RESUMO
Clostridioides difficile produces an environmentally resistant dormant spore morphotype that infected patients shed to the hospital environment. C. difficile spores persist in clinical reservoirs that are not targeted by hospital routine cleaning protocols. Transmissions and infections from these reservoirs present a hazard to patient safety. This study aimed to assess the impact of patients acutely suffering from C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) on C. difficile environmental contamination to identify potential reservoirs. Twenty-three hospital rooms accommodating CDAD inpatients with corresponding soiled workrooms of 14 different wards were studied in a German maximum-care hospital. Additionally, four rooms that never accommodated CDAD patients were examined as negative controls. Stagnant water and biofilms from sinks, toilets, and washer disinfector (WD) traps as well as swabs from cleaned bedpans and high-touch surfaces (HTSs) were sampled. For detection, a culture method was used with selective medium. A latex agglutination assay and a Tox A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were performed with suspect colonies. Stagnant water and biofilms in hospital traps (29%), WDs (34%), and HTSs (37%) were found to be reservoirs for large amounts of C. difficile during the stay of CDAD inpatients that decreased but could persist 13 ± 6 days after their discharge (13%, 14%, and 9.5%, respectively). Control rooms showed none or only slight contamination restricted to WDs. A short-term cleaning strategy was implemented that reduced C. difficile in stagnant water almost entirely. IMPORTANCE Wastewater pipes are microbial ecosystems. The potential risk of infection emanating from the wastewater for individuals is often neglected, since it is perceived to remain in the pipes. However, sewage systems start with siphons and are thus naturally connected to the outside world. Wastewater pathogens do not only flow unidirectionally to wastewater treatment plants but also retrogradely, e.g., through splashing water from siphons to the hospital environment. This study focused on the pathogen C. difficile, which can cause severe and sometimes fatal diarrheas. This study shows how patients suffering from such diarrheas contaminate the hospital environment with C. difficile and that contamination persists in siphon habitats after patient discharge. This might pose a health risk for hospitalized patients afterward. Since this pathogen's spore morphotype is very environmentally resistant and difficult to disinfect, we show a cleaning measure that can almost entirely eliminate C. difficile from siphons.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecção Hospitalar , Humanos , Clostridioides , Águas Residuárias , Ecossistema , Esporos Bacterianos , Hospitais , DiarreiaRESUMO
Antibiotics are essential for modern medicine, they are employed frequently in hospitals and, therefore, present in hospital wastewater. Even in concentrations, that are lower than the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of susceptible bacteria, antibiotics may exert an influence and select resistant bacteria, if they exceed the MSCs (minimal selective concentrations) of resistant strains. Here, we compare the MSCs of fluorescently labelled Acinetobacter baylyi strains harboring spontaneous resistance mutations or a resistance plasmid with antibiotic concentrations determined in hospital wastewater. Low MSCs in the µg/L range were measured for the quinolone ciprofloxacin (17 µg/L) and for the carbapenem meropenem (30 µg/L). A 24 h continuous analysis of hospital wastewater showed daily fluctuations of the concentrations of these antibiotics with distinctive peaks at 7-8 p.m. and 5-6 a.m. The meropenem concentrations were always above the MSC and MIC values of A. baylyi. In addition, the ciprofloxacin concentrations were in the range of the lowest MSC for about half the time. These results explain the abundance of strains with meropenem and ciprofloxacin resistance in hospital wastewater and drains.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Águas Residuárias , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Meropeném/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , HospitaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lead pipes have been used in drinking water installations for a long time. Only since 1973 have their use in new buildings been strongly discouraged; nevertheless, they are still found in old buildings. Furthermore, lead-containing alloys are still used today in components such as fittings. This results in an avoidable pollution of drinking water. The health significance of this pollution is acknowledged by a reduction of the currently valid limit value from 10⯵g/l to 5⯵g/l by the new EU drinking water directive passed in 2020. This directive provides for a transition period of 15 years. OBJECTIVES: The relevance of a stricter limit value for lead in drinking water will be evaluated based by the results of routine analyses, and the necessary public health measures to prevent exposure of vulnerable groups will be formulated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of routine samples from the city of Bonn, which an accredited drinking water laboratory had examined in the years 1997-2019, was performed. RESULTS: Of the 16,060 samples analyzed, 75.36% were below the quantitative limit of quantification. The median of the quantifiable samples was above the future limit for lead in drinking water in each year considered. No effect of the last transition period of 10 years (2003-2013) could be detected. DISCUSSION: Even though no systematic studies on lead pollution in German municipalities are available, the subject is still highly topical. Lead exposure from drinking water installations is a completely avoidable health risk, but it can only be regulated by consistent enforcement of the applicable rules by the health authorities. The health authorities must be adequately equipped in terms of personnel, material, and financial resources.
