RESUMO
Background: Health inequalities remain a persistent problem in the UK. One contributing factor may be how health inequalities are framed in professional and public debate. Dominant understandings of health focus on the individual, personal choice, lifestyle and (un)healthy behaviour. This project sought to reframe health inequalities as a 'systemic' or structural problem using extant guidance. This was intended to support the work of a local authority in England working to address health inequalities. Project design: An academic-practitioner participatory knowledge mobilisation exercise with a local authority public health team using recent guidance and reflective feedback and the iterative development of actionable tools. There were four discrete stages to the exercise. Methods: Two on-line and one face-to-face participatory, deliberative workshops designed to co-create reframed public health challenges and solutions based on team portfolios. Iterative feedback provided by the researcher to support the development of actionable tools. Results: Six topic areas were developed with a systemic framing: 1. Food insecurity, 2. Obesity, 3. Prostate cancer among Black men, 4. Cost of living, 5. Mental health, suicide prevention and Gypsy, Roma, Traveller communities, 6. Healthy streets. Reflections from the process revealed some perceived advantages of engaging in a systemic framing of the wider determinants of health, some limitations and issues to consider in a local setting. Benefits included: Clarity in a complex field; structured thinking about what to communicate and how; eliminated jargon; could be made locally relevant. Challenges included: Sustaining a consistent framing; maintaining the technique; knowing if was making a difference; slipping back into dominant (individualised) framings, especially in free-flowing discussion. Conclusions: The process of reframing the wider determinants of health using recent guidance in a local authority setting was broadly helpful in developing coherence and consistency across the public health team. There were challenges to adopting the approach and evaluation of its impact locally would be beneficial.