A descriptive study of educational outreach to promote use of quality improvement tools in primary care private practice.

The objective of this study was to describe the experience of a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) providing educational outreach to promote use of quality improvement (QI) tools in primary care private practice. Two QIO outreach workers conducted visits with physicians and targeted staff. Data were analyzed on physician demographics, visits, and use of QI tools using standard quantitative and qualitative methods. QIO staff frequently encountered difficulty in accessing physicians and administrative staff and reported many barriers to QI. Despite these challenges, outreach visits were associated with adoption of QI tools, and certain physician characteristics were associated with greater numbers of outreach visits and tools adopted. QIOs and other external parties who seek to improve quality of care in private practice primary care physician offices face challenges in gaining access to physicians and administrative personnel. Additional study is needed to better understand associations between physician characteristics, educational outreach visits, and adoption of QI tools.

Description and Impact Evaluation of a Statewide Collaboration to Reduce Preventable Hospital Readmissions.

This article describes how a Medicare-funded Quality Improvement Organization collaborated with a hospital association and multiple cross-continuum partners on a statewide effort to reduce hospital readmissions. Interventions included statewide education on quality improvement strategies and community-specific technical assistance on collaboration approaches, data collection and analysis, and selection and implementation of interventions. Fifteen communities, comprising 16 acute care hospitals, 119 nursing homes, 70 home health agencies, and 32 other health care or social service providers, actively participated over a 4.5-year period. Challenges included problems with end-of-life discussions (80.0%), physician engagement (70.0%), staffing (70.0%), and communication between settings (60.0%). Thirty-day all-cause readmission rates in fee-for-service Medicare patients decreased in most hospital service areas across the state (22/24), and the aggregate statewide readmission rate dropped from 15.2/1000 to 12.1/1000, a relative decrease of 20.3% ( P < .001). Despite these positive findings, the specific impact of this collaboration could not be determined because of multiple confounding interventions.

Profiling variations in outpatient care for Medicare beneficiaries in Connecticut.

Qualidigm, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Connecticut, is reporting the rates of four outpatient services for Medicare beneficiaries on its website (www.qualidigm.org). These measures include screening for breast cancer (mammography) and chronic disease management for diabetes (HbAlc, eye exam and lipid profile). Maps of Connecticut illustrate the rates for Whites and Non-whites by Health Service Area. The maps highlight variation across small local areas and between Whites and Non-whites. By reporting these rates publicly, Qualidigm hopes to facilitate ongoing efforts by community organizations and health care providers to make improvements in care, especially for the underserved populations throughout the state.

A collaborative initiative to improve the care of elderly Medicare patients with hypertension.

Qualidigm, the Connecticut Quality Improvement Organization (QIO), collaborated with 17 primary care physicians (PCPs) in private practice to improve the care of elderly patients with hypertension. Patients were identified from Medicare billing data and care was assessed from medical records. Improvement interventions included feedback of baseline performance data and provision of a variety of practice enhancing materials. Care was assessed for 590 patients in 1997 (16-47 patients/PCP) and 547 patients in 1999 (7-51 patients/PCP). Patient characteristics were similar in both periods. Use of recommended therapies and blood pressure control, ie, percent < 140/90 mm Hg, was low and did not improve significantly between the 2 periods (aggregate 39% in 1997 versus 42% in 1999; P = .24). Care of elderly patients with hypertension was not improved with a multifaceted QIO intervention. Additional study is required to determine incentives, barriers, and facilitating factors for quality improvement in the private practice primary care setting.

Reducing disparities in utilization of mamography: reaching dually eligible women in Connecticut.

This article describes a two-pronged intervention by the health care Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) for Connecticut to address the disparity in rates of mammography screening between women eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid (i.e., "dually eligible") and other Medicare beneficiaries. The interventions were directed beneficiaries. One intervention addressed information and access needs of the target population: an education session was followed by a mobile mammography van session at low-income housing sites in specific geographic areas. The second intervention was a culturally-sensitive direct mailing to dually eligible beneficiaries across the state. Implementation methods are described including: defining and identifying the target population; specifying the disparity; developing community collaboration; and testing the mail materials. Preliminary results of the education sessions and community testing of the direct mail materials generated information about the target population. Issues in implementation and analysis include: reaching the target population, building community relations, and developing design approaches to test the intervention.