Assuntos
Água Potável , Poluentes Químicos da Água , Cidades , Alemanha , Estudos Retrospectivos , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Abastecimento de ÁguaRESUMO
During the period from April 2012 to May 2013, 13 newborns (1 to 4 weeks of age) and 1 child in a pediatric hospital ward in Germany were colonized with Klebsiella oxytoca producing an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) (CTX-M-15). A microbiological source-tracking analysis with human and environmental samples was carried out to identify the source and transmission pathways of the K. oxytoca clone. In addition, different hygienic intervention methods were evaluated. K. oxytoca isolates were detected in the detergent drawer and on the rubber door seal of a domestic washer-extractor machine that was used in the same ward to wash laundry for the newborns, as well as in two sinks. These strains were typed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing. The environmental findings were compared with those for the human strains and the isolates detected on clothing. The results from both techniques showed that the strains were identical (sequence type 201 and PFGE type 00531, a clone specific to this hospital and not previously isolated in Germany), emphasizing the washing machine as a reservoir and fomite for the transmission of these multidrug-resistant bacteria. After the washing machine was taken out of use, no further colonizations were detected during the subsequent 4-year period.IMPORTANCE Washing machines should be further investigated as possible sites for horizontal gene transfer (ESBL genes) and cross-contamination with clinically important Gram-negative strains. Particularly in the health care sector, the knowledge of possible (re-)contamination of laundry (patients' clothes and staff uniforms) with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria could help to prevent and to control nosocomial infections. This report describes an outbreak with a single strain of a multidrug-resistant bacterium (Klebsiella oxytoca sequence type 201) in a neonatal intensive care unit that was terminated only when the washing machine was removed. In addition, the study implies that changes in washing machine design and processing are required to prevent accumulation of residual water where microbial growth can occur and contaminate clothes.
Assuntos
Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Fômites/microbiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/transmissão , Serviço Hospitalar de Lavanderia , Borracha , Microbiologia da Água , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Microbiologia Ambiental , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Alemanha , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Infecções por Klebsiella/prevenção & controle , Klebsiella oxytoca/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella oxytoca/enzimologia , Klebsiella oxytoca/isolamento & purificação , Tipagem de Sequências Multilocus , beta-LactamasesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: To combat multi-resistant gram-negative bacteria as the cause of life-threatening infections, antibiotic stewardship activities are of great importance. OBJECTIVE: To detect weaknesses when prescribing antibiotics in hospitals and compare the situation between 2009 and 2014. METHODS: In 2014, a questionnaire was sent to all 380 physicians employed in 7 hospitals. Primary, secondary and tertiary care hospitals were included. Investigated were: demographic data, position, certified specialization, presence of antibiotic prescription rules and behavior to follow them. 119 completed questionnaires of 2014 were compared to 3 613 obtained in 2009. RESULTS: 31% of the questionnaires were returned. 53.8% were interns. Half of these had a certified specialization. 32.8% were consultants and 12.6% were chief physicians. 22.6% were internists, 18.4% surgeons, 10.9% urologists and 9.2% anesthetists. The majority prescribed antibiotics on a daily routine, among the interns 66%. 23% of interns reported they would advise colleagues daily and 61% at least once a week. The most common indications for antibiotic use were antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery (35), urinary tract infection (32) and pneumonia (29). Standard duration of antibiotic therapy reported were 7 days for pneumonia, 5 days for urinary tract infections and 1 day for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery, while almost 50% of surgeons widened the antibiotic prophylaxis to 3, 5, 7,8 and 10 days. 93.3% physicians reported the use of therapeutic guidelines either from their own hospital or from medical societies. Only 59.3% were provided with the antimicrobial resistance data of their hospital. 52.1% would not ask a consultant for advice before prescribing a broadband antibiotic. Compared to 2009, lack of knowledge about antimicrobial resistance, use of guidelines, and advice from a consultant improved about 5%-points each. CONCLUSION: Despite improvement compared to 2009, 38.9% of all physicians asked did not know their regional antibiotic resistant data and half of all surgeons still used surgical prophylaxis longer than 24 h. As the compliance to use guidelines is high with 93.3%, maintenance and development of antibiotic guidelines adjusted to the resistance data is of the greatest importance. Furthermore, antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery longer than 1 day adds to the risks of antibiotics without giving more benefit and must be critically analyzed.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Alemanha , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
