Prevalence estimates of Helicobacter species infection in pancreatic and biliary tract cancers.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection is a well-established risk factor for gastric cancer and has been linked to other gastrointestinal diseases, including pancreatic and biliary tract cancers; however, the relevance of enterohepatic non-H. pylori helicobacters to the pathophysiology of these diseases remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We estimated the prevalence of two enterohepatic non-H. pylori helicobacters (Helicobacter hepaticus and Helicobacter bilis) in the framework of a hospital-based case-control study involving 121 patients with biliary tract cancer, pancreatic cancer, or other gastrointestinal diseases. Bile and blood samples were collected from the patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The presence of H. bilis, H. hepaticus, and other Helicobacter spp. was examined using bacterial culture, PCR-based detection, and serological tests. RESULTS: Culture of Helicobacter spp. from biliary brush samples was unsuccessful. Approximately 13.0% (15/115) of the bile samples collected from patients with a variety of gastrointestinal cancers, including pancreatic and biliary tract cancers, tested positive for one of the enterohepatic non-H. pylori helicobacter species as determined by PCR. Specifically, H. bilis and H. hepaticus DNA were detected in 11 and 4 bile samples, respectively. Approximately 20%-40% of the patients tested positive for serum non-H. pylori helicobacter IgG antibodies. The seroprevalence of H. bilis and H. hepaticus in the patients without evidence of H. pylori infection appeared to be higher in the pancreatic cancer group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a role for Helicobacter spp., especially H. bilis and H. hepaticus, in the etiology of pancreatic and biliary tract cancers.

Associations between polymorphisms in folate-metabolizing genes and pancreatic cancer risk in Japanese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting the associations between folate metabolizing gene polymorphisms and pancreatic cancer has been inconclusive. We examined their associations in a case-control study of Japanese subjects. METHODS: Our case-control study involved 360 newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer cases and 400 frequency-matched, non-cancer control subjects. We genotyped four folate metabolizing gene polymorphisms, including two polymorphisms (rs1801133 and rs1801131) in the methylenetetrahydrofolate (MTHFR) gene, one polymorphism (rs1801394) in the 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase reductase (MTRR) gene and one polymorphism (rs1805087) in the 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase (MTR) gene. Genotyping was performed using Fluidigm SNPtype assays. Unconditional logistic regression methods were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between folate metabolizing gene variants and pancreatic cancer risk. RESULTS: Overall we did not observe a significant association between these four genotypes and pancreatic cancer risk. For rs1801133, compared with individuals with the CC genotype of MTHFR C677T, the OR for those with the CT genotype and TT genotype was 0.87 (0.62-1.22) and 0.99 (0.65-1.51), respectively. For rs1801131, individuals with the CC genotype had approximately 1.2-fold increased risk compared with those with the AA genotype, but the association was not statistically significant. In analyses stratified by smoking and drinking status, no significant associations were noted for C677T genotypes. No significant interactions were observed with smoking and drinking with respect to pancreatic cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our data did not support the hypothesis that MTHFR polymorphisms or other polymorphisms in the folate metabolizing pathway are associated with pancreatic cancer risk.

A Phase I Study of S-1 and Gemcitabine with Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients with Non-Metastatic Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine the recommended dose (RD) for full-dose S-1 and low-dose gemcitabine combined with radiotherapy in patients with non-metastatic advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODOLOGY: Adult patients with non-metastatic advanced pancreatic cancer (Union for International Cancer Control T stage 3 or 4) were eligible. The weekly intravenous gemcitabine (level 0-1: 200 mg/ml,level 2: 300 mg/m on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36) dose was escalated starting from level 1 in a 3+3 design along with full dose twice-daily oral S-1 (level 0: 60 mg/m2/day, level 1-2: 80 mg/ml/day), and was administered on the same days as radiotherapy (1.8 Gy x 28 days). RESULTS: Eight patients were included in this study. A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 4 neutropenia) was observed in one of the first three patients in level 1, and three additional patients received the level 1 dose without any severe adverse events. DLTs (grade 3/4 neutropenia) were then observed in the first two patients given level 2 dose. Therefore, level 1 was designated as the RD. Common grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (62.5%), anorexia (37.5%), and pneumonitis (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of S-1 and gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy is a feasible regimen at the level 1 dose.

