Dyadic coping strategies and quality of care experience: An original study of patients living with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Multiple sclerosis has a major impact on the lives of patients and their caregivers. Measuring their experience is essential for improving the quality of care. Based on a sample of patient-informal caregiver dyads we examine whether coping strategies they implemented influenced their self-experience of quality of care. METHODS: One hundred and eighty three dyads were involved in this cross-sectional study. Self reported data included experience with the quality of care (Musicare) and coping strategies (Brief Cope) for patients and their caregivers. An actor-partner interdependence model (APIM) analysis was performed to assess the dyadic effects of coping strategies on experience of quality of care. RESULTS: Positive coping strategies were the most used by patients and caregivers alike. They were associated with a better experience of relationships with healthcare professionals, information about the disease and patient reception at the sites providing care. APIM analyses confirmed most of these results and identified one "partner" effect. CONCLUSION: The experience of the quality of the care of patients living with MS is related to the use of positive coping strategies.

Impact of methodological choices in comparative effectiveness studies: application in natalizumab versus fingolimod comparison among patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab and fingolimod are used as high-efficacy treatments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Several observational studies comparing these two drugs have shown variable results, using different methods to control treatment indication bias and manage censoring. The objective of this empirical study was to elucidate the impact of methods of causal inference on the results of comparative effectiveness studies. METHODS: Data from three observational multiple sclerosis registries (MSBase, the Danish MS Registry and French OFSEP registry) were combined. Four clinical outcomes were studied. Propensity scores were used to match or weigh the compared groups, allowing for estimating average treatment effect for treated or average treatment effect for the entire population. Analyses were conducted both in intention-to-treat and per-protocol frameworks. The impact of the positivity assumption was also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 5,148 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients were included. In this well-powered sample, the 95% confidence intervals of the estimates overlapped widely. Propensity scores weighting and propensity scores matching procedures led to consistent results. Some differences were observed between average treatment effect for the entire population and average treatment effect for treated estimates. Intention-to-treat analyses were more conservative than per-protocol analyses. The most pronounced irregularities in outcomes and propensity scores were introduced by violation of the positivity assumption. CONCLUSIONS: This applied study elucidates the influence of methodological decisions on the results of comparative effectiveness studies of treatments for multiple sclerosis. According to our results, there are no material differences between conclusions obtained with propensity scores matching or propensity scores weighting given that a study is sufficiently powered, models are correctly specified and positivity assumption is fulfilled.

Developing tools to evaluate quality of care management for patients living with multiple sclerosis: An original French initiative.

INTRODUCTION: Assessing the quality of care management for patients with a chronic disease such as multiple sclerosis (MS) is a major challenge for healthcare systems around the world. It needs to be carried out using tools that are recognized by professionals and patients alike, and should concern practices, systems, and scientific data. No such tools are currently available in Europe. The purpose of the present study was to develop indicators to contribute to assess the quality of care management for patients with MS in France. METHODS: An expert panel comprising 25 professionals from well known teams across France selected the indicators on the basis of consensus. In accordance with the Rand/UCLA Appropriateness Method, each expert had to agree with the recommendations, and there had to be agreement among the experts. RESULTS: The expert panel selected 48 indicators representing seven domains of care management for patients with MS: physical and rehabilitation medicine, disease progression, access to care, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) management, relapse management, management of disease-modifying treatments, and management of the symptoms of disability progression. Some of these quality indicators (notably pertaining to MRI management) had not previously been identified in the literature. CONCLUSION: These indicators may allow professionals to comprehensively assess and compare their practices and cooperation, thereby contributing to improve the quality of care management for patients with MS in France.