This article reports the remarkable course of a facial ulcer in a patient receiving prednisolone for Crohn's disease. Based on the initially unclear origin of the ulcer the patient received a triple anti-infective treatment (antiviral, antibiotic, antimycotic) but the lesion showed a rapid progression. An orthopoxvirus infection could be verified later by extensive diagnostics and relevant differential diagnoses could be ruled out. Extensive necrotic changes were observed in the first weeks resulting in cicatricial healing after months. Human cowpox infections have been repeatedly reported in Germany and are a relevant zoonosis. Cats and rodents are main carriers. The differential diagnoses include infections caused by other bacterial, mycobacterial, mycotic and parasitic agents that are thoroughly discussed here both clinically and histopathologically. Especially cutaneous leishmaniasis must be named as the incidence is continuously rising. With inadequate treatment infectious facial ulcers may give rise to life-threatening complications and extensive disfiguring scarring, therefore treatment must be initiated in a timely manner.
Assuntos
Orthopoxvirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Poxviridae/diagnóstico , Úlcera/etiologia , Animais , Gatos/virologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Face/patologia , Alemanha , Humanos , Necrose , Infecções por Poxviridae/virologia , ZoonosesRESUMO
According to the amendment of the Infection Protection Act (2011), § 23, 8, all federal states in Germany had to pass their own hospital hygiene regulations, in which the need for hygiene specialists in a hospital is defined.This publication explains in its first part the differences between the nationwide Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) regulations and the hygiene regulations of the different federal states (Hesse, Bavaria, etc.). All federal states - with the exception of Hesse (Hessian Hygiene Regulation, HHygVO) - refer to the relevant expert recommendations of KRINKO.In a second part of this publication, we highlight differences between KRINKO and HHygVO with the example of hospitals in the city of Frankfurt. In 2017, all Frankfurt hospitals had the necessary hygiene specialists (authorized hygiene practitioners, infection control nurses, authorized hygiene care nurses). However, the need for hospital hygienists could not be met, because there is an insufficient number of physician specialists for hospital hygiene available in Germany.The hospitals cannot solve this problem on their own - a political, superordinate decision and regulation must be made, i.â¯e. by regulation and financial support for the advanced training of post-graduate physicians in hygiene. This is important since only experienced hospital hygienists can instruct or supervise hygiene specialists-in-training.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Higiene , Médicos , Alemanha , Política de Saúde , Hospitais , HumanosRESUMO
Five beige-pigmented, oxidase-negative bacterial isolates, 6331-17T, 6332-17, 6333-17, 6334-17 and 9827-07, isolated either from a drinking water storage reservoir or drinking water in 2006 and 2017 in Germany, were examined in detail applying by a polyphasic taxonomic approach. Cells of the isolates were rod-shaped and Gram-stain-negative. Comparison of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of these five isolates showed highest sequence similarities to Lelliottia amnigena (99.98â%) and Lelliottia nimipressuralis (99.99â%). Multilocus sequence analyses based on concatenated partial rpoB, gyrB, infB and atpD sequences confirmed the clustering of these isolates with Lelliottia species, but also revealed a clear distinction to the closest related type strains. Analysis of the genome sequences of these isolates indicated >70â% in silico DNA-DNA hybridization and high average nucleotide identities between strains. Nevertheless, they showed only <70 and <95â% similarity to the type strains of these two Lelliottia species. The fatty acid profiles of these isolates were very similar and consisted of the major fatty acids C16:0, C17â:â0cyclo, C15â:â0iso 2-OH/C16â:â1ω7c and C18â:â1ω7c. In addition, physiological/biochemical tests revealed high phenotypic similarity to each other. These cumulative data indicate that these isolates represent a novel Lelliottia species, for which the name Lelliottia aquatilis sp. nov. is proposed, with strain 6331-17T (=CCM 8846T=CIP 111609T=LMG 30560T) as the type strain.