Improving the quality of preventive cardiovascular care provided by primary care physicians: insights from a US Quality Improvement Organization.

BACKGROUND: During 2000-03, Qualidigm, a US Quality Improvement Organization, conducted a project to improve the care received by elderly Medicare patients with coronary artery disease or cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: We recruited primary care physicians in private practice in the state of Connecticut. Then, we identified approximately 30-50 patients per physician from the periods 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2000 and 1 November 2001 to 31 October 2002. We abstracted medical records to assess processes and outcomes of care, and we provided the physicians with performance data and a variety of practice-enhancing materials. The physicians utilized those materials that they perceived to be most helpful. RESULTS: We identified and recruited 974 primary care physicians to participate. Of these, 103 (10.6%) committed to participate, and 85 of the 103 completed the project. Among the intervention tools, physicians and their office personnel utilized personal digital assistants (PDAs) (36.5%) and patient education materials (34.1%) most commonly. Overall, quality of care improved for most physicians (mean quality score 62.0 to 67.8%, P < 0.001). However, not all improved, and most improvements were modest [mean absolute improvement in quality score 5.8%, standard deviation (SD) 6.8%]. CONCLUSIONS: Quality Improvement Organizations and others interested in improving outpatient quality of care face significant challenges in recruiting self-employed primary care physicians to quality improvement projects and in bringing about transformational change. Future primary care quality improvement projects should include careful assessments of practice-specific barriers, interventions that are linked to these barriers, and support of the practices on implementation.

Lessons learned from performance feedback by a quality improvement organization.

Performance feedback is a common quality improvement (QI) intervention strategy in the outpatient setting. This article describes the use by one quality improvement organization (QIO) of performance feedback to primary-care physicians with claims-based measures relating to diabetes, adult vaccinations, and mammography screening. Feedback from the physicians identified themes relating to data accuracy, methodology of the feedback reports, reasons for low performance rates, and suggestions on how the QIO could improve its intervention strategy. The article highlights the value of collecting and analyzing formative data on the process and offers specific recommendations to other QI professionals contemplating the use of claims data for performance feedback.

Physician attitudes concerning anticoagulation services in the long-term care setting.

OBJECTIVES: There is little experience in the use of specialized anticoagulation services in the long-term care setting. Even less is known about physician attitudes regarding these services. To examine this issue, we surveyed physicians caring for nursing home residents in a sample of long-term care facilities located in Connecticut. METHODS: We surveyed physicians providing care to nursing home residents of a convenience sample of 21 Connecticut nursing homes. (These facilities had participated in a quality assessment and improvement project on preventing strokes in nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation.) Physicians were requested to complete a structured questionnaire about the challenges to managing nursing home residents on warfarin therapy and preferences concerning the use of an anticoagulation service to manage warfarin therapy in this setting. RESULTS: A total of 245 physicians were asked to participate in the survey, and 114 (47%) responded between November 5, 1999 and January 14, 2000. Of the 114 physicians who returned the survey, 91 reported that they currently cared for residents in long-term care facilities and thus completed the questionnaire. The majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that an anticoagulation service would reduce the workload on physicians, increase the costs of care for nursing home residents on warfarin, and increase the percent of time that nursing home residents on warfarin are maintained in the target therapeutic range. Most physicians disagreed or strongly disagreed with statements suggesting an anticoagulation service would decrease the costs of care for nursing home residents on warfarin, reduce the liability of the prescribing physician, interfere with their ability to care for patients on warfarin therapy, and reduce the risk of warfarin-related bleeding. Forty-five percent of respondents agreed with a statement that an anticoagulation service would intrude on physician decision-making. Only about half (53%) of the respondents indicated that they would or might utilize an anticoagulation service for managing their long-term care patients on warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a specialized anticoagulation service to manage warfarin therapy is a systems-level approach with the potential to improve the effectiveness and safety of this treatment. Physician skepticism regarding the usefulness of anticoagulation services will only be overcome by subjecting this approach to rigorous evaluation and by assuring physicians of their ongoing involvement in decision-making regarding warfarin therapy in their patients.