Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Asthma ; 60(9): 1761-1766, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36847658

RESUMO

AIM: Maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) is one of the pulmonary function tests that report small airway disease. Our study aimed to investigate the role of MMEF values in asthma control, the prevalence of small airway disease, and their effect on asthma control in patients with asthma with normal forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) values. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Patients who presented to the Chest Diseases outpatient clinic of our hospital between 2018 and 2019 and were diagnosed as having asthma were included in the study. The characteristics of the patients, pulmonary function tests, their asthma treatment, and asthma control test (ACT) scores were recorded. Patients with FEV1 <80 in the pulmonary function test, those with additional lung disease, those who had an attack in the last 4 weeks, and patients who smoked were excluded from the study. MMEF <65 was defined as small airway disease. RESULTS: The MMEF% and MMEF (L/s) values of the group with uncontrolled asthma were found to be statistically significantly lower than those of the controlled asthma group (p = 0.016 and p = 0.003, respectively). MMEF% and MMEF (L/s) values in those with wheezing were found to be significantly lower compared with those without wheezing (p = 0.025 and p = 0.049, respectively). The MMEF% and MMEF (L/s) values of the patients with nocturnal symptoms were found to be statistically significantly lower than in patients without nocturnal symptoms (p = 0.023 and p = 0.041, respectively). ACT values of patients with MMEF <65 were found to be statistically lower than those of patients with MMEF >65 (0.047). CONCLUSION: Considering small airway disease in patients with asthma may be beneficial in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Asma , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/diagnóstico , Sons Respiratórios , Volume Expiratório Forçado
2.
Bratisl Lek Listy ; 123(6): 421-427, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35576543

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed to determine the relationship between 25-OH vitamin D levels, inflammatory parameters of neutrophil­to­lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet­to­lymphocyte ratio (PLR), c­reactive protein (CRP) levels and the disease severity of COVID-19 infection. BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 while identifying the clinical course and prognosis. The effect of vitamin D deficiency on contribution to inflammation in COVID-19 is unclear. METHODS: Based on the classification of the clinical course of COVID-19, the patients were divided into three groups, i.e., with mild (Group 1), moderate (Group 2) and severe/critical cases (Group 3). The 25-OH vitamin D values were defined as deficient, insufficient or normal. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution rates of 25-OH vitamin D levels (p>0.05) between the groups. Inflammatory parameters in Group 3 were statistically significantly higher as compared to Groups1 and 2 (p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that NLR was an independent predictor of disease severity. CONCLUSION: There is no relationship between the severity of COVID-19 infection and 25-OH vitamin D deficiency. Inflammatory parameters are associated with the disease severity, while NLR is an independent predictor of severe COVID-19. There was no correlation between 25-OH vitamin D and inflammatory markers (Tab. 4, Fig. 1, Ref. 38).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Deficiência de Vitamina D , Humanos , Inflamação , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Vitamina D , Deficiência de Vitamina D/complicações , Vitaminas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA