[Supporting rehabilitation facilities in implementing diversity-sensitive care: Development of the DiversityKAT manual]. / Unterstützung von Rehabilitationseinrichtungen bei der Umsetzung einer diversitätssensiblen Versorgung: Entwicklung der DiversityKAT-Handreichung.

BACKGROUND: Expectations regarding health care including rehabilitation differ depending on age, gender, and also the migration history of the patient population. To meet the diverse expectations, health care needs to be diversity-sensitive, which can have a positive effect on the utilization and outcomes of care. Diversity-sensitive care, however, should take into consideration not only the expectations of diverse patient groups but also the opportunities and challenges offered by diversity of staff. Managers of health care facilities and health care staff in Germany are well aware of the need for diversity-sensitive care, but corresponding measures, so far, have been applied rarely and only unsystematically. The aim of the study was to develop a manual consisting of a catalogue of instruments and a guideline that can support rehabilitation facilities in implementing diversity-sensitive care. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used for the study. Based on a scoping review, suitable instruments (n=34) were identified that can be used for the implementation of diversity-sensitive health care. Consensus on a draft of the manual was then reached in seven focus group discussions with health care staff (n=44) and a discussion circle consisting of n=5 representatives of the rehabilitation providers. RESULTS: The DiversityKAT manual, which was developed in a participatory manner, presents diversity-sensitive tools, including instructions, questionnaires, checklists and concepts that can be used to take into account the diversity of needs and expectations in everyday health care. In line with the feedback from health care staff, the manual includes information that can be used as a step-by-step guide to select and implement appropriate tools. At the request of the staff and the rehabilitation providers, exemplary case descriptions were added to present the use of selected instruments in specific situations. A matrix was developed for purposes of quick orientation and pre-selection of suitable instruments. DISCUSSION: Through practice-oriented advice and low-threshold guidance, the DiversityKAT-manual can increase user orientation in rehabilitation but needs to be further examined in future evaluation studies.

Participatory development of a manual for the implementation of diversity-sensitive palliative and hospice care in Germany: a mixed-methods study protocol.

BACKGROUND: The diversity of the population is associated with different needs and expectations towards palliative and hospice care. Current approaches available in Germany generally fall short in addressing the role of diversity and intersectionality in this health care setting and healthcare facilities struggle with organizational difficulties and missing information on how to implement corresponding diversity-sensitive measures. The present study aims to develop a hands-on manual that enables providers of hospice and palliative care to implement measures and strategies for diversity-sensitive care, while taking into account the perspective of healthcare users and explicitly including vulnerable and minority patient groups. METHODS: A participatory approach is used to co-create the aforementioned manual using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. First, based on a systematic analysis of existing measures, an initial draft of the manual will be developed. Subsequently, an online survey will be conducted among all hospice and palliative care providers in Germany (n = 2,823). Based on the results of the survey, 12 to 15 qualitative problem-centered interviews will be conducted with employees of selected providers who took part in the survey. Results of the survey and the qualitative interviews will be integrated and analyzed. In parallel to the development and research process, a comprehensive dissemination strategy will be developed. DISCUSSION: The manual will assist providers of palliative and hospice care in determining goals, needs, and available resources in order to utilize patient-centered and diversity-sensitive measures to meet a wide range of expectations. It can also be informative for providers in other countries. The participatory co-development approach ensures the practical relevance of the manual, while the mixed-methods design allows for targeted input on the manual's usability, acceptance, and viability as a supportive tool.

[Implementation Strategies of Diversity-Sensitive Health Care and Administration - A Nationwide Postal Survey of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities]. / Umsetzungsstrategien einer diversitätssensiblen Gesundheitsversorgung und Unternehmensführung ­ Eine bundesweite postalische Befragung von Rehabilitationseinrichtungen.