Assuntos
Água Potável/microbiologia , Enterobacteriaceae/classificação , Filogenia , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Composição de Bases , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Ácidos Graxos/química , Genes Bacterianos , Alemanha , Tipagem de Sequências Multilocus , Hibridização de Ácido Nucleico , Pigmentação , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNARESUMO
Colonization of livestock with bacteria resistant to antibiotics is considered a risk for the entry of drug-resistant pathogens into the food chain. For this reason, there is a need for novel concepts to address the eradication of drug-resistant commensals on farms. In the present report, we evaluated the decontamination measures taken on a farm contaminated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Enterobacteriaceae expressing extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL-E). The decontamination process preceded the conversion from piglet breeding to gilt production. Microbiological surveillance showed that the decontamination measures eliminated the MRSA and ESBL-E strains that were detected on the farm before the complete removal of pigs, cleaning and disinfection of the stable, and construction of an additional stable meeting high-quality standards. After pig production was restarted, ESBL-E remained undetectable over 12 months, but MRSA was recovered from pigs and the environment within the first 2 days. However, spa (Staphylococcus aureus protein A gene) typing revealed acquisition of an MRSA strain (type t034) that had not been detected before decontamination. Interestingly, we observed that a farmworker who had been colonized with the prior MRSA strain (t2011) acquired the new strain (t034) after 2 months. In summary, this report demonstrates that decontamination protocols similar to those used here can lead to successful elimination of contaminating MRSA and ESBL-E in pigs and the stable environment. Nevertheless, decontamination protocols do not prevent the acquisition of new MRSA strains.
Assuntos
Animais Domésticos , Desinfecção/métodos , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/veterinária , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/veterinária , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Agricultura , Animais , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Portador Sadio/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , SuínosRESUMO
In this study, the performance of a new most probable number (MPN) test (Pseudalert(®)/Quanti-Tray(®)) for the enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from hospital waters was compared with both international and national membrane filtration-based culture methods for P. aeruginosa: ISO 16266:2006 and UK The Microbiology of Drinking Water - Part 8 (MoDW Part 8), which both use Pseudomonas CN agar. The comparison based on the calculation of mean relative differences between the two methods was conducted according to ISO 17994:2014. Using both routine hospital water samples (80 from six laboratories) and artificially contaminated samples (192 from five laboratories), paired counts from each sample and the enumeration method were analysed. For routine samples, there were insufficient data for a conclusive assessment, but the data do indicate at least equivalent performance of Pseudalert(®)/Quanti-Tray(®). For the artificially contaminated samples, the data revealed higher counts of P. aeruginosa being recorded by Pseudalert(®)/Quanti-Tray(®). The Pseudalert(®)/Quanti-Tray(®) method does not require confirmation testing for atypical strains of P. aeruginosa, saving up to 6 days of additional analysis, and has the added advantage of providing confirmed counts within 24-28 hours incubation compared to 40-48 hours or longer for the ISO 16266 and MoDW Part 8 methods.
Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Hospitais , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Microbiologia da Água , Humanos , Pseudomonas fluorescens/isolamento & purificação , Especificidade da EspécieRESUMO
Between 1 August and 6 September 2013, an outbreak of Legionnaires' disease (LD) with 159 suspected cases occurred in Warstein, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. The outbreak consisted of 78 laboratory-confirmed cases of LD, including one fatality, with a case fatality rate of 1%. Legionella pneumophila, serogroup 1, subtype Knoxville, sequence type 345, was identified as the epidemic strain. A case-control study was conducted to identify possible sources of infection. In univariable analysis, cases were almost five times more likely to smoke than controls (odds ratio (OR): 4.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.33-9.93; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, cases were twice as likely to live within a 3 km distance from one identified infection source as controls (OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.09-4.20; p < 0.027). This is the largest outbreak of LD in Germany to date. Due to a series of uncommon events, this outbreak was most likely caused by multiple sources involving industrial cooling towers. Quick epidemiological assessment, source tracing and shutting down of potential sources as well as rapid laboratory testing and early treatment are necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality. Maintenance of cooling towers must be carried out according to specification to prevent similar LD outbreaks in the future.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Doença dos Legionários/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ar Condicionado , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Exposição Ambiental/análise , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Legionella pneumophila/classificação , Legionella pneumophila/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Fatores de Risco , Sorotipagem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Microbiologia da Água , Abastecimento de Água , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Introduction: Since 2007, the classification of ethanol under the Biocidal Products Regulation has paradoxically remained unresolved due to conflicting views among experts and authorities. Initially, there was a discussion about classifying ethanol as carcinogenic. The current proposal to extend its harmonized classification includes, among other things, categorizing it as reproductive toxicity category 2 ("suspected to have CMR potential for humans"; carcinogenic, mutagenic, reprotoxic). If ethanol were classified under reproductive toxicity category 2, it would mean that the only active ingredient in hand antiseptics effective against non-enveloped viruses would no longer be available. Scientific assessment of the safety of ethanol-based hand rubs EBHR: Available epidemiological studies do not confirm an increased risk for cancer from EBHR in exposed individuals, except under uncommon or unlikely routes or levels of exposure.The evidence for ethanol's reprotoxic effect originates from the consumption of alcoholic beverages by pregnant women, where ethanol uptake is incomparably higher. The amount of transdermal ethanol absorption during hand antisepsis is up to ten times lower than the oral intake of beverages containing hidden ethanol, such as apple juice, kefir, or non-alcoholic beer. Blood alcohol levels after using EBHR remain within the physiological range associated with food intake. Conclusion: There is no epidemiological evidence of toxicity for workers handling ethanol-containing products in industry or using EBHR in healthcare settings. Given that the classification of EBHR as reproductive toxicity category 2 is not supported by current scientific research and that no alternative biocidal active substance in hand rubs is effective against non-enveloped viruses, medical associations and expert committees from Europe, the USA, Canada, the Asia-Pacific region, and the World Society for Virology unequivocally recommend, with the highest priority, that EBHR be approved as an active substance for PT1 biocides and not be classified as a reproductive toxicant in category 2.
RESUMO
Aims: To evaluate a newly developed microscale quantitative suspension test compared to the existing standard suspension test using determination of the bactericidal and yeasticidal activity of glutaral as one step to improve the sustainability of disinfectant testing. Methods: The testing principles of the quantitative suspension test according to VAH method 9 (comparable to EN 13727) was used as a standard suspension test using 8.0 mL product test solution, 1.0 mL organic load and 1.0 mL test suspension. In addition, a micro-scale suspension test was performed in 96-well plates with 160 µL product test solution, 20 µL organic load and 20 µL test suspension. S. aureus ATCC 6538, P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442 and C. albicans ATCC 10231 were test organisms. Glutaral was tested at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% with exposure times of 1, 5 and 15 min. Polysorbate 80 (30 g/L), lecithin (9 g/L), L-histidine (1 g/L) and glycine (10 g/L) were used as validated neutralizers. After serial dilution of the disinfectant-neutralizer-mixture, plates were incubated for 48 h at 36°C (bacteria) or 72 hours at 30°C (C. albicans) and colony forming units (cfu) counted. The lg reduction was calculated as the difference between the results of the water control and the disinfectant at the end of the exposure time. All experiments were done in triplicate under clean conditions. Means of lg reduction were compared with the unpaired t-test, p<0.05 was considered to be significant. Results: Sufficient bactericidal activity according the VAH test requirements of at least 5 lg was found with both methods in 16 data sets of 24 data sets in total, and insufficient bactericidal activity of less than 5 lg was found with both methods in 7 data sets. In one data set, the mean lg reduction was above 5 lg with the microscale method and <5 lg with the VAH method, with no significant difference between the data sets (p=0.3096; 0.2% glutaral, 1 min, P. aeruginosa). A sufficient yeasticidal activity of at least 4 lg was found with both methods in one data set, an insufficient yeasticidal activity of less than 4 lg was found with both methods in 8 data sets. With one exception, no significant differences were detected between the two methods below the efficacy threshold. Conclusions: The microscale quantitative suspension test proved to provide results similar to those of VAH method 9 when the bactericidal and yeasticidal activity of glutaralwas evaluated, with 32 out of 33 evaluations yielding consistent results in terms of efficacy. Its suitability should be confirmed with additional bacterial species, additional biocidal active substances and in other laboratories.
