Strong ALK and PD-L1 positive IHC expression related ALK amplification in an advanced lung sarcomatoid carcinoma: A therapeutic trap?

OBJECTIVES: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is considered as a screening method for ALK rearrangement thanks to its excellent sensitivity. Strong marking on immunohistochemistry give the go-ahead to start ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK TKI). Lack of therapeutic response may then lead to the suspicion of molecular alterations other than ALK rearrangements. METHODS: We present a patient with strong ALK and PD-L1 positive IHC expression lung sarcomatoid carcinoma with initial life-threatening disease progression after beginning ALK TKI. We also review the literature to summarize ALK amplification clinical features and therapeutic management in lung cancers. RESULTS: Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) revealed ALK amplification on the initial anatomopathological samples. Lack of ALK rearrangement and strong PD-L1 positive IHC expression led to the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) as a second line of treatment, with an excellent response. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that IHC positive test, in these cases, must be interpreted with caution. FISH analysis has to be recommended to confirm IHC results in case of unusual phenotype, such as smoker or lung cancer other than adenocarcinoma. Although lung carcinoma with ALK rearrangement seems to be not sensitive to ICI, further investigations should be conducted on other types of ALK molecular alterations. ALK amplifications, as observed in the present case, should not be an impediment to taking into account the PD-L1 marking for the initiation of treatment by immunotherapy.

[Updates on gemcitabine at the American Society of Clinical Oncology congress (ASCO, 2002) ]. / Actualités sur la gemcitabine lors du congrès de l'American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO, 2002).

The efficacy of gemcitabine containing regimens has been explored in a large number of studies presented at ASCO 2002. The activity of gemcitabine-platinum based combinations was confirmed in lung cancer and bladder cancer. In pancreatic cancer, single agent gemcitabine remains the reference treatment, but newer combinations with oxaliplatin or docetaxel show promising activity in phase II trials and are currently being evaluated in phase III. Gemcitabine has demonstrated promising activity in phase II studies in metastatic breast cancer and gynaecologic tumors; phase III trials are ongoing. Concomitant chemo-radiation using gemcitabine as a radiosensitizer have been shown to be highly effective in pancreatic and in bladder cancer and deserve further investigation. The growing interest in gemcitabine-based combinations in various tumor types together with the results presented at ASCO 2002 confirm the broad range of activity of this drug. This is a review of papers presented at ASCO 2002.

Routine administration of a single dose of cisplatin ≥ 75 mg/m2 after short hydration in an outpatient lung-cancer clinic.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is a pivotal drug in combined chemotherapy for non-small cell and small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC or SCLC), but its renal toxicity limits its use. Current guidelines recommend 24 h hydration: thus hospitalization is required. The aim of this retrospective study was to confirm the safety of short hydration before giving an intermediate-to-high dose of cisplatin in an outpatient clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients eligible had NSCLC or SCLC and were being treated with a chemotherapy regimen that included cisplatin ≥ 75 mg/m(2). They were given the same short hydration protocol for 1 day. Nephrotoxicity was defined as ≥ grade 1 according to NCIC common toxicity criteria. Predictive factors for nephrotoxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-seven consecutive patients (median age 58 years, range: 25-81) were reviewed. Twenty-one patients (6%) had ≥ grade 1 nephrotoxicity and all except one had grade 1 toxicity according to NCIC criteria for common toxicity (SC < 1,5 N). Predictive factors independently associated with nephrotoxicity included associated co-morbid conditions (hypertension, diabetes, heart disease) (OR = 4.97 CI 95% [1.8-13.7] P = 0.002), initial serum creatinine ≥ 100 µmol/L (OR = 8.3 CI 95% [2.55-27.4] P = 0.0005), and dose cycle of cisplatin ≥ 100 mg/m(2) (OR = 10.8 CI 95% [3.6-32.5] P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Rapid outpatient administration of a single dose of cisplatin at ≥ 75 mg/m(2) is feasible without a high risk of nephrotoxicity.

Skin toxicities compromise prolonged pemetrexed treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Pemetrexed is approved to treat non-small cell lung cancer and has an overall favorable toxicity profile. A case of pemetrexed-induced cutaneous adverse events (CAE), i.e., periorbital edema with conjunctivitis and edema of the limbs, leading to severe fluid retention, was diagnosed in our unit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for CAEs. METHODS: Patients treated with pemetrexed were identified from a prospective cohort. To detect pemetrexed-associated CAEs, questionnaires were answered by patients and the referring oncologist. RESULTS: Included were 107 patients treated with four cycles or more of pemetrexed. Pemetrexed-induced CAEs were observed in 37 of 107 (35%) total patients (TPs) and 25 of 47 (53%) alive patients (APs). Conjunctivitis was the most frequent CAE: 27 of 107 (25%) in TPs and 21 of 47 (44%) in APs. Periorbital edema occurred in 16 of 107 (15%) TPs and 14 of 47 (30%) APs. Limb edema was present in 14 of 107 (13%) TPs and 12 of 47 (25%) APs. Only two cases of CAE influenced pemetrexed treatment. No significant differences in age, body surface area, smoking status, and performance status were detected. Patients with CAE had more cycles of pemetrexed (7 versus 5.5; p = 0.028). In univariate and multivariate analyses, gender ratio was statistically different (p = 0.031): 48% (12/25) of women in the CAE group versus only 18% (4/18) in the control group. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed induces frequent conjunctivitis, peripheral edema, and edema of the limbs. Female gender seems to be an independent risk for CAE. CAEs are frequently disabling and symptomatic treatment should be proposed.