BACKGROUND: Diversity characteristics such as disability, gender, age or migration background are associated with different expectations towards health care. If these are not sufficiently considered in rehabilitative care, this may have a negative impact on the satisfaction with and outcomes of health care. Sensitivity towards the diversity of patients can promote patient-centered health care by helping to address different needs and expectations. The aim of the present study was to examine what measures inpatient rehabilitation facilities in Germany use to provide diversity-sensitive health care and which barriers prevent their proper implementation. METHODS: Between May and August 2019, administrative managers of rehabilitation facilities were invited to participate in a nationwide postal questionnaire survey (n=1,233). The questionnaire included questions on addressing the diversity of employees and rehabilitation patients. Responses were received from a total of 223 inpatient rehabilitation facilities (response rate: 18.9%). Results were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: The survey shows that diversity-sensitive health care is a relevant topic for many rehabilitation facilities. It is regarded particularly important for the satisfaction of rehabilitation patients, treatment outcomes and employee satisfaction. Obstacles to the implementation of diversity-sensitive care comprise a lack of incentives on the part of health care organization, a lack of financial resources and organizational difficulties. DISCUSSION: The majority of the administrative managers surveyed acknowledge the relevance of diversity-sensitive care. Instruments enabling it, however, are used only sparingly and unsystematically. To promote diversity-sensitive care, health care facilities need support in competence building and in selecting and implementing appropriate measures. A handbook with instructions on how diversity-sensitive care can be implemented can contribute to that goal.

What are the reasons for refusing a COVID-19 vaccine? A qualitative analysis of social media in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination against COVID-19 has been available in Germany since December 2020. However, about 30% of the population report not wanting to be vaccinated. In order to increase the willingness of the population to get vaccinated, data on the acceptance of vaccination and its influencing factors are necessary. Little is known about why individuals refuse the COVID-19 vaccination. The aim of this study was to investigate the reasons leading to rejecting vaccination, based on posts from three social media sites. METHODS: The German-language versions of Instagram, Twitter and YouTube were searched regarding negative attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. Data was extracted until a saturation effect could be observed. The data included posts created from January 20, 2020 to May 2, 2021. This time frame roughly covers the period from the first reports of the spread of SARS-CoV-2 up to the general availability of vaccines against COVID-19 in Germany. We used an interpretive thematic approach to analyze the data and to inductively generate codes, subcategories and categories. RESULTS: Based on 333 posts written by 323 contributing users, we identified six main categories of reasons for refusing a COVID-19 vaccination: Low perceived benefit of vaccination, low perceived risk of contracting COVID-19, health concerns, lack of information, systemic mistrust and spiritual or religious reasons. The analysis reveals a lack of information among users and the spread of misinformation with regard to COVID-19 and vaccination. Users feel inadequately informed about vaccination or do not understand the information available. These information gaps may be related to information not being sufficiently sensitive to the needs of the target group. In addition to limited information for the general population, misinformation on the internet can also be an important reason for refusing vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The study emphasizes the relevance of providing trustworthy and quality-assured information on COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination to all population groups. In addition, vaccinations should be easily accessible in order to promote the population's willingness to be vaccinated.

Perceived controllability of a SARS-CoV-2 infection: an investigation of intersectional differences.

