Prognostic Value of Hormonal Abnormalities in Heart Failure Patients.

The model used to explain the pathophysiologic substrate and progressive worsening in chronic heart failure (CHF) is based on the hyperactivity of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and adrenergic pathway. Although the neurohormonal medical approach has many advantages, it has several pitfalls, as demonstrated by high rates of CHF mortality and hospitalization. A growing body of evidence has led to the hypothesis that CHF is a multiple hormone deficiency syndrome, characterized by a reduced anabolic drive that has relevant functional and prognostic implications. The aim of this review is to summarize the evidence of reduced drive of main anabolic axes in CHF.

Heart rate during exercise: mechanisms, behavior, and therapeutic and prognostic implications in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.

Exercise intolerance is a typical manifestation of patients affected by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, the relationship among functional capacity, mortality, and exercise-induced heart rate response during exercise remains unclear in either sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation subjects. Heart rate increase during incremental load exercise has a typical pattern in normal subjects, whereas it is commonly compromised in HFrEF patients, mainly due to the imbalance of the autonomic nervous system. In the present review, we aim to describe the behavior of heart rate during exercise in normal subjects and in HFrEF patients in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation, understanding and explaining the mechanism leading to a different exercise performance and functional limitation. Moreover, the role of chronotropic incompetence and the need of standardizing the cutoff criteria are also discussed in order to clarify the clinical importance, the prognostic relevance, and the potential therapeutic implications of this condition. Looking into the relative contribution and interaction of heart rate response during exercise might represent an important issue to guide individualized therapeutic interventions and prognostic assessment in HFrEF patients.

Effects of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors and Sodium-Glucose Linked coTransporter-2 Inhibitors on cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors (DPP4-I) and Sodium-Glucose Linked coTransporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT2-I) improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, only few studies were designed to assess the efficacy and safety of these drugs on cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effects of DPP4-Is and SGLT2-Is on CV events and mortality by meta-analysis. METHODS: Randomized trials enrolling more than 200 patients, comparing DPP-4-Is or SGLT2-Is versus placebo or active treatments in patients with DM, and reporting at least one event among all-cause and CV mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and new onset of heart failure (HF), were included. RESULTS: 157 randomized trials (114 on DPP4-Is and 43 on SGLT2-Is) enrolling 140,470 patients (107,100 in DPP4-I and 33,370 in SGLT2-I studies) were included in the analysis. Compared to control, treatment with DPP4-Is did not affect all-cause (RR: 1.010; 95% CI: 0.935-1.091) and CV (RR: 0.975; CI: 0.887-1.073) mortality as well as risk of MI (RR: 0.915; CI: 0.835-1.002), stroke (RR: 0.933; CI: 0.820-1.062) and HF (RR: 1.083; CI: 0.973-1.205). Treatment with SGLT2-Is significantly reduced the risk of all-cause death by 28% (RR: 0.718; CI: 0.613-0.840), CV death by 33% (RR: 0.668; CI: 0.544-0.821), MI by 20% (RR: 0.803; CI: 0.668-0.965) and HF by 35% (RR: 0.652; CI: 0.517-0.823) without effect on stroke (RR: 1.158; CI: 0.912-1.469). CONCLUSIONS: DPP4-Is show a safe CV profile as they do not affect mortality and CV events, including HF, in patients with type 2 DM. SGLT2-Is are associated with improved CV outcome and survival in DM patients.