Association between variations in the fat mass and obesity-associated gene and pancreatic cancer risk: a case-control study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: It is clear that genetic variations in the fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene affect body mass index and the risk of obesity. Given the mounting evidence showing a positive association between obesity and pancreatic cancer, this study aimed to investigate the relation between variants in the FTO gene, obesity and pancreatic cancer risk. METHODS: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study in Japan to investigate whether genetic variations in the FTO gene were associated with pancreatic cancer risk. We genotyped rs9939609 in the FTO gene of 360 cases and 400 control subjects. An unconditional logistic model was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between rs9939609 and pancreatic cancer risk. RESULTS: The minor allele frequency of rs9939609 was 0.18 among control subjects. BMI was not associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Compared with individuals with the common homozygous TT genotype, those with the heterozygous TA genotype and the minor homozygous AA genotype had a 48% (OR=1.48; 95%CI: 1.07-2.04), and 66% increased risk (OR=1.66; 95%CI: 0.70-3.90), respectively, of pancreatic cancer after adjustment for sex, age, body mass index, cigarette smoking and history of diabetes. The per-allele OR was 1.41 (95%CI: 1.07-1.85). There were no significant interactions between TA/AA genotypes and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that rs9939609 in the FTO gene is associated with pancreatic cancer risk in Japanese subjects, possibly through a mechanism that is independent of obesity. Further investigation and replication of our results is required in other independent samples.

Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography criteria to diagnose autoimmune pancreatitis: an international multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Characteristic pancreatic duct changes on endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) have been described in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). The performance characteristics of ERP to diagnose AIP were determined. METHODS: The study was done in two phases. In phase I, 21 physicians from four centres in Asia, Europe and the USA, unaware of the clinical data or diagnoses, reviewed 40 preselected ERPs of patients with AIP (n=20), chronic pancreatitis (n=10) and pancreatic cancer (n=10). Physicians noted the presence or absence of key pancreatographic features and ranked the diagnostic possibilities. For phase II, a teaching module was created based on features found most useful in the diagnosis of AIP by the four best performing physicians in phase I. After a washout period of 3 months, all physicians reviewed the teaching module and reanalysed the same set of ERPs, unaware of their performance in phase I. RESULTS: In phase I the sensitivity, specificity and interobserver agreement of ERP alone to diagnose AIP were 44, 92 and 0.23, respectively. The four key features of AIP identified in phase I were (i) long (>1/3 the length of the pancreatic duct) stricture; (ii) lack of upstream dilatation from the stricture (<5 mm); (iii) multiple strictures; and (iv) side branches arising from a strictured segment. In phase II the sensitivity (71%) of ERP significantly improved (p<0.05) without a significant decline in specificity (83%) (p>0.05); the interobserver agreement was fair (0.40). CONCLUSIONS: The ability to diagnose AIP based on ERP features alone is limited but can be improved with knowledge of some key features.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography does not reliably distinguish IgG4-associated cholangitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis or cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Distinction of immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis (IAC) from primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) or cholangiocarcinoma is challenging. We aimed to assess the performance characteristics of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) for the diagnosis of IAC. METHODS: Seventeen physicians from centers in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom, unaware of clinical data, reviewed 40 preselected ERCs of patients with IAC (n = 20), PSC (n = 10), and cholangiocarcinoma (n = 10). The performance characteristics of ERC for IAC diagnosis as well as the κ statistic for intraobserver and interobserver agreement were calculated. RESULTS: The overall specificity, sensitivity, and interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of IAC were 88%, 45%, and 0.18, respectively. Reviewer origin, specialty, or years of experience had no statistically significant effect on reporting success. The overall intraobserver agreement was fair (0.74). The operating characteristics of different ERC features for the diagnosis of IAC were poor. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high specificity of ERC for diagnosing IAC, sensitivity is poor, suggesting that many patients with IAC may be misdiagnosed with PSC or cholangiocarcinoma. Additional diagnostic strategies are likely to be vital in distinguishing these diseases.

An overview of genetic polymorphisms and pancreatic cancer risk in molecular epidemiologic studies.

