An algorithm for automated ROI definition in water or epoxy-filled NEMA NU-2 image quality phantoms.

Drawing regions of interest (ROIs) in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU-2 Image Quality (IQ) phantom is a time-consuming process that allows for interuser variability in the measurements. In order to reduce operator effort and allow batch processing of IQ phantom images, we propose a fast, robust, automated algorithm for performing IQ phantom sphere localization and analysis. The algorithm is easily altered to accommodate different configurations of the IQ phantom. The proposed algorithm uses information from both the PET and CT image volumes in order to overcome the challenges of detecting the smallest spheres in the PET volume. This algorithm has been released as an open-source plug-in to the Osirix medical image viewing software package. We test the algorithm under various noise conditions, positions within the scanner, air bubbles in the phantom spheres, and scanner misalignment conditions. The proposed algorithm shows run-times between 3 and 4 min and has proven to be robust under all tested conditions, with expected sphere localization deviations of less than 0.2 mm and variations of PET ROI mean and maximum values on the order of 0.5% and 2%, respectively, over multiple PET acquisitions. We conclude that the proposed algorithm is stable when challenged with a variety of physical and imaging anomalies, and that the algorithm can be a valuable tool for those who use the NEMA NU-2 IQ phantom for PET/CT scanner acceptance testing and QA/QC.

A Digital Reference Object to Analyze Calculation Accuracy of PET Standardized Uptake Value.

PURPOSE: To determine the extent of variations in computing standardized uptake value (SUV) by body weight (SUV(BW)) among different software packages and to propose a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) reference test object to ensure the standardization of SUV computation between medical image viewing workstations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research ethics board approval was not necessary because this study only evaluated images of a phantom. A synthetic set of positron emission tomographic (PET)/computed tomographic (CT) image data, called a digital reference object (DRO), with known SUV was created. The DRO was sent to 16 sites and evaluated on 21 different PET/CT display software packages. Users were asked to draw various regions of interest (ROIs) on specific features and report the maximum, minimum, mean, and standard deviation of the SUVs for each ROI. Numerical tolerances were defined for each metric, and the fraction of reported values within the tolerance was recorded, as was the mean, standard deviation, and range of the metrics. RESULTS: The errors in reported maximum SUV ranged from -37.8% to 0% for an isolated voxel with 4.11:1 target-to-background activity level, and errors in the reported mean SUV ranged from -1.6% to 100% for a region with controlled noise. There was also a range of errors in the less commonly used metrics of minimum SUV and standard deviation SUV. CONCLUSION: The variability of computed SUV(BW) between different software packages is substantial enough to warrant the introduction of a reference standard for medical image viewing workstations.

Technical Note: A digital reference object representing Hoffman's 3D brain phantom for PET scanner simulations.

PURPOSE: Physical and digital phantoms play a key role in the development and testing of nuclear medicine instrumentation and processing algorithms for clinical and research applications, including neuroimaging using positron emission tomography (PET). We have developed and tested a digital reference object (DRO) version of the original segmented magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data used for the three-dimensional (3D) PET brain phantom developed by Hoffman et al., which is used as the basis of a commercially available physical test phantom. METHODS: The DRO was constructed by subdividing the MRI image planes the original phantom was based on to create equal-thickness slices and re-labeling voxels. The digital data was then embedded in a PET Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format and tested for compliance. RESULTS: We then tested the DRO by comparing it to computed tomography (CT) images of the physical phantom summed to form composite slices with axial extent similar to the DRO, but with a factor of two better in-slice resolution. For composite slices, 91% of voxels were labeled in full agreement, 5% of the voxels were 50-75% accurate, and the remaining 4% of voxels had 25% or less agreement. CONCLUSIONS: This DRO can be used as an input for PET scanner simulation studies or for comparing simulations to measured Hoffman phantom images.

Evaluation of Cross-Calibrated 68Ge/68Ga Phantoms for Assessing PET/CT Measurement Bias in Oncology Imaging for Single- and Multicenter Trials.

