BCL6-SPECC1L: A Novel Fusion Gene in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPCs) are malignant tumors originating from the lining epithelium of the nasopharynx. Fusion genes have been confirmed to play important roles in the occurrence and development of various malignant tumors, but the role of fusion genes in NPC is poorly understood. We aimed to explore new fusion genes that promote the occurrence and development of NPC. Methods: RNA-seq was used to search for interchromosomal translocations in 18 NPC tissues. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing were applied to verify the presence of BCL6-SPECC1L (BS); quantitative PCR (qPCR) and Western blotting were used to measure the expression level of BCL-6 in NPC cells; MTT and in vivo tumorigenesis assays were applied to evaluate the cell proliferation ability; immunofluorescence assays were used to determine the cellular localization of BCL6 and BS; and a luciferase reporter assay was performed to evaluate the ability of BCL6 and BS to inhibit transcription. Results: BS was present in 5.34% (11/206) of primary NPC biopsies and 2.13% (1/47) of head and neck cancer biopsies. The expression of BCL6 was downregulated in NPC, and silencing of endogenous BCL6 promoted NPC cell proliferation in vitro. Overexpression of BCL6 but not BS inhibited the growth of NPC cells in vivo and in vitro. Mechanistically, BCL6 localized in the nucleus can inhibit the G1/S transition to suppress the growth of NPC cells. However, after the fusion of BCL6 and SPECC1L, the product cannot localize to the nucleus, and the transcriptional inhibitory function of BCL6 is abolished, eventually abolishing its tumor suppressor effect and leading to the development of NPC. Conclusion: BS is a novel fusion gene in NPC that may play an important role in the occurrence and development of this cancer. The clinical significance of the BS fusion gene needs further elucidation.

Autocrine INSL5 promotes tumor progression and glycolysis via activation of STAT5 signaling.

Metabolic reprogramming plays important roles in development and progression of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the underlying mechanism has not been completely defined. In this work, we found INSL5 was elevated in NPC tumor tissue and the plasma of NPC patients. Plasma INSL5 could serve as a novel diagnostic marker for NPC, especially for serum VCA-IgA-negative patients. Moreover, higher plasma INSL5 level was associated with poor disease outcome. Functionally, INSL5 overexpression increased, whereas knockdown of its receptor GPCR142 or inhibition of INSL5 reduced cell proliferation, colony formation, and cell invasion in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo. Mechanistically, INSL5 enhanced phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of STAT5 and promoted glycolytic gene expression, leading to induced glycolysis in cancer cells. Pharmaceutical inhibition of glycolysis by 2-DG or blockade of INSL5 by a neutralizing antibody reversed INSL5-induced proliferation and invasion, indicating that INSL5 can be a potential therapeutic target in NPC. In conclusion, INSL5 enhances NPC progression by regulating cancer cell metabolic reprogramming and is a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker as well as a therapeutic target for NPC.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic value of pre-retreatment plasma epstein-barr virus DNA in locoregional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To define the clinical characteristics and prognostic value of pre-retreatment plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA, we investigated EBV status in locoregional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (lrNPC) patients. METHODS: Between April 2008 and August 2016, the data of patients with nonmetastatic lrNPC were retrospectively reviewed. The survival indexes of patients between different pre-retreatment EBV status groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 401 patients with nonmetastatic lrNPC were enrolled, and 197 (49.1%) patients had detectable pre-retreatment plasma EBV DNA. Treatment included radiotherapy alone (n = 37 patients), surgery alone (n = 105), radiotherapy (n = 208), surgery combined with radiotherapy (n = 20), chemotherapy and targeted therapy (n = 31). Median follow-up was 32 months. The 3-year locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) rates for the entire cohort were 64.8%, 89.4%, and 58.8%, respectively. The estimated 3-year LRRFS, DMFS, and OS rates for the pre EBV-positive group vs the pre EBV-negative group were 54.2% vs 75.0% (P < 0.001), 86.6% vs 91.9% (P = 0.05), 51.6% vs 65.9% (P = 0.01), respectively. Among patients in the clinical stage rI/II, there were 17 patients in the radiotherapy alone group and 49 patients in the surgery alone group. And there was no significant difference in overall survival between radiotherapy and surgery, even among the different pre-EBV statuses (P > 0.05). In terms of long-term toxic and side effects, the incidence of radioactive temporal lobe injury in the radiotherapy group was higher than that in the surgery group (35.3% vs 8.2%, P < 0.001), and no statistically significant difference was found in other long-term toxic and side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The positive rate of pre-retreatment plasma EBV DNA in lrNPC is lower than primary NPC. The prognosis of EBV DNA negative group is better than positive group. For locally early-stage lrNPC, regardless of EBV DNA status, radiotherapy and surgery are available options and both can achieve better long-term survival.