Decreasing Goal Oxygen Saturations in Bronchiolitis Is Associated With Decreased Length of Stay.

OBJECTIVES: For patients hospitalized with bronchiolitis, many hospitals have implemented clinical practice guidelines to decrease variability in care. Our hospital updated its bronchiolitis clinical pathway by lowering goal oxygen saturation from 90% to 88%. We compared clinical outcomes before and after this change within the context of the pathway update. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients <24 months old admitted to a pediatric tertiary care center from 2019 to 2021 with bronchiolitis. Patients with congenital heart disease, asthma, home oxygen, or admitted to an ICU were excluded. The data were stratified for patients admitted before and after the clinical pathway update. Statistical methods consisted of 2 group comparisons using the χ-square test for categorical variables, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables, and multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1386 patients were included, 779 preupdate and 607 postupdate. There was no statistically significant difference in the admission rate of patients presenting to the emergency department with bronchiolitis between the 2 groups (P value .60). The median time to room air was 40.0 hours preupdate versus 30.0 hours postupdate (P value < .001). The median length of stay was 48.0 hours preupdate versus 41.0 hours postupdate (P value < .001). Readmission rate was 2.7% within 7 days of discharge preupdate, and 2.1% postupdate (P value .51). CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing goal oxygen saturation to 88% was associated with a statistically significant decrease in time spent on oxygen and length of stay for patients admitted with bronchiolitis with no increase in readmissions.

Pediatric primary care providers' perspectives regarding hospital discharge communication: a mixed methods analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Effective communication between inpatient and outpatient providers may mitigate risks of adverse events associated with hospital discharge. However, there is an absence of pediatric literature defining effective discharge communication strategies at both freestanding children's hospitals and general hospitals. The objectives of this study were to assess associations between pediatric primary care providers' (PCPs) reported receipt of discharge communication and referral hospital type, and to describe PCPs' perspectives regarding effective discharge communication and areas for improvement. METHODS: We administered a questionnaire to PCPs referring to 16 pediatric hospital medicine programs nationally. Multivariable models were developed to assess associations between referral hospital type and receipt and completeness of discharge communication. Open-ended questions asked respondents to describe effective strategies and areas requiring improvement regarding discharge communication. Conventional qualitative content analysis was performed to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: Responses were received from 201 PCPs, for a response rate of 63%. Although there were no differences between referral hospital type and PCP-reported receipt of discharge communication (relative risk 1.61, 95% confidence interval 0.97-2.67), PCPs referring to general hospitals more frequently reported completeness of discharge communication relative to those referring to freestanding children's hospitals (relative risk 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.51). Analysis of free text responses yielded 4 major themes: 1) structured discharge communication, 2) direct personal communication, 3) reliability and timeliness of communication, and 4) communication for effective postdischarge care. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights potential differences in the experiences of PCPs referring to general hospitals and freestanding children's hospitals, and presents valuable contextual data for future quality improvement initiatives.

Pediatric discharge content: a multisite assessment of physician preferences and experiences.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Professional medical societies endorse prompt, consistent discharge communication to primary care providers (PCPs) on discharge. However, evidence is limited about what clinical elements to communicate. Our main goal was to identify and compare the clinical elements considered by PCPs and pediatric hospitalists to be essential to communicate to PCPs within 2 days of pediatric hospital discharge. A secondary goal was to describe experiences of the PCPs and pediatric hospitalists regarding sending and receiving discharge information. METHODS: A survey of physician preferences and experiences regarding discharge communication was sent to 320 PCPs who refer patients to 16 hospitals, with an analogous survey sent to 147 hospitalists. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and χ² analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 201 PCPs (63%) and 71 hospitalists (48%) responded to the survey. Seven clinical elements were reported as essential by >75% of both PCPs and hospitalists: dates of admission and discharge; discharge diagnoses; brief hospital course; discharge medications; immunizations given during hospitalization; pending laboratory or test results; and follow-up appointments. PCPs reported reliably receiving discharge communication significantly less often than hospitalists reported sending it (71.8% vs 85.1%; P < .01), and PCPs considered this communication to be complete significantly less often than hospitalists did (64.9% vs 79.1%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: We identified 7 core clinical elements that PCPs and hospitalists consider essential in discharge communication. Consistently and promptly communicating at least these core elements after discharge may enhance PCP satisfaction and patient-level outcomes. Reported rates of transmission and receipt of this information were suboptimal and should be targeted for improvement.