BACKGROUND: The perceived ability to influence an infection with SARS-CoV-2 has an impact on compliance with protective measures. Factors influencing perceived controllability are not yet fully known. The aim of this study was to identify intersectional differences in perceived controllability. Insights into these intersectional differences could help to develop user-centered strategies to improve the acceptance of protective measures. METHODS: Data from the seventh wave of the German Ageing Survey (DEAS) was used to investigate differences in the population regarding the perceived controllability. The role of socio-demographic and socio-economic predictors was investigated using multivariable linear regression modeling. Intersectional differences were examined using interaction terms. RESULTS: Information on 4,823 respondents aged 46 to 100 years were available, of which 50.9% were female. Migration status (yes vs. no: ß = -0.27; 95%-CI = -0.48,-0.06), education level (high vs. low: ß = 0.31; 95%-CI: 0.08, 0.55) and employment status (retired vs. employed: ß = 0.33; 95%-CI: 0.19, 0.48) were found to be significantly influencing perceived controllability. Interaction effects were found with respect to sex and migration status, with migrant women rating their perceived controllability lower than non-migrant women (ß = -0.51; 95%-CI = -0.80, -0.21), while no differences were evident between migrant and non-migrant men (ß = -0.02; 95%-CI = -0.32, 0.28). Further intersectional differences were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that intersectional differences in perceived controllability occur especially between migrant and non-migrant women. Possible causes may lie in language barriers, which in connection with lower health literacy may affect perceived controllability. Dedicated efforts to improve controllability among older adults, those with lower educational attainment and migrant women are warranted.

Diversity-sensitive measures in German hospitals - attitudes, implementation, and barriers according to administration managers.

BACKGROUND: Populations have varying needs and expectations concerning health care that result from diversity characteristics such as a migrant background, gender identity, disability, and age. These needs and expectations must be considered to ensure adequate utilization and quality of health services. Approaches to address diversity do exist, however, little is known about the extent to which they are implemented by health care facilities. The present study aims to examine, which measures and structures hospitals in Germany employ to address diversity, as well as which barriers they encounter in doing so. METHODS: A mixed-mode survey among administration managers of all registered German hospitals (excluding rehabilitation hospitals; n = 1125) was conducted between May and October 2019 using pen-and-paper and online questionnaires. Results were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Data from n = 112 hospitals were available. While 57.1% of hospitals addressed diversity in their mission statement and 59.9% included diversity considerations in quality management, dedicated working groups and diversity commissioners were less prevalent (15.2% each). The majority of hospitals offered multi-lingual admission and exit interviews (59.8%), treatments or therapies (57.1%), but only few had multi-lingual meal plans (12.5%) and seminars or presentations (11.6%). While 41.1% of the hospitals offered treatment and/or nursing exclusively by staff of the same sex, only 17.0% offered group therapies for both sexes separately. According to the managers, the main barriers were a lack of financial resources (54.5%), a lack of incentives from the funding providers (49.1%), and organizational difficulties (45.5%). Other reported barriers were a lack of conviction of the necessity among decision makers (28.6%) and a lack of motivation among staff members (19.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Administration managers from only a small proportion of hospitals participated in our survey on diversity sensitivity. Even hospitals of those who did are currently not adequately addressing the diversity of staff members and patients. Most hospitals address diversity on an ideational level, practical measures are not widely implemented. Existing measures suggest that most hospitals have no overarching concept to address diversity in a broader sense. The main reported barriers relate to economic aspects, a lack of support in organizing and implementing corresponding measures and a lack of awareness or motivation.

Expectations, concerns and experiences of rehabilitation patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: a qualitative analysis of online forum posts.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic, as well as efforts to prevent its spread, have had a strong impact on the delivery of rehabilitative services in Germany. While several studies have addressed the impact of these developments on health service providers and COVID-19 patients, little is known about its impact on patients in need of rehabilitative treatment because of other conditions. This study aims to identify expectations, concerns and experiences of rehabilitation patients related to service delivery in this situation. METHODS: Using a qualitative study design, user posts from six German online forums between March and Mid-November 2020 were systematically searched with respect to experiences, concerns and expectations of health care users toward receiving rehabilitative treatment. We used qualitative content analysis with inductive coding as our methodological approach. RESULTS: Users fearing physical or psychological impairment were concerned about not receiving timely or effective treatment due to closed hospitals, reduced treatments and limited admissions. In contrast, patients more concerned about getting infected with COVID-19 worried about the effectiveness of protective measures and being denied postponement of treatment by the funding bodies. During their stay, some patients reported feeling isolated due to contact restrictions and did not feel their treatment was effective, while others reported being satisfied and praised hospitals for their efforts to ensure the safety of the patients. Many patients reported communication problems before and during their treatment, including concerns about the safety and effectiveness of their treatment, as well as financial concerns and worries about future treatments. Several users felt that their concerns were disregarded by the hospitals and the funding bodies, leaving them feeling distressed, insecure and dissatisfied. CONCLUSIONS: While some users report only minor concerns related to the pandemic and its impact on rehabilitation, others report strong concerns relating not only to their own health and safety, but also to financial aspects and their ability to work. Many users feel ignored and disregarded, showing a strong need for more coordinated strategies and improved communication specifically with funding bodies like health insurance companies and the German pension funds.