RESUMO
This position paper, developed by an interdisciplinary expert group of neonatologists, paediatric infectious disease physicians, clinical pharmacists and specialists for the prevention and control of nosocomial infections, describes the "Good handling practice of medicines parenterally administered to patients on NICUs". It takes equal account of patient safety and the specialties of neonatal intensive care regarding feasibility and proportionality. The overall concept is perceived as a "learning system", in which open communication within the health-care team relating to medication errors and critical incidents enables continuous development and improvement to ensure patient safety. In our opinion, pharmacists, who are responsible for the supply of ready-to-administer parenteral medicinal products for neonatal intensive care patients, as well as the hygiene staff responsible on site are integral parts of the interdisciplinary treatment team. Risks of the current clinical practice of parenteral treatment of NICU patients are discussed in detail and recommendations for safety-relevant procedures are given.
RESUMO
In the summer of 2010, parenteral nutrition (PN) admixtures were administered to neonates in the Pediatric Department of the University Medical Center Mainz that provoked severe clinical sequelae. Contamination of a dummy infusion with Enterobacter cloacae and Escherichia hermannii was detected on the day of the incident, and the same isolates were subsequently grown from all PN admixtures as well as from the parent amino acid solution from which the admixtures had been prepared. Quantitative microbiological analyses paired with the determination of endotoxin concentrations enabled the conclusion to be reached that the amino acid solution had represented the primary source of contamination, which must have occurred in the distant past and may have derived from passage of the bacteria through a crack in the glass container. The findings have large implications, and the approaches employed should become of value when similar incidents occur again in the future.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Contaminação de Medicamentos , Enterobacter cloacae/isolamento & purificação , Escherichia/isolamento & purificação , Soluções de Nutrição Parenteral , Sepse/microbiologia , Carga Bacteriana , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Endotoxinas/análise , Alemanha , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Sepse/etiologiaRESUMO
In Germany, recommendations on infection prevention and control of current virus outbreaks are given as communications by the Association for Applied Hygiene e.V. (VAH) together with the joint Disinfectant Commission of the German Association for the Control of Virus Diseases e.V. (DVV) and the Society of Virology* (GfV). The DVV was founded in 1954 in response to the ongoing threat to the population from polio and was given its current name in 1977. The DVV is supported by the Federal Ministry of Health, the Ministries of Health of the Federal States, scientific societies, as well as social foundations and organisations. Private individuals cannot be members of the DVV. The Society of Virology e.V. (GfV) is a scientific society for all virological fields in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, and is thus the largest virological society in Europe. With numerous commissions, guidelines and statements, it is the authoritative contact for research, healthcare and politics. The joint commission "Virus Disinfection" of these scientific societies focuses on the efficacy of chemical disinfection procedures against viruses. The VAH bundles the expertise of scientific societies and experts on infection prevention and is particularly committed to the quality assurance of hygiene measures. With the VAH disinfectant list, the association provides the standard reference for the selection of high-quality disinfection procedures. This disinfectant list has a tradition of more than 60 years in Germany. The original German version of this document was published in August 2022 and has now been made available to the international professional public in English. The document contains recommendations on hygiene and disinfection measures for monkeypox virus infections. Disinfectants against monkeypox must have at least proven efficacy against enveloped viruses (active against enveloped viruses); products with the efficacy ranges "limited virucidal activity" and "virucidal" can also be used. The disinfectant list of the VAH or the disinfectant list of the Robert Koch Institute are available for the selection of products. Especially in the case of contamination with crust or scab material, it should be noted that protein contamination can have a protective or stabilising effect on monkeypox. Therefore, cleaning - before disinfection - should always be carried out in this situation. Preventive measures such as vaccination and hygiene in the vicinity of people with monkeypox must be taken to prevent transmission to small children, pregnant women or people with a pronounced immune deficiency.
