Second-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease with mesenchymal stromal cells: A decision model.

OBJECTIVE: No standard second-line treatment exists for acute graft-versus-host disease steroid-refractory (SR-aGvHD), and long-term outcomes remain poor. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been evaluated as treatment, but no disease model (DM) exists that integrates and extrapolates currently available evidence. The aim of this study was to develop such a DM to describe the natural history of SR-aGvHD and to predict long-term outcomes. METHOD: The DM was developed in collaboration with experts in haematology-oncology. Subsequently, a model simulation was run. Input parameters for transition and survival estimates were informed by published data of clinical trials on MSC treatment for SR-aGvHD. Parametric distributions were used to estimate long-term survival rates after MSCs. RESULTS: The newly developed DM is a cohort model that consists of eight health states. For the model simulation, we obtained data on 327 patients from 14 published phase II trials. Due to limited evidence, DM structure was simplified and several assumptions had to be made. Median overall survival was 3.2 years for complete response and 0.5 years for no complete response. CONCLUSION: The DM provides a comprehensive overview on the second-line treatment pathway for aGvHD and enables long-term predictions that can be used to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing any treatment for SR-aGvHD.

Safety of allogeneic bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in renal transplant recipients: the neptune study.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) may serve as an attractive therapy in renal transplantation due to their immunosuppressive and reparative properties. While most studies have used autologous MSCs, allogeneic MSCs offer the advantage of immediate availability for clinical use. This is of major importance for indications where instant treatment is needed, for example allograft rejection or calcineurin inhibitor toxicity. Clinical studies using allogeneic MSCs are limited in number. Although these studies showed no adverse reactions, allogeneic MSCs could possibly elicit an anti-donor immune response, which may increase the incidence of rejection and impact the allograft survival in the long term. These safety issues should be addressed before further studies are planned with allogeneic MSCs in the solid organ transplant setting. METHODS/DESIGN: 10 renal allograft recipients, 18-75 years old, will be included in this clinical phase Ib, open label, single center study. Patients will receive two doses of 1.5 × 10(6) per/kg body weight allogeneic bone marrow derived MSCs intravenously, at 25 and 26 weeks after transplantation, when immune suppression levels are reduced. The primary end point of this study is safety by assessing biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR)/graft loss after MSC treatment. Secondary end points, all measured before and after MSC infusions, include: comparison of fibrosis in renal biopsy by quantitative Sirius Red scoring; de novo HLA antibody development and extensive immune monitoring; renal function measured by cGFR and iohexol clearance; CMV and BK infection and other opportunistic infections. DISCUSSION: This study will provide information on the safety of allogeneic MSC infusion and its effect on the incidence of BPAR/graft loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02387151.

Autologous bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in combination with everolimus to preserve renal structure and function in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation has improved survival and quality of life for patients with end-stage renal disease. Despite excellent short-term results due to better and more potent immunosuppressive drugs, long-term survival of transplanted kidneys has not improved accordingly in the last decades. Consequently there is a strong interest in immunosuppressive regimens that maintain efficacy for the prevention of rejection, whilst preserving renal structure and function. In this respect the infusion of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may be an interesting immune suppressive strategy. MSCs have immune suppressive properties and actively contribute to tissue repair. In experimental animal studies the combination of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor and MSCs was shown to attenuate allo immune responses and to promote allograft tolerance. The current study will test the hypothesis that MSC treatment, in combination with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, facilitates tacrolimus withdrawal, reduces fibrosis and decreases the incidence of opportunistic infections compared to standard tacrolimus dose. METHODS/DESIGN: 70 renal allograft recipients, 18-75 years old, will be included in this Phase II, open label, randomized, non-blinded, prospective, single centre clinical study. Patients in the MSC treated group will receive two doses of autologous bone marrow derived MSCs IV (target 1,5 x 10(6), Range 1-2 x 10(6) million MSCs per/kg body weight), 7 days apart, 6 and 7 weeks transplantation in combination with everolimus and prednisolone. At the time of the second MSC infusion tacrolimus will be reduced to 50% and completely withdrawn 1 week later. Patients in the control group will receive everolimus, prednisolone and standard dose tacrolimus. The primary end point is to compare fibrosis by quantitative Sirius Red scoring of MSC treated and untreated groups at 6 months compared to 4 weeks post-transplant. Secondary end points include: composite end point efficacy failure (Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection, graft loss or death); renal function and proteinuria; opportunistic infections; immune monitoring and "subclinical" cardiovascular disease groups by assessing echocardiography in the different treatment groups. DISCUSSION: This study will provide information whether MSCs in combination with everolimus can be used for tacrolimus withdrawal, and whether this strategy leads to preservation of renal structure and function in renal recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02057965.

