RESUMO
Surgery plays an important role in the management of high-grade gliomas (HGG) and imparts significant tumor-free and overall survival advantages. However HGG margins are often invisible, making their gross total resection (GTR) a difficult task. Hence intraoperative technology such as intraoperative fluorescence was a revolutionary discovery. A critical literature review revealed fluorescence improved the GTR of HGG from 36% using standard surgery to 74.5 and 84.4% using aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or fluorescein (FLCN), respectively. The differences between ALA-fluorescence image-guided neurosurgery (FIGS) and FLCN-FIGS in HGG were not statistically significant. However, the cost per quality added life years was US$16,218 and US$3181 for ALA-FIGS and FLCN-FIGS, respectively. Therefore, FIGS provided a reliable intraoperative tumor marker. Both ALA- and FLCN-FIGS significantly improved GTR and were cost-effective.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Glioma/cirurgia , Imagem Óptica , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Glioma/patologia , Humanos , Imagem Óptica/métodos , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the application of ablative neurosurgical treatments for intractable mental disorder throughout most of the past century, unequivocal evidence for efficacy has not been provided. AIMS: To review the status of ablative neurosurgery for mental disorder and to describe the activities of the Scottish national service. METHOD: Relevant literature is reviewed alongside a description of recent clinical activity. RESULTS: Neurosurgical treatment is offered to a small number of patients severely disabled by otherwise intractable mental disorder. There are inequalities in the strength of evidence to support the use of some of these procedures. The frequency and severity of adverse effects remains unclear. We are collecting data that should inform future practice. CONCLUSIONS: Modern neurosurgery can offer clinically meaningful symptom relief and improved function for 'untreatable' patients with chronic, severe depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. However, follow-up studies of greater rigour are required. The potential role of non-ablative alternatives remains unclear.