An update on clinical trials for cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) comprises dermatologic manifestations that may occur independently or with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite advancements in refining CLE classification, establishing precise subtype criteria remains challenging due to overlapping presentations and difficulty in distinguishing morphology. Current treatments encompass preventive measures, topical therapies, and systemic approaches. Hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids are the sole US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for CLE, with numerous off-label treatments available. However, these treatments are often not covered by insurance, imposing a significant financial burden on patients. The exclusion of most CLE patients, particularly those without concurrent SLE, from trials designed for SLE has resulted in a lack of targeted treatments for CLE. To develop effective CLE treatments, validated outcome measures for tracking patient responsiveness are essential. The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index is widely utilized for its reliability, validity, and ability to differentiate between skin activity and damage. In contrast, the FDA mandates the use of the Investigator's Global Assessment, a five-point Likert scale related to lesion characteristics, for skin-related therapeutic trials. It requires the disease to resolve or almost completely resolve to demonstrate improvement, which can be difficult when there is residual erythema or incomplete clearance that is meaningfully improved from a patient perspective. Various classes of skin lupus medications target diverse pathways, allowing tailored treatment based on the patient's lupus inflammatory profile, resulting in improved outcomes. Promising targeted therapeutic drugs include anifrolumab (anti-type 1 interferon), deucravacitinib (allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor), litifilimab (plasmacytoid dendritic cell-directed therapy), iberdomide (cereblon-targeting ligand), and belimumab (B-cell directed therapy). Despite the significant impact of CLE on quality of life, therapeutic options remain inadequate. While promising treatments for cutaneous lupus are emerging, it is crucial to underscore the urgency for skin-focused treatment outcomes and the implementation of validated measures to assess therapeutic effectiveness in clinical trials.

Area Deprivation and Disease Severity in Adult Patients With Discoid Lupus Erythematosus.

Importance: The association of area deprivation with outcomes in discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) remains poorly understood. Objective: To determine the association between US Census block measures of deprivation and disease severity in adult patients with DLE. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included 154 patients with DLE seen between January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2024, at a single-center referral-based specialty rheumatologic-dermatology clinic in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Patients were aged 18 to 73 years and were enrolled in the University of Pennsylvania's Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Database study. Data were analyzed between January 1, 2024, and May 8, 2024. Exposures: Residence in a highly disadvantaged area as geocoded by a state area deprivation index (ADI). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was DLE disease severity as codified by the validated Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) damage and activity scores. Results: A total of 154 adult patients with DLE (128 women [83%] and 26 men [17%]; mean [SD] age, 43 [13] years; 6 [4%] Asian individuals, 98 [64%] Black individuals, 2 [1%] Hispanic individuals, 46 [30%] White individuals, and 2 individuals [1%] with other race or ethnicity; 78 [51%] with an ADI >5; 43 who currently smoked [28%];and 56 [36%] with concurrent systemic lupus erythematosus) were included in the analysis. By multivariable logistic regression, residence within communities with an ADI greater than 5 was associated with nearly 4-fold greater odds of moderate to severe damage (odds ratio [OR], 3.90; 95% CI, 1.27-12.69] and activity (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.27-9.44). Concurrent cigarette smoking was similarly associated with greater odds of moderate to severe damage (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.09-10.29). After controlling for ADI and other confounders, race was not significantly associated with DLE disease severity. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that geospatial disadvantage is associated with DLE disease severity independent of race. This invites a paradigm shift that considers the social context within which racial disparities are observed, highlighting the potential for geographically targeted interventions and policy changes to improve patient outcomes in DLE.

Application of Risk-Based Cancer Screening in Patients With Dermatomyositis.

This cohort study investigates the performance of the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group cancer screening recommendations in a community setting.