Evaluation of the quality of the care pathway for patients with multiple sclerosis in France: Results of an original study of a cohort of 700 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluating the quality of the care pathway for patients with chronic diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), is an important issue. Process indicators are a recognized method for evaluating professional practices. However, these tools have been little developed in the field of MS, and few data are available. The aim of this study was to describe, retrospectively, with validated indicators, the quality of the care pathway in a population-based cohort of 700 patients with the first manifestations of the disease occurring between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2001 and during the first 10 years of disease. METHOD: This assessment was based on 48 indicators specific to MS. The information required for the calculation of each indicator was collected from the source files of the 700 patients of the cohort. RESULTS: Data for the 10 years of follow-up were collected for 80% of the patients. In total, 36 indicators were calculated. These results reveal that there is room for improvement, particularly in terms of the initial assessment, access to ophthalmological evaluation, employment, obtaining an evaluation of the need for rehabilitation and access to such care. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey provide access to unprecedented new data in France, that professionals and patients can appropriate to improve the targeting of actions, to improve the quality of care further for patients with MS in France. We propose to continue this process by submitting, for discussion, a targeted list of updated indicators relating to changes in guidelines, and in issues concerning the quality of patient management.

Ten-year follow-up after mitoxantrone induction for early highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: An observational study of 100 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Six monthly courses of mitoxantrone were approved in France in 2003 for patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To report the 10-year clinical follow-up and safety of mitoxantrone as an induction drug followed by maintenance therapy in patients with early highly active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score<4, 12months prior to mitoxantrone initiation. METHODS: In total, 100 consecutive patients with highly active RRMS from the Rennes EDMUS database received monthly mitoxantrone 20mg combined with methylprednisolone 1g for 3 (n=75) or 6months (n=25) followed by first-line disease-modifying drug (DMD). The 10-year clinical impact was studied through clinical activity, DMD exposure, and adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent were relapse-free over 10years and the mean annual number of relapses was 0.2 at 10years. The mean EDSS score remained significantly improved for up to 10years, changing from 3.5 at mitoxantrone initiation to 2.7 at 10years. The probability of disability worsening and improvement from mitoxantrone initiation to 10years were respectively 27% and 58%, and 13% converted to secondary progressive MS. Patients only remained untreated or treated with a first-line maintenance DMD for 6.5years in average. In our cohort, mitoxantrone was generally safe. No leukemia was observed and six patients developed neoplasms, including 4 solid cancers. CONCLUSION: Monthly mitoxantrone for 3 or 6months, followed by maintenance first-line treatment, may be an attractive therapeutic option for patients with early highly active RRMS, particularly in low-income countries.

Cost-utility of oral methylprednisolone in the treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses: Results from the COPOUSEP trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that oral high-dose methylprednisolone (MP) is non-inferior to intravenous MP in treating multiple sclerosis relapses in terms of effectiveness and tolerance. In order to assist with resource allocation and decision-making, its cost-effectiveness must also be assessed. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-utility of per os high-dose MP as well as the cost-savings associated with implementing the strategy. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis at 28 days was carried out using data from the French COPOUSEP multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled non-inferiority trial and the statutory health insurance reimbursement database. Costs were calculated using a societal perspective, including both direct and indirect costs. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and bootstrapping methods assessed the uncertainty surrounding the results. An alternative scenario analysis in which MP was administered at home was also carried out. A budgetary impact analysis was carried at five years. RESULTS: In the conditions of the trial (hospitalized patients), there was no significant difference in utilities and costs at 28 days. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €15,360 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. If multiple sclerosis relapses were treated at home, oral MP would be more effective, less costly and associated with annual savings up to 25 million euros for the French healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: Oral MP is cost-effective in the treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses and associated with major savings.