Is exposure to secondhand smoke associated with current depression (PHQ-8) among never-smokers? Results from a survey among German adults.

BACKGROUND: Findings on the association between exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) and depression are contradictory. Comparability of existing research is limited due to varied methods and measures. This study examines the potential association between exposure to SHS and depression and a potential moderation by sex using representative data from Germany. METHODS: For our study, we used data from the German Health Update (GEDA) 2014/2015 on n = 10,274 never-smokers. We calculated a logistic regression model with an interaction term for potential sex-exposure interactions. We used the self-reported duration of exposure to predict current depression of any type as defined by the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-8 (score ≥ 10), accounting for a large number of confounders. RESULTS: In our sample, prevalence of depression was 8.8% in women and 5.3% in men. 90.4% were never or almost never exposed to SHS, while 7.1% were exposed < 1 h per day and around 2.5% reported being exposed for ≥1 h per day. While SHS exposure for < 1 h per day was not associated with current depression (OR = 1.54; 95%-CI: 0.93-1.61), SHS exposure for at least 1 h per day was associated with increased odds for current depression (OR = 1.59; 95%-CI: 1.08-2.35). No sex-specific differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of SHS exposure are associated with current depression, although the nature and direction of the association are still unclear. We identified no differences in the association between men and women. More studies, particularly using longitudinal data, are needed to determine the nature of the association.

[Rational Use of Antibiotics Among Turkish Migrants In Germany: Knowledge, Attitudes and Interaction With Physicians and Pharmacists]. / Antibiotikanutzung bei Menschen mit türkischem Migrationshintergrund ­ Wissen, Einstellungen und Interaktion mit ÄrztInnen und ApothekerInnen.

OBJECTIVES: Due to strong transnational ties, the use of and demand for antibiotics among Turkish migrants in Germany may be influenced by cultural aspects of antibiotic use in Turkey. Research on the use of antibiotics among Turkish migrants in Germany, however, is scarce. The aim of this study was to find out how Turkish migrants in Germany use antibiotics, whether and how knowledge, underlying motives and attitudes influence demand and how Turkish migrants interact with medical professionals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a qualitative approach, behavioural patterns and logic of action of adult Turkish migrants were identified. We carried out semi-structured focus group interviews with adults of Turkish origin residing in Germany and expert interviews with family physicians and pharmacists. The interviews were analysed by means of content analysis. RESULTS: While younger migrants had a generally positive, but cautious attitude towards the use of antibiotics, older migrants often showed exaggerated, unrealistic expectations resulting from a lack of factual knowledge. Overall, participants adopted a passive role in the patient-provider relationship. This led to a perpetuation of significant knowledge gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Older Turkish migrants who have less factual knowledge show exaggerated expectations concerning the effectiveness of antibiotics. In conjunction with a passive patient role, resulting in information needs not being satisfied, this can affect the patient-provider relationship. A more active communication by physicians and information materials sensitive to the needs of migrants can positively influence the interaction between migrant patients and medical professionals.

Oral health behaviour in migrant and non-migrant adults in Germany: the utilization of regular dental check-ups.