Differential immunomodulatory effects of fetal versus maternal multipotent stromal cells.

Protective mechanisms are likely to be present at the fetomaternal interface because fetus-specific alloreactive T cells present in the decidua do not harm the fetus. We tested the immunosuppressive capacity of maternal and fetal multipotent stromal cells (MSC). Single cell suspensions were made from second-trimester amnion, amniotic fluid, and decidua. Culture-expanded cells were identified as MSC based on phenotype and multilineage potential. Coculture of MSC in a primary mixed lymphocyte culture of unrelated responder-stimulator combinations resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of proliferation. Fetal MSC demonstrated a significantly higher inhibition compared with maternal MSC. This stronger inhibition by fetal MSC was even more prominent in a secondary mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) with primed alloreactive T cells. Analysis of cytokine production revealed that fetal MSC produced significantly more interleukin (IL)-10 and vascular endothelial growth factor than maternal MSC. Cell-cell contact is needed for part of the inhibitory effects of MSC. In addition, soluble factors play a role because blocking experiments with anti-IL-10 revealed that the inhibition of the MLR response by fetal MSC is mainly mediated by IL-10. For maternal MSC, other soluble factors seem to be involved. Fetal MSC derived from the fetomaternal interface have a stronger inhibitory effect on naive and antigen-experienced T cells compared with maternal MSC, which is probably related to their higher IL-10 production.

Impaired effector memory T-cell regulation facilitates graft versus host disease in CCR7-deficient bone marrow transplant chimeras.

BACKGROUND: The development of graft versus host disease (GvHD) is one of the major challenges of bone marrow transplantations (BMTs). Although clinical symptoms of GvHD share many features with auto immune diseases, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we examined the effects of hematopoietic CC-chemokine receptor (CCR)7 deficiency on the development of GvHD. METHODS: Lethally irradiated C57BL/6 mice were transplanted with bone marrow cells derived from wild-type or CCR7 C57BL/6 donor mice. RESULTS: Unlike littermate controls, CCR7 chimeras develop overt GvHD-like symptoms within 6 weeks after transplantation. Circulating CD4 and CD8 T-cell populations of CCR7 chimeras were enriched in effector memory T cells. CCR7 CD62L regulatory T-cell expansion, which typically occurs after BMT was markedly delayed in CCR7 chimeras. Furthermore, GvHD-like reactions did not occur after cotransplantation of wild-type and CCR7 bone marrow, showing that CCR7 is critically required for tolerance induction and prevention of GvHD. CONCLUSIONS: We are the first to demonstrate that lack of CCR7 results in delayed regulatory T-cell expansion. This results in insufficient control of effector memory T-cell expansion, which eventually leads to severe tissue damage. Conceivably, therapies aimed at boosting CD4 CD62L regulatory T-cell expansion after BMT could help to control GvHD.

Overall and event-free survival are not improved by the use of myeloablative therapy following intensified chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized phase 3 study.

We compared the efficacy of intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy and autologous stem cell rescue with intensified chemotherapy alone in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma. There were 261 eligible patients younger than 66 years with stage II/III multiple myeloma who were randomized after remission induction therapy with vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) to receive intensified chemotherapy, that is, melphalan 140 mg/m(2) administered intravenously in 2 doses of 70 mg/m(2) (intermediate-dose melphalan [IDM]) without stem cell rescue (n = 129) or the same regimen followed by myeloablative therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, total body irradiation, and autologous stem cell reinfusion (n = 132). Interferon-alpha-2a was given as maintenance. Of the eligible patients, 79% received both cycles of IDM and 79% of allocated patients actually received myeloablative treatment. The response rate (complete remission [CR] plus partial remission [PR]) was 88% in the intensified chemotherapy group versus 95% in the myeloablative treatment group. CR was significantly higher after myeloablative therapy (13% versus 29%; P =.002). With a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 8-65 months), the event-free survival (EFS) was not different between the treatments (median 21 months versus 22 months; P =.28). Time to progression (TTP) was significantly longer after myeloablative treatment (25 months versus 31 months; P =.04). The overall survival (OS) was not different (50 months versus 47 months; P =.41). Intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy as first-line treatment for multiple myeloma resulted in a higher CR and a longer TTP when compared with intensified chemotherapy alone. However, it did not result in a better EFS and OS.