Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Onkologie ; 29(4): 171-8, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16601374

RESUMO

The most common chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of breast cancer are anthracyclines and taxanes. The major dose-limiting toxicities associated with these agents are myelosuppression and associated febrile neutropenia (FN). FN can significantly impact the ability to deliver full-dose chemotherapy on schedule and as a result may increase the risk of disease recurrence and eventual disease-related mortality. The use of granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) significantly improves the management of FN, both in a therapeutic and in a prophylactic approach. Nevertheless, the high cost of these agents limits their widespread prophylactic use. Therefore, the identification of patients who are at a higher risk of developing FN and who will benefit from the prophylactic use of G-CSFs has become the subject of several clinical and cost-effectiveness studies. Recently, new data have been accumulated concerning the risk of FN in different chemotherapy regimens, and different risk models have been developed to assess the neutropenic risk with all its complications. This article reviews and summarizes cutting-edge, disease-specific data as well as national and international guidelines regarding the use of G-CSFs to prevent chemotherapy-induced FN, with focus on the treatment of breast cancer.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Febre/induzido quimicamente , Febre/prevenção & controle , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Neutropenia/prevenção & controle , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Onkologie ; 29(5): 210-7, 2006 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16679783

RESUMO

Even in elderly patients, greater consideration is now being given to tumor volume reduction in locally advanced breast cancer, with increased subsequent breast-conserving surgery. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy offers the possibility of testing therapeutic efficacy in vivo, which is of great importance for optimal adjuvant treatment. Resulting therapy modifications can be expected to increase disease-free as well as overall survival. Recent results indicate that remission rates with primary chemotherapy are significantly lower in receptor-positive than in receptor-negative breast cancer and that efficacy parameters in receptor-positive tumors tend to favor primary endocrine therapy, highlighting the increased importance of this type of treatment. Aromatase inhibitors are superior to tamoxifen in terms of clinical response as well as breast conservation rate. Results from a small number of studies suggest that prolonged preoperative aromatase inhibitor therapy for up to 12 months can increase the rate of clinical and pathological complete remissions. In conclusion, primary endocrine therapy is a valid therapeutic option for postmenopausal patients with locally advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and significant comorbidity, increased risk of complications with regard to anesthesia and surgery, desire for breast-conserving surgery and/or reduced suitability for chemotherapy, as well as in very old patients.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Pós-Menopausa , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Tamoxifeno/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Onkologie ; 28(8-9): 441-5, 2005 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16160408

RESUMO

We report about the 2-year results of a physician-based active cost management model for oncological therapies in a German OB/GYN university clinic. Over 2 years more than 4,000 oncological cycles were prospectively and individually analyzed regarding costs and reimbursement mode. Main aim was reducing costs without lowering cycle number and standard of care. Within two years pharmaceutical costs were reduced by 83.4% or 785,976-EUR. All causes for a previous financial loss were identified and eliminated. Debts were paid back and employment of new staff and investments were possible. With this first active cost management model by and for physicians, oncological therapies can be performed cost covering even in a university clinic. Although developed for optimization of cost coverage of oncological therapies in Germany, this model is universally transferable.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/economia , Papel do Médico , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Redução de Custos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Alemanha , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/economia , Estudos Prospectivos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA