Factors Associated with Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer remain unclear, but it is recommended for high-risk stage II disease. Which patients receive chemotherapy and its impact on survival remains undetermined. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was surveyed between 2004 and 2016 for stage II colon cancer patients. Patients were categorized as high- or average-risk as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. The demographic characteristics of high- and average-risk patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy were compared using univariate and multivariable analyses. The survival of high- and average-risk patients was compared based on receipt of chemotherapy with Cox hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Overall, 84,424 patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 34,868 patients were high-risk and 49,556 were average-risk. In high-risk patients, the risk factors for not receiving chemotherapy included increasing age, distance from the treatment facility, Charlson-Deyo score, and lack of insurance. In average-risk patients, factors associated with receipt of chemotherapy were decreasing age, distance from the treatment facility, Charlson-Deyo score, and non-academic association of the treatment facility. In both, chemotherapy was significantly associated with increased survival on the Kaplan-Meier curve. In the Cox hazard ratio, only high-risk patients benefited from chemotherapy (hazard ratio 1.183, confidence interval 1.116-1.254). CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with not receiving chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancers included increasing age, medical comorbidities, increasing distance from the treatment facility, and lack of insurance. Chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in high-risk patients.

Oxaloacetate activates brain mitochondrial biogenesis, enhances the insulin pathway, reduces inflammation and stimulates neurogenesis.

Brain bioenergetic function declines in some neurodegenerative diseases, this may influence other pathologies and administering bioenergetic intermediates could have therapeutic value. To test how one intermediate, oxaloacetate (OAA) affects brain bioenergetics, insulin signaling, inflammation and neurogenesis, we administered intraperitoneal OAA, 1-2 g/kg once per day for 1-2 weeks, to C57Bl/6 mice. OAA altered levels, distributions or post-translational modifications of mRNA and proteins (proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1α, PGC1 related co-activator, nuclear respiratory factor 1, transcription factor A of the mitochondria, cytochrome oxidase subunit 4 isoform 1, cAMP-response element binding, p38 MAPK and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase) in ways that should promote mitochondrial biogenesis. OAA increased Akt, mammalian target of rapamycin and P70S6K phosphorylation. OAA lowered nuclear factor κB nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratios and CCL11 mRNA. Hippocampal vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA, doublecortin mRNA, doublecortin protein, doublecortin-positive neuron counts and neurite length increased in OAA-treated mice. (1)H-MRS showed OAA increased brain lactate, GABA and glutathione thereby demonstrating metabolic changes are detectable in vivo. In mice, OAA promotes brain mitochondrial biogenesis, activates the insulin signaling pathway, reduces neuroinflammation and activates hippocampal neurogenesis.