Survey of diagnostic and treatment practices for multiple sclerosis (MS) in Europe. Part 2: Progressive MS, paediatric MS, pregnancy and general management.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The European Charcot Foundation supported the development of a set of surveys to understand current practice patterns for the diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis (MS) in Europe. Part 2 of the report summarizes survey results related to secondary progressive MS (SPMS), primary progressive MS (PPMS), pregnancy, paediatric MS and overall patient management. METHODS: A steering committee of MS neurologists developed case- and practice-based questions for two sequential surveys distributed to MS neurologists throughout Europe. RESULTS: Respondents generally favoured changing rather than stopping disease-modifying treatment (DMT) in patients transitioning from relapsing-remitting MS to SPMS, particularly with active disease. Respondents would not initiate DMT in patients with typical PPMS symptoms, although the presence of ≥1 spinal cord or brain gadolinium-enhancing lesion might affect that decision. For patients considering pregnancy, respondents were equally divided on whether to stop treatment before or after conception. Respondents strongly favoured starting DMT in paediatric MS with active disease; recommended treatments included interferon, glatiramer acetate and, in John Cunningham virus negative patients, natalizumab. Additional results regarding practice-based questions and management are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: Results of part 2 of the survey of diagnostic and treatment practices for MS in Europe largely mirror results for part 1, with neurologists in general agreement about the treatment and management of SPMS, PPMS, pregnancy and paediatric MS as well as the general management of MS. However, there are also many areas of disagreement, indicating the need for evidence-based recommendations and/or guidelines.

Induction or escalation therapy for patients with multiple sclerosis?

The concept of induction followed by a long-term maintenance treatment has attracted much attention for the treatment of multiple sclerosis over the 30 past years. It was first demonstrated by the combination of induction therapy with mitoxantrone (six-monthly courses) followed by maintenance therapy with an immunomodulatory treatment such as an interferon-ß or glatiramer acetate. Long-term observational studies confirmed that this therapeutic regimen provides a rapid reduction in disease activity and sustained disease control up to at least five years in 60% of patients. A better treatment response was observed in patients with early signs of aggressive disease, as shown in randomised studies (using six-monthly 12mg/m2 of mitoxantrone intravenously at a cumulative dose of 72mg/m2, followed by an interferon-ß) as well as in long-term observational studies. But the safety profile of mitoxantrone make it more particularly suitable for young patients with frequent early relapses with incomplete recovery and multiple gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions or spinal cord lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. More recently approved, the second candidate for an induction strategy is alemtuzumab: phases II and III randomised studies showed the superiority of alemtuzumab 12mg per day given intravenously for only five days and repeated for 3 days one year later, compared with interferon-ß three times a week. Like with mitoxantrone, results supported the concept of long-term benefit after a short induction rather than escalation, in a subset of patients with early very active MS, with a sustained control of the disease for up to 7 years in 60% of patients in the phase III extension studies and in a long-term observational study. On the contrary, when alemtuzumab was first studied later in the disease course, results were disappointing. However, the risk of developing manageable but potentially severe systemic autoimmune diseases within the years following the last course of alemtuzumab make it, like mitoxantrone, more suitable for patients with early aggressive MS. More recently, cladribine an oral immunosuppressant, showed interesting results in a phase III study extension suggesting its potential induction effect, since after two cycles of treatment (5 days repeated 1 month later) at one year of interval, the remained low up to 4 years of follow-up, in the absence of any new treatment. However, today other immunosuppressive drugs have proved to be strongly and rapidly efficacious in treating highly active MS patients but through a mechanism of continuous immunosuppression (i.e., natalizumab and ocrelizumab). Indeed, disease activity can reappear rapidly after stopping these drugs, sometimes associated with a rebound of the inflammatory process, which is the contrary of a mechanism of induction that is associated with a remnant effect. Taking into account advantages and disadvantages of the different DMDs, which enriched the today therapeutic arsenal for MS, we propose in this paper some algorithms summarizing our reflexion about using an escalation strategy or an induction strategy according to disease course and activity.

