized interventions.

Antipsychotic use and 28-day mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: A multicenter observational retrospective study.

Prior research has yielded conflicting results about the potential influence of antipsychotics in patients with COVID-19. In this multicenter retrospective study, we examined the association of antipsychotic use at admission with 28-day all-cause mortality in a sample of 59,021 adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from January 2020 to November 2021. In a 1:1 ratio matched analytic sample (N=1,454) accounting for age, sex, hospital, hospitalization period, the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, other psychotropic medications, medications prescribed according to compassionate use or as part of a clinical trial, current diagnoses of psychiatric disorders, and clinical and biological markers of COVID-19 severity, antipsychotic use was not associated with 28-day mortality [23.5% (N=727) versus 18.6% (N=727); OR=1.16; 95%CI=0.89-1.51; p=0.280]. This association remained non-significant in exploratory analyses across all classes of antipsychotics and individual molecules, except for typical antipsychotics and loxapine, which were significantly linked to increased 28-day mortality, associations likely due to residual indication bias. Contrariwise, antipsychotics prescribed at daily doses higher than 200 mg of chlorpromazine-equivalents might be associated with reduced 28-day mortality when compared to patients not taking antipsychotics in the matched analytic sample [10.4% (N=154) versus 18.6% (N=727); AOR=0.56; 95%CI=0.31-0.96; p=0.040]. These results suggest that antipsychotic use, when prescribed at usual doses, are not be associated with 28-day mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.