BACKGROUND: Although pancreatic cancer has been extensively studied, few risk factors have been identified, and no validated biomarkers or screening tools exist for early detection in asymptomatic individuals. We present a broad overview of molecular epidemiologic studies that have addressed the relationship between pancreatic cancer risk and genetic polymorphisms in several candidate genes and suggest avenues for future research. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed database. RESULTS: Overall, individual polymorphisms did not seem to confer great susceptibility to pancreatic cancer; however, interactions of polymorphisms in carcinogen-metabolizing genes, DNA repair genes, and folate-metabolizing genes with smoking, diet, and obesity were shown in some studies. The major problem with these studies is that, due to small sample sizes, they lack sufficient statistical power to explore gene-gene or gene-environment interactions. Another important challenge is that the measurement of environmental influence needs to be improved to better define gene-environment interaction. It is noteworthy that 2 recent genome-wide association studies of pancreatic cancer have reported that variants in ABO blood type and in 3 other chromosomal regions are associated with risk for this cancer, thus providing new insight into pancreatic cancer etiology. CONCLUSIONS: As is the case in other complex diseases, common, low-risk variants in different genes may act collectively to confer susceptibility to pancreatic cancer in individuals with repeated environmental exposures, such as smoking and red meat intake. Clarification of gene-gene and gene-environmental interaction is therefore indispensable for future studies. To address these issues, a rigorously designed molecular epidemiologic study with a large sample is desirable.

Incidence of and risk factors for developing pancreatic cancer in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pancreatic cancer sometimes occurs during the course of chronic pancreatitis. This study aimed to identify risk factors for developing pancreatic cancer associated with chronic pancreatitis. METHODOLOGY: The incidence of pancreatic cancer developing in 218 patients with chronic pancreatitis and clinical features of the chronic pancreatitis patients who developed pancreatic cancer were studied. RESULTS: Nine patients developed pancreatic cancer. Average period from the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis to the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was 9.6 years. All pancreatic cancers were diagnosed at an advanced stage. Only 2 patients had been followed-up periodically. There were no significant differences between chronic pancreatitis patients who developed pancreatic cancer and those who did not in male/female ratio (3.5 vs. 8), average age on diagnosis (65.0 vs. 56.5), alcoholic/non-alcoholic chronic pancreatitis (1.6 vs. 2.6), smoking habits (62.5% vs. 70.7%), diabetes mellitus (77.8% vs. 54.4%), and continued alcohol drinking (37.5% vs. 53.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Over the period examined, 4% of chronic pancreatitis patients developed pancreatic cancer. Sex ratio, onset age, etiology, smoking habits, diabetes mellitus, and continued alcohol drinking were not significant risk factors for developing pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis patients. Periodic follow-up due to the possibility of pancreatic cancer is necessary in chronic pancreatitis patients.

Long-term follow-up of chronic pancreatitis patients with K-ras mutation in the pancreatic juice.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pancreatic cancer is known to occur during the course of chronic pancreatitis in some patients. This study aimed to identify a high risk group for developing pancreatic cancer associated with chronic pancreatitis, particularly the presence of K-ras mutations in the pancreatic juice. METHODOLOGY: K-ras mutation was analyzed by enriched polymerase chain reaction-enzyme linked mini-sequence assay in endoscopically-collected pancreatic juice of 21 patients with chronic pancreatitis between 1995 and 2000. All of them were followed-up for 6.0 +/- 3.8 (mean +/- SD) years (range, 2.1-14.2 years). RESULTS: K-ras point mutation was observed in the pancreatic juice of 11 patients with chronic pancreatitis (2+, n=2; 1+, n=6; +/-, n=3). Of these, 2 chronic pancreatitis patients with 2+K-ras point mutation developed pancreatic cancer 4.5 and 10.8 years, respectively, after the examination. CONCLUSIONS: Two chronic pancreatitis patients with K-ras mutation developed pancreatic cancer 4.5 and 10.8 years later. Semiquantitative analysis of K-ras mutation in endoscopically-collected pancreatic juice appears to be a useful tool for identifying chronic pancreatitis patients at high risk for developing pancreatic cancer.

[A case of fulminant ulcerative colitis initially presenting as fever of unknown origin].