RESUMO
The German Society of Hospital Hygiene develops guidelines, recommendations and standard operation procedures on a voluntary basis, published on the DGKH-website (https://www.krankenhaushygiene.de/). The original German version of this recommendation was published in April 2022 and has now been made available to the international professional public in English. Evaluating the current data on the efficacy of virucidal gargle/mouthwash solutions and nasal sprays against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and in clinical trials, conducted with preventive or therapeutic objectives, recommendations are given for the prevention of COVID-19. The following areas are considered: Protection of the community when regional clusters or high incidences of infection become knownProtection of the community at low risk of infectionPre-exposure prophylaxis for the protection of healthcare workersPost-exposure prophylaxis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The approval of ethanol by the Biocidal Products Regulation has been under evaluation since 2007. This follows concern over alcohol uptake from ethanol-based hand rubs (EBHR). If ethanol is classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic, or reprotoxic by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), then this would affect infection prevention and control practices. AIM: A review was performed to prove that ethanol is toxicological uncritical and indispensable for hand antisepsis because of its unique activity against non-enveloped viruses and thus the resulting lack of alternatives. Therefore, the following main points are analyzed: The effectiveness of ethanol in hand hygiene, the evidence of ethanol at blood/tissue levels through hand hygiene in healthcare, and the evidence of toxicity of different blood/tissue ethanol levels and the non-comparability with alcoholic consumption and industrial exposure. RESULTS: EBHR are essential for preventing infections caused by non-enveloped viruses, especially in healthcare, nursing homes, food industry and other areas. Propanols are effective against enveloped viruses as opposed to non-enveloped viruses but there are no other alternatives for virucidal hand antisepsis. Long-term ingestion of ethanol in the form of alcoholic beverages can cause tumours. However, lifetime exposure to ethanol from occupational exposure < 500 ppm does not significantly contribute to the cancer risk. Mutagenic effects were observed only at doses within the toxic range in animal studies. While reprotoxicity is linked with abuse of alcoholic beverages, there is no epidemiological evidence for this from EBHR use in healthcare facilities or from products containing ethanol in non-healthcare settings. CONCLUSION: The body of evidence shows EBHRs have strong efficacy in killing non-enveloped viruses, whereas 1-propanol and 2-propanol do not kill non-enveloped viruses, that pose significant risk of infection. Ethanol absorbed through the skin during hand hygiene is similar to consumption of beverages with hidden ethanol content (< 0.5% v/v), such as apple juice or kefir. There is no risk of carcinogenicity, mutagenicity or reprotoxicity from repeated use of EBHR. Hence, the WHO Task Force strongly recommend retaining ethanol as an essential constituent in hand rubs for healthcare.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais , Higiene das Mãos , 2-Propanol , Animais , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/farmacologia , Antissepsia , Berlim , Etanol/farmacologia , Alemanha , Desinfecção das Mãos/métodos , Hospitais , Segurança do Paciente , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
Infections with antibiotic resistant pathogens threaten lives and cause substantial costs. For effective interventions, knowledge of the transmission paths of resistant bacteria to humans is essential. In this study, carbapenem resistant bacteria were isolated from the wastewater of a maximum care hospital during a period of two years, starting in the patient rooms and following the sewer system to the effluent of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). The bacteria belonged to six different species and 44 different sequence types (STs). The most frequent STs, ST147 K. pneumoniae (blaNDM/blaOXA-48) and ST235 P. aeruginosa (blaVIM) strains, were present at nearly all sampling sites from the hospital to the WWTP effluent. After core genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST), all ST147 K. pneumoniae strains presented a single epidemiological cluster. In contrast, ST235 P. aeruginosa formed five cgMLST clusters and the largest cluster contained the strain from the WWTP effluent, indicating without doubt, a direct dissemination of both high-risk clones into the environment. Thus, there are - at least two - possible transmission pathways to humans, (i) within the hospital by contact with the drains of the sanitary installations and (ii) by recreational or irrigation use of surface waters that have received WWTP effluent. In conclusion, remediation measures must be installed at both ends of the wastewater system, targeting the drains of the hospital as well as at the effluent of the WWTP.