Can we stop immunomodulatory treatments in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The benefits of immunomodulatory treatments in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) are unclear, calling into question their continuation. In the present observational study, we investigated the effect of treatment withdrawal on the clinical course of SPMS. METHODS: We included 100 consecutive patients with SPMS who regularly attended our multiple sclerosis clinic. Inclusion criteria were (i) secondary progressive phenotype for at least 2 years, (ii) immunomodulatory treatment for at least 6 months and (iii) treatment stopped with no plans to switch to another. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data before and after treatment discontinuation were assessed. Factors associated with relapses and/or MRI activity were identified. RESULTS: Mean treatment duration was 60.4 ± 39.3 months, and mean follow-up duration after treatment withdrawal was 62.4 ± 38.4 months. The annualized relapse rate remained stable at 1 and 3 years after treatment withdrawal [0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05-0.17 and 0.07, 95% CI, 0.05-0.11, respectively], relative to the 3 years prior to treatment withdrawal (0.12, 95% CI, 0.09-0.16). Sixteen patients experienced a relapse and 19 had a gadolinium-positive MRI scan without relapse during follow-up. A gadolinium-positive MRI scan within the previous 3 years before treatment withdrawal and Expanded Disability Status Scale score of <6 were positively associated with relapse and/or MRI activity after discontinuation (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, including a limited number of patients with SPMS, the annualized relapse rate remained stable after treatment withdrawal, relative to before treatment withdrawal. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm this result and provide evidence-based guidelines for daily practice.

Survey of diagnostic and treatment practices for multiple sclerosis in Europe.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Up-to-date information is needed on the extent to which neurologists treating multiple sclerosis (MS) in Europe are integrating rapidly evolving diagnostic criteria, disease-modifying therapies and recommendations for monitoring disease activity into their clinical practice. METHODS: A steering committee of MS neurologists used a modified Delphi process to develop case- and practice-based questions for two sequential surveys distributed to MS neurologists throughout Europe. Case-based questions were developed for radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS), clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and RRMS with breakthrough disease. RESULTS: Multiple sclerosis neurologists from 11 European countries responded to survey 1 (n = 233) and survey 2 (n = 171). Respondents agreed that they would not treat the patients in the RIS or CIS cases but would treat a patient with a relatively mild form of RRMS. Choice of treatment was evenly distributed among first-line injectables and oral treatments for mild RRMS, and moved to second-line treatment as the RRMS case increased in severity. Additional results on RRMS with breakthrough disease are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was general agreement on some aspects of treatment, responses to other management and clinical practice questions varied considerably. These results, which reflect current clinical practice patterns, highlight the need for additional MS treatment education and awareness and may help inform the development of MS practice guidelines in Europe.

A 10-year follow-up of the European multicenter trial of interferon ß-1b in secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: To explore long-term effects of treatment and prognostic relevance of variables assessed at baseline and during the European secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) trial of interferon beta 1b (IFNB-1b). METHODS: We assessed 362 patients (60% female; median age 41 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS): 5.5; 51% randomized to IFNB-1b) for their EDSS and treatment history after 10 years. Non-parametric analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and multivariate linear regression models were applied. RESULTS: Median EDSS was 6.0 at the end of the randomized controlled trial (RCT), in the IFNB-1b and placebo groups, and 7.0 in long-term follow-up patients (those receiving IFNB-1b in the RCT were 6.5 and those receiving placebo in the RCT were 7.0; p = 0.086). 24 patients (6.6%) were deceased. The EDSS at baseline and the EDSS change during the RCT were the most important predictors of the EDSS 10 years later (partial R(2): 0.47). The ability to predict changes in EDSS 10 years after the RCT was limited (R(2): 0.12). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures remained in the predictive models, but explained < 5% of the variability. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this analysis did not provide convincing evidence to support a favorable long-term outcome in those patients allocated IFNB-1b during the RCT, in our SPMS cohort. The progressive stage of the disease remains largely unpredictable by clinical and conventional MRI measures, so better prognostic markers are needed.

Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most frequently seen demyelinating disease, with a prevalence that varies considerably, from high levels in North America and Europe (>100/100,000 inhabitants) to low rates in Eastern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa (2/100,000 population). Knowledge of the geographical distribution of the disease and its survival data, and a better understanding of the natural history of the disease, have improved our understanding of the respective roles of endogenous and exogenous causes of MS. Concerning mortality, in a large French cohort of 27,603 patients, there was no difference between MS patients and controls in the first 20 years of the disease, although life expectancy was reduced by 6-7 years in MS patients. In 2004, the prevalence of MS in France was 94.7/100,000 population, according to data from the French National Health Insurance Agency for Salaried Workers (Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs Salariés [CNAM-TS]), which insures 87% of the French population. This prevalence was higher in the North and East of France. In several countries, including France, the gender ratio for MS incidence (women/men) went from 2/1 to 3/1 from the 1950s to the 2000s, but only for the relapsing-remitting form. As for risk factors of MS, the most pertinent environmental factors are infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), especially if it arises after childhood and is symptomatic. The role of smoking in MS risk has been confirmed, but is modest. In contrast, vaccines, stress, traumatic events and allergies have not been identified as risk factors, while the involvement of vitamin D has yet to be confirmed. From a genetic point of view, the association between HLA-DRB1*15:01 and a high risk of MS has been known for decades. More recently, immunogenetic markers have been identified (IL2RA, IL7RA) and, in particular thanks to studies of genome-wide associations, more than 100 genetic variants have been reported. Most of these are involved in the immune response and often associated with other autoimmune diseases. Studies of the natural history of MS suggest it is a two-phase disease: in the first phase, inflammation is focal with flares; and in the second phase, disability progresses independently of focal inflammation. This has clear implications for therapy. Age may also be a key factor in the phenotype of the disease. In conclusion, France is a high-risk country for MS, but it only slightly reduces life expectancy. MS is a multifactorial disease and the implications of immunogenetics are major. Preventative approaches might be derived from knowledge of the risk factors and natural history of the disease (smoking, vitamin D).

Ten-year prognosis in multiple sclerosis: a better outcome in relapsing-remitting patients but not in primary progressive patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) prognosis remains a challenge for both patients and physicians. Complementary to natural history studies, updated population-based data from the first event suggestive of MS, at the time of the first approved disease modifying drug (DMD), are needed. Our objective was to provide a 10-year history of MS from clinical onset at time of first approved DMDs in a population-based cohort. METHODS: A population-based cohort of patients whose first clinical event suggestive of MS had occurred in Brittany between 2000 and 2001 was prospectively selected. History of relapses, treatments and disability up to 10 years after onset were collected. RESULTS: In all, 278 patients with either attack-onset (n = 244) or progressive-onset (n = 34) were recruited. Amongst attack-onset patients, 30% remained as clinically isolated syndrome and 70% had a second relapse after a median time of 1.7 years (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.4). 80% of relapsing-remitting MS patients received DMDs for at least 6 months. 29% reached disability status scale (DSS) 3 and 8% DSS 6. Amongst progressive-onset patients, 100% reached DSS 3 and 59% DSS 6. CONCLUSION(S): Our population-based study reports a lower risk of disability progression at 10-year follow-up in the relapsing-remitting MS group than previously reported. This better prognosis was not observed in the progressive-onset MS group. This finding impacts the prognosis given to patients in clinical practice.

Register-based incidence of multiple sclerosis in Brittany (north-western France), 2000-2001.

OBJECTIVES: To report on multiple sclerosis (MS) incidence in Brittany, north-western France. MATERIALS & METHODS: From 2000, we set up a population-based register for patients presenting a putative incident MS (PIMS), that is first symptoms compatible with MS onset. We used 3 medical sources of case ascertainment (neurologists, CSF, regional MS-Clinic). Eligibility criteria required both clinical onset and being permanent resident of Brittany in 2000 or 2001. From 2010, all medical records were tracked, the 10-year follow-up allowing previously reported data to be updated. RESULTS: Of 313 eligible PIMS, there were 208 definite MS (both McDonald and Poser criteria), 41 CIS-probable MS (Poser criteria), 32 CIS-possible MS and 32 non-MS. Our incident cohort of 249 MS cases with definite/probable MS (sex ratio 2.95) gave a crude annual incidence of 4.28 per 100,000 inhabitants (6.22 for women, 2.23 for men), and age-standardized rates (adjustment to the European population) of 4.41 [3.32-5.51], 6.68 [4.75-8.60], and 2.21 [1.12-3.31], respectively. Age-specific rates by gender and initial course showed that attack onset MS peaked at 25-29 years and progressive onset MS at 40-44 years in women (20-24 years and 45-49 years in men, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Brittany is confirmed a high-risk region for MS. Our data show marked differences in sex-specific pattern of MS incidence by clinical course and point out 25- to 29-year-old women as having the highest MS risk. While temporal variations cannot be excluded, comparison with overall French data suggests that other factors rather than latitude may influence the MS risk in France.