A 40's man was referred to our hospital for the investigation of fever of unknown origin lasting for a month. The laboratory data showed a prominent inflammatory reaction and a high titer of PR3-ANCA. Despite the various imaging studies and bacteriological examinations, the cause of the fever could not be detected until he complained of abdominal pain with bloody stool that appeared during hospitalization and which prompted colonoscopy, resulting in the diagnosis of moderate ulcerative colitis of the descending colon. Although temporal improvement was achieved by mesalazine administration, the symptom exacerbated again. Then, a combination of steroid administration and the leukocytapheresis (LCAP) was performed, but it was also not effective. His rapidly deteriorating condition with the lesion extending to whole colon necessitated subtotal colectomy. He has been afebrile and in good condition since the operation, which indicates the cause of the fever was due to ulcerative colitis.

Glycoprotein 2 in health and disease: lifting the veil.

In 2020, we discovered glycoprotein 2 (GP2) variants associated with pancreatic cancer susceptibility in a genome-wide association study involving the Japanese population. Individuals carrying a missense coding variant (rs78193826) in the GP2 gene resulting in a p.V432M substitution had an approximately 1.5-fold higher risk of developing pancreatic cancer than those without this variant. GP2 is expressed on the inner surface of zymogen granules in pancreatic acinar cells, which are responsible for the sorting, storage and secretion of digestive enzymes. Upon neuronal, hormonal, or other stimulation, GP2 is cleaved from the membrane of zymogen granules and then secreted into the pancreatic duct and intestinal lumen. While the functions of GP2 remain poorly understood, emerging evidence suggests that it plays an antibacterial role in the gastrointestinal tract after being secreted from pancreatic acinar cells. Impaired GP2 functions may facilitate the adhesion of bacteria to the intestinal mucosa. In this review article, we summarize the role of GP2 in health and disease, emphasizing its functions in the gastrointestinal tract, as well as genetic variations in the GP2 gene and their associations with disease susceptibility. We hope that its robust genetic associations with pancreatic cancer, coupled with its emerging role in gastrointestinal mucosal immunity, will spur renewed research interest in GP2, which has been understudied over the past 30 years compared with its paralog uromodulin (UMOD).

Differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer by diffusion-weighted MRI.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to clarify the clinical utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Thirteen AIP patients underwent DWI before therapy, and six of them underwent DWI after steroid therapy. The extent and shape of high-intensity areas were compared with those of 40 pancreatic cancer patients. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated in the AIP area before and after steroid therapy in pancreatic cancer patients and in a normal pancreatic body. RESULTS: On DWI, AIP and pancreatic cancer were detected as high-signal intensity areas. The high-intensity areas were diffuse (n=4), solitary (n=6), and multiple (n=3) in AIP patients, but all pancreatic cancer patients showed solitary areas (P<0.001). A nodular shape was significantly more frequent in pancreatic cancer, and a longitudinal shape was more frequently found in AIP (P=0.005). ADC values were significantly lower in AIP (1.012+/-0.112 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than in pancreatic cancer (1.249+/-0.113 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and normal pancreas (1.491+/-0.162 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded an optimal ADC cutoff value of 1.075 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s to distinguish AIP from pancreatic cancer. After steroid therapy, high-intensity areas on DWI disappeared or were markedly decreased, and the ADC values of the reduced pancreatic lesions increased almost to the values of normal pancreas. CONCLUSIONS: DWI is useful for detecting AIP and for evaluating the effect of steroid therapy. ADC values were significantly lower in AIP than in pancreatic cancer. An ADC cutoff value may be useful for distinguishing AIP from pancreatic cancer.

Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula and pancreatobiliary disease.

Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula (JPD) are observed in around 10-20% of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). They are acquired extraluminal outpouchings of the duodenal wall through 'locus minoris resistance' and their incidence increases with age. They have been studied mainly with regard to their association with pancreatobiliary disease. Choledocholithiasis is considered to be strongly associated with JPD, but the role of JPD in the development of cholecystolithiasis and pancreatitis is still disputable. Since JPD are located in the vicinity of the papilla of Vater, they not only cause mechanical compression of the bile duct but also induce dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi. They are considered to lead to bile stasis and to allow reflux from the duodenum into the bile duct, which results in an ascending infection of beta-glucuronidase-producing bacteria. The ERCP procedure can be hampered by JPD, although recent papers have reported no difference in the successful cannulation rate or complications between patients with JPD and those without JPD. Disorders caused by JPD are amenable to appropriate therapy, e.g. endoscopic sphincterotomy and surgical intervention.