Quantitative PET imaging is an important tool for clinical trials evaluating the response of cancers to investigational therapies. The standardized uptake value, used as a quantitative imaging biomarker, is dependent on multiple parameters that may contribute bias and variability. The use of long-lived, sealed PET calibration phantoms offers the advantages of known radioactivity activity concentration and simpler use than aqueous phantoms. We evaluated scanner and dose calibrator sources from two batches of commercially available kits, together at a single site and distributed across a local multicenter PET imaging network. We found that radioactivity concentration was uniform within the phantoms. Within the regions of interest drawn in the phantom images, coefficients of variation of voxel values were less than 2%. Across phantoms, coefficients of variation for mean signal were close to 1%. Biases of the standardized uptake value estimated with the kits varied by site and were seen to change in time by approximately ±5%. We conclude that these biases cannot be assumed constant over time. The kits provide a robust method to monitor PET scanner and dose calibrator biases, and resulting biases in standardized uptake values.

Designing a compact high performance brain PET scanner-simulation study.

The desire to understand normal and disordered human brain function of upright, moving persons in natural environments motivates the development of the ambulatory micro-dose brain PET imager (AMPET). An ideal system would be light weight but with high sensitivity and spatial resolution, although these requirements are often in conflict with each other. One potential approach to meet the design goals is a compact brain-only imaging device with a head-sized aperture. However, a compact geometry increases parallax error in peripheral lines of response, which increases bias and variance in region of interest (ROI) quantification. Therefore, we performed simulation studies to search for the optimal system configuration and to evaluate the potential improvement in quantification performance over existing scanners. We used the Cramér-Rao variance bound to compare the performance for ROI quantification using different scanner geometries. The results show that while a smaller ring diameter can increase photon detection sensitivity and hence reduce the variance at the center of the field of view, it can also result in higher variance in peripheral regions when the length of detector crystal is 15 mm or more. This variance can be substantially reduced by adding depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement capability to the detector modules. Our simulation study also shows that the relative performance depends on the size of the ROI, and a large ROI favors a compact geometry even without DOI information. Based on these results, we propose a compact 'helmet' design using detectors with DOI capability. Monte Carlo simulations show the helmet design can achieve four-fold higher sensitivity and resolve smaller features than existing cylindrical brain PET scanners. The simulations also suggest that improving TOF timing resolution from 400 ps to 200 ps also results in noticeable improvement in image quality, indicating better timing resolution is desirable for brain imaging.

A Virtual Clinical Trial of FDG-PET Imaging of Breast Cancer: Effect of Variability on Response Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: There is growing interest in using positron emission tomography (PET) standardized uptake values (SUVs) to assess tumor response to therapy. However, many error sources compromise the ability to detect SUV changes. We explore relationships between these errors and overall SUV variability. METHODS: We used simulations in a virtual clinical trial framework to study impacts of error sources from scanning and analysis effects on assessment of SUV changes. We varied tumor diameter, scan duration, pretherapy SUV, magnitude of change in SUV, image reconstruction filter, and SUV metric. Poisson noise was added to the raw data before image reconstruction. Variance from global sources of error, e.g., scanner calibration, was incorporated. Two thousand independent noisy sinograms per scenario were generated and reconstructed. We used SUVs to create receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to quantify ability to assess response. Integrating area under the ROC curve summarized ability to detect SUV changes. RESULTS: Scan duration and image reconstruction method had relatively little impact on ability to measure response. SUVMAX is nearly as effective as SUVMEAN, especially with increased image smoothing and despite size-matched region of interest placement. For an effective variability of 15%, we found the Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria for measuring response (±30%) similar to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria (±25%). CONCLUSIONS: For typical PET variance levels, tumor response must be 30% to 40% to be reliably determined using SUVs. PET scan duration and image reconstruction method had relatively little effect.