Long-term impact of interferon beta-1b in patients with CIS: 8-year follow-up of BENEFIT.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term impact of early treatment initiation of interferon beta-1b (IFNB1b, Betaferon/Betaseron) in patients with a first event suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: In the original placebo-controlled phase of BENEFIT, patients were randomised to IFNB1b 250 µg or placebo subcutaneously every other day. After 2 years or diagnosis of clinically definite MS (CDMS), all patients were offered open-label IFNB1b treatment for a maximum duration of 5 years. Thereafter, patients were enrolled in an observational extension study for up to 8.7 years. RESULTS: Of the initial 468 patients, 284 (60.7%; IFNB1b: 178 (61.0% of the original arm), placebo: 106 (60.2% of original arm)) were enrolled in the extension study. 94.2% of patients were receiving IFNB1b. Patients originally randomised to IFNB1b had a reduced risk of developing CDMS by 32.2% over the 8-year observation period (HR 0.678; 95% CI 0.525 to 0.875; p=0.0030), a longer median time to CDMS by 1345 days (95% CI 389 to 2301), and a lower annualised relapse rate (0.196 (95% CI 0.176 to 0.218) versus 0.255 (95% CI 0.226 to 0.287), p=0.0012), with differences mainly emerging in the first year of the study. Cognitive outcomes remained higher in the early treated patients. EDSS remained low over time with a median of 1.5 in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: These 8-year results provide further evidence supporting early initiation of treatment with IFNB1b in patients with a first event suggestive of MS.

'Clinically definite benign multiple sclerosis', an unwarranted conceptual hodgepodge: evidence from a 30-year observational study.

BACKGROUND: Benign multiple sclerosis (BMS) is a controversial concept which is still debated. However identification of this kind of patients is crucial to prevent them from unnecessary exposure to aggressive and/or long term medical treatments. OBJECTIVES: To assess two definitions of 'clinically definite benign multiple sclerosis' (CDBMS) using long-term follow-up data, and to look for prognostic factors of CDBMS. METHODS: In 874 patients with definite relapsing-remitting MS, followed up for at least 10 years, disability was assessed using the Disability Status Scale (DSS). CDBMS was defined by either DSS score≤2 (CDBMS1 group) or DSS score≤ 3 (CDBMS2 group) at 10 years. We estimated the proportion of patients who were still benign at 20 and 30 years after clinical onset. RESULTS: CDBMS frequency estimates were 57.7% and 73.9% when using CDBMS1 and CDBMS2 definitions, respectively. In the CDBMS1 group, only 41.7% (105/252) of cases were still benign 10 years later, and 41.1% (23/56) after an additional decade, while there were 53.8% (162/301) and 59.5% (44/74) respectively in the CDBMS2 group. CONCLUSIONS: This 30-year observational study, which is one of the largest published series, indicates that favourable 10-year disability scores of DSS 2 or 3 fail to ensure a long-term benign course of multiple sclerosis. After every decade almost half of the CDBMS were no longer benign. CDBMS, as currently defined, is an unwarranted conceptual hodgepodge. Other criteria using new biomarkers (genetic, biologic or MRI) should be found to detect benign cases of MS.