A new embryological theory of the pancreatic duct system.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To clarify the anatomy of the pancreatic duct system and to investigate its embryology. METHODS: We reviewed pancreatograms of 256 patients with a normal pancreatic head and 36 cases of complete pancreas divisum. RESULTS: Accessory pancreatograms were divided into two patterns. The long-type accessory pancreatic duct (APD) forms a straight line and joins the main pancreatic duct (MPD) at the neck portion of the pancreas. The short-type APD joins the MPD near its first inferior branch. The short-type APD is less likely to have a long inferior branch arising from the APD. The length of the APD from the orifice to the first long inferior branch was similar in the short- and long-type APD. The first long inferior branch from the long-type APD passes through the MPD near the origin of the inferior branch from the MPD. Immunohistochemically, in the short-type APD, the MPD between the junction of the short-type APD and the neck portion originated from the ventral pancreas. CONCLUSION: The long-type APD represents a continuation of the main duct of the dorsal pancreatic bud. The short-type APD is very likely formed by the proximal main duct of the dorsal pancreatic bud and its long inferior branch, with the main duct of the dorsal pancreatic bud at the point of connection with the main duct of the ventral pancreatic bud being obliterated and replaced by this additional communication.

A patent accessory pancreatic duct prevents pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pancreatitis is the most common and feared complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We previously examined patency of the accessory pancreatic duct (APD) by dye injection endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). APD patency was found in 43% of 291 control cases who had no particular changes in the head of the pancreas compared to only 6% in patients with acute pancreatitis. APD patency was closely related with the shape of the terminal portion of the APD. This study aimed to clarify whether patency of the APD prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis. METHODS: We examined retrospectively the terminal shape of the APD by ERP in 34 patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis. Based on these data, patency of the APD was estimated from its terminal shape in patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis. RESULTS: The stick-type APD (p < 0.01), which indicated high patency, was less frequent, and the branch-type APD (p < 0.01) and halfway-type APD, or no APD (p < 0.01), which showed quite low patency, were more frequent in patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with controls. Accordingly, the estimated patency of the APD in post-ERCP pancreatitis patients was only 16%, which was significantly lower than the 43% in controls. There was no significant relationship between the estimated APD patency and the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated APD patency was significantly lower in patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis. A patent APD may function as a second drainage system to reduce the pressure in the main pancreatic duct and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Pancreatic diseases associated with pancreas divisum.

AIM: To clarify the features of acute or chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic tumors associated with complete and incomplete pancreas divisum. METHODS: Clinical features of pancreatic diseases associated with complete (n = 54) and incomplete (n = 50) pancreas divisum were examined. RESULTS: Acute and chronic pancreatitis occurred more frequently in patients with complete pancreas divisum (22.2%: 12/54, and 18.5%: 10/54, respectively) than in controls (5.6%: 183/3,246, and 4.9%: 159/3,246, respectively; p < 0.01). In 8 patients with chronic pancreatitis, the dorsal pancreatic duct was irregularly dilated from the orifice to the tail, whereas the ventral pancreatic duct was not dilated (isolated dorsal pancreatitis). None of the 12 complete pancreas divisum patients with acute pancreatitis consumed heavy or moderate amounts of alcohol. Although 6 of 10 patients with chronic pancreatitis consumed heavy or moderate amounts of alcohol, 31 of 32 patients with this malformation who did not exhibit pancreatitis consumed little or no alcohol. Chronic pancreatitis occurred more frequently in patients with incomplete pancreas divisum (18.0%: 9/50) than in controls (4.9%: 159/3,246; p < 0.01). Of 54 patients with complete pancreas divisum, 6 patients (11.1%) were associated with pancreatic tumor. All tumors developed from the dorsal pancreas of pancreas divisum. CONCLUSIONS: Complete pancreas divisum can be the sole etiology of acute or chronic pancreatitis. The presence of another factor, such as alcohol abuse, may be required for chronic pancreatitis to develop in some patients with complete or incomplete pancreas divisum. In complete pancreas divisum, the dorsal pancreatic duct might be a factor that promotes oncogenesis.