BACKGROUND: Migrants in many European countries including Germany tend to utilize preventive measures less frequently than the majority population. Little is known about the dental health of migrants as well as about their oral health behaviour, particularly in the adult population. The aim of this study was to examine differences in the uptake of annual dental check-ups in adult migrants and non-migrants in Germany. METHODS: We used data from the cross-sectional survey 'German Health Update 2010' conducted by the Robert Koch Institute (n = 22,050). Data from 21,741 German-speaking respondents with information on the use of dental check-ups was available, of which 3404 (15.7%) were migrants. Multiple logistic regression models were applied to adjust for demographic and socioeconomic confounders, including the place of residence as well as type of health insurance. RESULTS: Migrants were generally younger, had a lower socioeconomic status and showed a lower utilization of dental check-ups. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for utilization was 0.67 (95%-CI = 0.61-0.73). After adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic confounders the chance only increased slightly (adjusted OR = 0.71; 95%-CI = 0.65-0.77). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis shows that migration status is associated with a reduced chance of attending dental check-ups, independently of demographic and socioeconomic factors. The influence of other factors, such as type of health insurance and place of residence had also no influence on the association. Migrants are exposed to different barriers in the health care system, comprising the patient, provider and system level. Further studies need to examine the relevant barriers for the uptake of preventive dental services in order to devise appropriate migrant- sensitive measures of dental prevention.

Perspectives of physicians and pharmacists on rational use of antibiotics in Turkey and among Turkish migrants in Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance may result from inappropriate use of antibiotics in health care. Turkey is one of the countries with the highest antibiotic consumption in the world. Considering the role of transnational ties between Turkish migrants and their social contacts in Turkey, the attitudes and behaviors relating to rational antibiotic use in Turkey can also affect the use of antibiotics by Turkish migrants residing abroad. This study explores physicians' and pharmacists' experiences and perspectives on rational antibiotic use among Turkish adults in Turkey and among Turkish migrants in Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands, three European countries with large populations of Turkish migrants. METHODS: Following a qualitative study design using convenience and snowball sampling, in-depth interviews with 21 family physicians and 24 pharmacists were conducted in the aforementioned countries. We transcribed all interviews verbatim and performed content analysis separately in the countries, followed by translation, pooling and joint interpretation of the findings. RESULTS: Physicians and pharmacists encountered irrational use of antibiotics among their patients in Turkey. Physicians interviewed in the three European countries explained that Turkish migrants differ from non-migrants with respect to their attitudes towards antibiotics, for example by more often expecting to be prescribed antibiotics. All physicians and pharmacists in the selected countries reported to inform their patients on how to use antibiotics upon prescription; however, Turkish migrants' poor language proficiency was considered as a substantial communication barrier by the physicians and pharmacists interviewed in the European countries. CONCLUSIONS: The study illustrated some aspects of irrational antibiotic use among the population in Turkey and Turkish migrants in selected European countries. It emphasized the need for closer community participation, adequate information campaigns, as well as in-service training of health care providers in Turkey. The strategies and interventions on rational antibiotic use should also be supported and encouraged by health care providers, who need to reach out to people with various cultural backgrounds.

Pictorial Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life. Development and Pre-Test of the PictoQOL Questionnaire.

The aim of the present study was to develop a pictorial questionnaire for the assessment of health-related quality of life (PictoQOL) and to examine its content validity and usability across three exemplary population groups of different origin residing in Germany (non-migrants, Turkish migrants and Arabic-speaking migrants). A mixed-methods design combining qualitative and quantitative methods was used, comprising 6 focus group discussions with a total of 17 participants, 37 cognitive interviews and a quantitative pretest with 15 individuals. The PictoQOL consists of a pictorial representation of a total of 15 different situations. Using a visual Likert scale, respondents indicate how much each situation applies to them. Some representations proved to be culturally sensitive and were adapted. Respondents found the use of an additional graphic layer in the form of symbols in addition to pictures helpful for interpretation. The PictoQOL is considered to allow a more accessible assessment and better comparability of HRQOL across different population groups regardless of their literacy level. It is therefore considered to be superior to existing instruments for routine use in health research and practice. Future studies need to examine its convergent and factorial validity.