A short and validated multiple sclerosis-specific health-related quality of life measurement for routine medical practice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patient-reported health-related quality of life (Hr-QoL) is an essential end-point to assess the efficacy of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment. Most QoL tools were developed for clinical research, for which measurement accuracy is required, irrespective of ease of use or the human resources needed. In routine medical practice (RMP), time and resources are limited, requiring simple and quick tools. Our objective was to set up a Hr-QoL measurement adapted for patients with MS, and providing an accurate estimate of Hr-QoL, whilst remaining easy to use and interpret in the RMP context. METHODS: Literature searches, expert meetings and semi-structured interviews were used to gather relevant items and dimensions of existing scales. Scale development included item reduction and dimension identification through a cross-sectional observational study. The scale was validated on another independent representative sample. Statistically significant dimensions were identified using psychometric procedures, a Rasch polytomous model and iterative confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: From 12 potential dimensions, based on a sample of 331 patients with MS, the backward CFA identified physical, mental and energy dimensions, and item optimization selected 10 items constituting our Hr-QoL scale prototype. Its validity was assessed in an independent study of 457 patients with MS, which provided statistical evidence of reliability, reproducibility in time, invariance with regard to population subgroups and overall fitting with a Rasch polytomous model. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with existing alternatives, our 10-item three-dimensional Hr-QoL measurement tool is adapted to RMP, and constitutes an adequate compromise between precision and ease of use in patients with MS.

A web-based tool for personalized prediction of long-term disease course in patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Evidence-Based Decision Support Tool in Multiple Sclerosis (EBDiMS) is the first web-based prognostic calculator in multiple sclerosis (MS) capable of delivering individualized estimates of disease progression. It has recently been extended to provide long-term predictions based on the data from a large natural history cohort. METHODS: We compared the predictive accuracy and consistency of EBDiMS with that of 17 neurologists highly specialized in MS. RESULTS: We show that whilst the predictive accuracy was similar, neurologists showed a significant intra-rater and inter-rater variability. CONCLUSIONS: Because EBDiMS was consistent, it is of superior utility in a specialist setting. Further field testing of EBDiMS in non-specialist settings, and investigation of its usefulness for counselling patients in treatment decisions, is warranted.

[Is MRI monitoring useful in clinical practice in patients with multiple sclerosis? No]. / L'IRM est-elle utile dans le suivi des patients atteints de sclérose en plaques ? Non.

Is regular MRI monitoring useful in clinical practice in multiple sclerosis patients treated with disease modifying therapy (DMT) drugs? My answer is no. Tacking a DMT drug is not by itself a pertinent criterion for requiring a systematic MRI monitoring in MS patients. Five clinical criteria should be taken into consideration before prescribing regular MRI examinations. The clinical form of the disease: MRI monitoring in DMT treated patients, has been demonstrated as useful only in pure relapsing-remitting MS patients. Up to now, there is no convincing demonstration of therapeutic efficacy with any DMT drug, neither first-line nor second-line drugs in patients with primary or secondary progressive MS disease. The duration of the disease, epidemiological data leading to the concept of a two-stage disability progression in MS, emphasizes the importance of treating as early as possible RRMS patients in order to stop accumulation of new focal MRI CNS lesions. In this regard, an annual monitoring for the 5 first years of the disease looks reasonable in order to better personalize the treatment choice among the few approved DMT drugs. The duration of the treatment: a first MRI assessment at month 6 after initiating a new DMT drug is adequate in order to better distinguish responder versus no responder. The persistence of Gado+lesions at 6 months is a strong indication for considering alternative treatment. The disease activity: both criteria, clinical and MRI, are needed to recognized very active or aggressive relapsing MS patients, leading to decide a rapid use of second-line treatment therapy. The treatment choice: in JC positive MS patients treated with natalizumab, the risk of PML is as high as more than 1 % in those JC+MS patients that are treated continuously more than 24 months. A regular MRI monitoring (3 or 6months) is recommended in order to detect as early as possible MRI abnormalities suggesting PML.