Laparoscopy-assisted transduodenal papillectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Basically, patients with cancer of the major duodenal papilla should undergo pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy; however, patients with adenoma or cancer in adenoma do not require prophylactic lymph node dissection, so they are indicated for limited resection of the major duodenal papilla. Endoscopic snare resection (ESR) has developed as limited resection of the major duodenal papilla; however, the ESR technique is still restricted to certain centers, because its outcome depends on the technical skills of the endoscopist. Therefore, we attempted laparoscopy-assisted transduodenal papillectomy (LATDP). METHODS: Ports were placed at the umbilicus, upper abdomen, left hypochondrium and right flank. Initially, kocherization was performed, followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and a C-tube was placed in the common bile duct through the cystic duct. Next, the port wound of the upper abdomen was extended 4 cm longitudinally, and only the descending part of the duodenum was extracted through this incision. The duodenum was opened opposite to the major duodenal papilla, and the major duodenal papilla was resected extracorporeally. After resection, the resection stumps of the bile duct and the pancreatic duct were sutured along with the duodenal mucosa. Lastly, the incision in the duodenum was stitched. RESULTS: We performed LATDP in 2 patients with cancer in adenoma. These patients had uneventful postoperative courses, as had patients who had previously undergone transduodenal papillectomy (TDP) by the open method in our hospital. CONCLUSION: LATDP is a feasible procedure that can be substituted for TDP and is less invasive after ESR.

FDG-PET/CT findings of autoimmune pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility in Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/ computed tomography (CT) in the management of patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), with special emphasis on differentiating AIP from pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODOLOGY: FDG-PET/CT findings of 10 AIP patients were compared with those of 14 PC patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between AIP and PC in early and delayed maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), and in the ratio of delayed to early SUV(max). Abnormal extrapancreatic FDG uptake was observed in 5 AIP patients, in the hilar lymph nodes (n = 4), mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 2), abdominal lymph nodes (n = 2), and bilateral salivary glands (n = 2). After steroid therapy, the abnormal FDG uptake in the pancreas disappeared almost completely in two patients, and the FDG uptake in the hilar, mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes decreased in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET/CT may be helpful to differentiate AIP from PC by assessing FDG-uptake patterns in the pancreas and extrapancreatic lesions, it may have the potential to assess the disease activity of AIP and its extrapancreatic lesions, and it may be useful as a monitoring marker for tapering or stopping steroid therapy.

Does a patent accessory pancreatic duct prevent acute pancreatitis?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The role of the accessory pancreatic duct (APD) in pancreatic pathophysiology has been unclear. We previously examined the patency of the APD in 291 control cases who had a normal pancreatogram in the head of the pancreas by dye-injection endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). APD patency was 43% and was closely related with the shape of the terminal portion of the APD. The present study aimed to clarify the clinical implications of a patent APD. METHODS: Based on the underlying data, the patency rate of the APD was estimated from the terminal shape of the APD on ERP in 167 patients with acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: In patients with acute pancreatitis, stick-type APD, spindle-type APD, and cudgel-type APD, which showed a high patency, were rare, and branch-type APD and halfway-type or no APD, which showed quite low patency, were frequent in acute pancreatitis patients. Accordingly, the estimated patency of the APD in acute pancreatitis patients was only 21%. There was no significant relationship between the estimated APD patency and etiology or severity of acute pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: The terminal shapes of the APD with low patency were frequent in acute pancreatitis patients, and estimated APD patency was only 21% in acute pancreatitis. A patent APD may function as a second drainage system to reduce the pressure in the main pancreatic duct and prevent acute pancreatitis.

Genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies GP2 gene risk variants for pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Japan. To identify risk loci, we perform a meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies comprising 2,039 pancreatic cancer patients and 32,592 controls in the Japanese population. Here, we identify 3 (13q12.2, 13q22.1, and 16p12.3) genome-wide significant loci (P < 5.0 × 10-8), of which 16p12.3 has not been reported in the Western population. The lead single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at 16p12.3 is rs78193826 (odds ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval = 1.29-1.66, P = 4.28 × 10-9), an Asian-specific, nonsynonymous glycoprotein 2 (GP2) gene variant. Associations between selected GP2 gene variants and pancreatic cancer are replicated in 10,822 additional cases and controls of East Asian origin. Functional analyses using cell lines provide supporting evidence of the effect of rs78193826 on KRAS activity. These findings suggest that GP2 gene variants are probably associated with pancreatic cancer susceptibility in populations of East Asian ancestry.