Association between second-hand smoke exposure and depression and its moderation by sex: Findings from a nation-wide population survey in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Findings on the association between exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) and depression are ambiguous. Similarly, results concerning sex-specific associations are contradictory. Using large and representative survey data from Germany, we examined whether SHS exposure is associated with depressive symptoms/major depression (MDD) and whether this association differs by sex. METHODS: We pooled data from three waves of the German Health Update telephone surveys from 2009-2012 on 28,670 never-smokers. Information on SHS exposure was based on self-reports. The outcome was a reported diagnosis of a depressive episode/MDD in the last 12 months before the survey. Logistic regression with a sex-by-SHS interaction term adjusted for socioeconomic and health-related confounders was conducted. Interaction effects were evaluated based on average marginal effects (AME). RESULTS: No significant association between SHS exposure and depressive episodes/MDD could be observed (adjusted OR=1.01; 95%-CI=0.86, 1.15). Male never-smokers exposed to SHS were at a significantly lower likelihood of depression than unexposed men (AME= -0.009; 95%-CI= -0.018, -0.0001). No significant differences were observed for women (AME= 0.007; 95%-CI= -0.003, 0.017). LIMITATIONS: The association between SHS exposure and depression is prone to residual confounding. Furthermore, all information were cross-sectional and based on self-report. CONCLUSIONS: No association between SHS exposure and depression was observed in the combined sample. Among men, the association was counterintuitive. Never-smokers exposed to SHS are presumably more frequently involved in social interactions than those not exposed which may be protective for the development of depressive symptoms. Additional research accounting for residual confounding is necessary to allow further insights into the relationship between SHS exposure and depression.

Enabling and Predisposing Factors for the Utilization of Preventive Dental Health Care in Migrants and Non-Migrants in Germany.

BACKGROUND: In many European countries including Germany, migrants utilize preventive services less frequently than the majority population. This is also true for the utilization of dental checkups. Little is known about which demographic, social, behavioral, and health-related factors influence the decision of migrants to seek preventive dental health care and how these factors differ from those in non-migrants. The aim of the present study was to examine the role of these factors among migrants and non-migrants residing in Germany. METHODS: Data from cross-sectional national health surveys are used, providing information on preventive dental health behavior from n = 41,220 individuals, of which 15.0% are migrants. Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use is the conceptual framework of the investigation. Multiple logistic regression models were applied to examine the role of different predisposing and enabling factors. Interaction terms were included in order to examine whether determinants differ between migrants and non-migrants. Average marginal effects (AMEs) are reported in addition to odds ratios (ORs) as measures of effect size which are robust against bias arising from unobserved heterogeneity. RESULTS: Migrants are at an about 36% lower chance of utilizing regular dental checkups than non-migrants [OR = 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.68); AME = -0.081 (95% CI = -0.093, -0.069)]. Differences are partly explained by the influence of demographic, social, behavioral, and health-related factors [adjusted OR = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.73); AME = -0.065 (95% CI = -0.076, -0.053)]. Younger age, being male, lower socioeconomic status, a non-statutory health insurance, not living in a relationship, living in the Western part of Germany and in an urban setting, and poor limited social support were associated with a lower chance of utilizing regular dental checkups. Interaction effects could be observed for age and for the type of health insurance. DISCUSSION: The study identifies different enabling and predisposing factors that are relevant for the utilization of dental checkups among the population in Germany, some of which differ between migrants and non-migrants. Differences are particularly pronounced for younger ages. This differs from findings on other preventive services where older migrants tend to be more disadvantaged. Additional explanatory factors such as barriers that migrants experience in the dental health care system need to be considered in order to implement patient-oriented services and to reduce disparities in access to dental prevention.