Validation of questionnaires for restless legs syndrome in the general population: the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT).

Questionnaires for restless legs syndrome have rarely been validated against face-to-face interviews in the general population. We aimed to validate the modified Norwegian, seven-item Cambridge-Hopkins restless legs syndrome questionnaire and a single diagnostic question for restless legs syndrome. We also aimed to stratify validity at 65 years of age. Among a random sample of 1,201 participants from the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study, 232 (19%) agreed to participate, out of whom 221 had complete data for analyses. Participants completed the questionnaires for restless legs syndrome immediately before attending a face-to-face interview using the latest diagnostic criteria. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's kappa statistic (κ) of questionnaire- versus interview-based diagnoses. We found acceptable validity of the seven-item modified Cambridge-Hopkins diagnostic questionnaire for restless legs syndrome (κ = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.51) and good validity of the single diagnostic question (κ = 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.58). We also found good validity through the combination of modified Cambridge-Hopkins diagnostic questionnaire for restless legs syndrome items 2 and 5, while item 1 or 2 alone showed only acceptable validity. The single diagnostic question was significantly more valid among those aged <65 years (κ = 0.60 versus κ = 0.26). Both single- and two-item questionnaire-based diagnoses overestimated interview-based restless legs syndrome prevalence. The seven-item modified Cambridge-Hopkins diagnostic questionnaire for restless legs syndrome will be useful for epidemiological studies although low sensitivity may cause underestimation of true restless legs syndrome prevalence in the general population, especially among elderly. Brief questionnaire-based diagnoses of up to three items seem best utilised as an initial screen. Future studies should identify brief and even more valid questionnaire-based diagnoses for restless legs syndrome in order to estimate prevalence accurately in large epidemiological studies.

Validation of insomnia questionnaires in the general population: The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT).

The primary aim was to validate questionnaire-based insomnia diagnoses from a modified Karolinska Sleep Questionnaire (KSQ) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), by age category (< or >65 years), against a semi-structured face-to-face interview. Secondary aims were to split validity by diagnostic certainty of the interview and to compare prevalence estimates of questionnaire- and interview-based diagnoses. A total of 232 out of 1,200 invited (19.3%) from the fourth Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4) completed questionnaires, including the KSQ and ISI, shortly before attending a face-to-face diagnostic interview for insomnia based on the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Both a tentative (DSM-5 criteria A-E) and a definite (criteria A-H) interview diagnosis was evaluated. Cohen's kappa statistic quantified questionnaire validity. In all, 33% (95% confidence interval 27-39%) of participants had definite insomnia: 40% of women and 21% of men. The ISI (cut-off 12) and several KSQ-based diagnoses showed very good validity (κ ≤0.74) against the tentative, versus good validity (κ ≤0.61) against the definite interview diagnosis. Short questionnaires, requiring a daytime symptom at least three times a week, may underestimate insomnia prevalence. Validity was consistently higher for persons aged below versus above 65 years (definite insomnia: κ ≤0.64 vs. κ ≤0.56). Our results have implications for epidemiological population-based studies utilising insomnia questionnaires.

Validation of Trøndelag Apnoea Score Proxy for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea in the General Population of Norway: The HUNT Study.

The aim was to validate a new seven-item "TASC" (Trøndelag Apnoea Score) proxy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) against polysomnography in the general population. Objectives included validation against different polysomnographic criteria, stratification by age and gender, and estimation of OSA prevalence. From the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4), 1,201 participants were randomly invited to a substudy focusing on sleep and headaches, of whom 232 accepted and 84 (64% women, mean age 55.0 years, and standard deviation 11.5 years) underwent polysomnography. The TASC proxy sums seven binary items for snoring, observed breathing pauses, restricted daytime activities, hypertension, body mass index (≥30 kg/m2), age (≥50 years), and gender (male). A single night of ambulatory (home) polysomnography was analysed using both the recommended and optional hypopnoea criteria of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM). We found 65% sensitivity and 87% specificity (Cohen's κ = 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.72) for TASC ≥ 3 against AHI ≥ 15 (recommended AASM criteria). Validity was similar against AHI ≥ 30 but lower against AHI ≥ 5 and against the optional AASM criteria. Sensitivity and overall validity were higher among men and those above 50 years of age. The prevalence of an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) of at least 5, 15, or 30 using the recommended (and optional) AASM criteria was 73% (46%), 37% (18%), or 15% (5%). A seven-item TASC proxy for OSA showed good validity and may be useful in screening and epidemiological settings. Sensitivity, specificity, and validity vary considerably by cut-off, by polysomnographic scoring criteria, and by gender and age strata.