Obstetrical outcomes in women with history of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Potential risk of adverse obstetrical outcomes has been shown among breast cancer survivors. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between history of breast cancer (BC) and obstetrical outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline were searched from the inception of each database to April 2019. Selection criteria included prospective and retrospective cohort studies of BC pregnant survivors. The meta-analysis was performed by computing odds ratios (ORs) using both fixed and random-effects models. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the review was registered with PROSPERO number CRD42019127716. RESULTS: Four studies, including 1466 cases of BC survivors and 6,912,485 controls, were included. Compared with controls, a higher incidence of obstetrical complication was found in women with history of BC. The incidence of preterm birth (PTB) in the study group was 11.05% compared with 7.79% in the control group (1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.43-1.99). Breast cancer history was also associated with low birth weight (LBW) (study group: 9.26% vs. control group: 5.54%, 1.88, CI 95% 1.55-2.27), cesarean section (CS) (study group: 19.76% vs. control group 10.81%, 1.78, CI 95% 1.39-2.27), intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) (study group: 0.004% vs. control group 0.36%, of 1.25 CI 95% 0.36-4.35), and fetal anomalies (study group: 5.8% vs. control group: 4.26%, 1.45 CI 95% 1.01-2.09). CONCLUSIONS: History of BC was associated with adverse obstetrical outcomes.

The role of ultrasonographic adipose tissue thickness measurement in the first trimester in predicting gestational diabetes: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective observational study aimed to assess the association between maternal abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat thickness measured with ultrasound scan during the first trimester and the risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: We recruited 43 non-diabetic women with singleton pregnancy between 11 and 14 week of gestation and evaluated ultrasonographic measurements of subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) and preperitoneal fat (PF) above the umbilicus. During the 2nd trimester, GDM screening was performed by 75 g two-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and diagnosis was made when one or more plasma glucose values meets or exceeds the values indicated by International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG). RESULTS: Among the 43 woman, 8 developed GDM (18.6%). Of these 37,5% (N.=3) had been diagnosed with GDM during a previous pregnancy, with a statistically significant correlation (P=0.035). Mean SFT for all patients was significantly higher in the GDM group compared to non-GDM group (27.30±8.78 mm vs. 18.56±9.99 mm; P=0.049). Mean PF for all women showed a statistically significant correlation with GDM (13.27±9.07 mm for non GDM group vs. 23.52±10.24 mm for GDM group; P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal adiposity, both subcutaneous and visceral, seem to be a suitable predictor of GDM in early pregnancy and it can be easily assessed during a first trimester routine ultrasound, although further studies are needed to evaluate their role in the screening protocols.

Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: PAS is one of the most dangerous conditions associated with pregnancy and remains undiagnosed before delivery in from half to two-thirds of cases. Correct prenatal diagnosis is essential to reduce the burden of maternal and fetal morbidity. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of US and MRI in the diagnosis of PAS. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective study, 104 patients with suspected placenta accreta were enrolled and had been investigated with US and MRI. They were divided into four groups: no PAS, accreta, increta, and percreta. RESULTS: Compared to MRI, US results were higher in the diagnosis and in the identification of PAS severity (85% US vs. 80% MRI). For both methods, in the case of posterior placenta, there is greater difficulty in identifying the presence/absence of the disease (67% in both methods) and the severity level (61% US vs. 55% MRI). CONCLUSION: US, properly implemented with the application of defined and standardized scores, can be superior to MRI and absolutely sufficient for the diagnosis of PAS, limiting the use of MRI to a few doubtful cases and to cases in which surgical planning is necessary.

Non-compaction cardiomyopathy in pregnancy: a case report of spongy myocardium in both mother and foetus and systematic review of literature.

PURPOSE: Cardiovascular disease is the main nonobstetric cause of maternal death during pregnancy and is present in 0.5-4% of pregnancies in the western world. While hypertensive disorders remain the most frequent events, occurring in 6-8% of all pregnancies, cardiomyopathies are rare but encompass high complication rates. The aim of this systematic review is to report all data available up to date regarding pregnancies in patients with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) cardiomyopathy. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, Scopus and Embase were searched, up to January 2019, using combinations of these terms: left ventricular noncompaction, hypertrabeculation cardiomyopathy, spongy myocardium, spongiform cardiomyopathy and delivery, gestation, pregnancy, cesarean section (CS). After careful selection, 22 articles, reporting a total of 30 cases, including our own were included in the review. RESULTS: Fifteen out of 26 women (58%) were diagnosed with LVNC before pregnancy. Around 56% of women presented with symptoms during pregnancy while 44% were asymptomatic. Heart failure is by far the most common symptom occurring in almost half the cases. Uncommon clinical presentations included a heart attack, a stroke, and pulmonary hypertension. Timing of delivery was reported preterm in 58% of cases and at term in 42%. Eleven women gave birth through vaginal delivery, while 15 (58%) underwent a CS. Our reported case is the first case of a pregnancy where both mother and fetus are affected by LVNC and the fetus is diagnosed prenatally. CONCLUSIONS: LVNC is not a contraindication for pregnancy, but clearly increases the risk of preterm birth and the rate of cesarean section. On the other hand, pregnancy in a LVNC patient exposes her to increased risk of clinical deterioration. Further studies are needed to better characterize the management of pregnancies in women with cardiomyopathies.