Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 2024 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960831

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Interest in passive flow filter systems to remove sevoflurane from anaesthetic machine exhaust have increased recently to mitigate the environmental impact of volatile anaesthetics. These filter systems consist of chemically activated carbon, with limited evidence on their performance characteristics. We hypothesised that their efficiency depends on filter material. METHODS: Binding capacity was tested for three carbon filter materials (CONTRAfluran®, FlurAbsorb®, and Anaesthetic Agent Filter AAF633). Adsorption efficiency and resistive pressure were determined during simulated ventilation at different stages of filter saturation and fresh gas flow. In addition, sevoflurane concentration in filtered gas was measured at randomly selected anaesthesia workstations. RESULTS: Sevoflurane concentration in filtered gas exceeded 10 ppm when saturated with 184 ml sevoflurane each for CONTRAfluran and FlurAbsorb and 276 ml for AAF633. During simulated ventilation, sevoflurane concentration >10 ppm passed through CONTRAfluran and AAF633 at fresh gas flow 10 L min-1 only at maximum saturation, but through FlurAbsorb at all stages of saturation. The resistance pressure of all filters was negligible during simulated ventilation, but increased up to 5.2 (0.2) cm H2O during simulated coughing. At two of seven anaesthesia workstations, sevoflurane concentration in filtered exhaust gas was >10 ppm. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the filter material and saturation, the likelihood of sevoflurane passing through passive flow carbon filters depends on the filter material and fresh gas flow. Combining the filter systems with anaesthetic gas scavenging systems could protect from pollution of ambient air with sevoflurane.

2.
Adv Mater ; 34(2): e2104555, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34545651

RESUMO

Personalized antibiotherapy ensures that the antibiotic concentration remains in the optimal therapeutic window to maximize efficacy, minimize side effects, and avoid the emergence of drug resistance due to insufficient dosing. However, such individualized schemes need frequent sampling to tailor the blood antibiotic concentrations. To optimally integrate therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) into the clinical workflow, antibiotic levels can either be measured in blood using point-of-care testing (POCT), or can rely on noninvasive sampling. Here, a versatile biosensor with an antibody-free assay for on-site TDM is presented. The platform is evaluated with an animal study, where antibiotic concentrations are quantified in different matrices including whole blood, plasma, urine, saliva, and exhaled breath condensate (EBC). The clearance and the temporal evaluation of antibiotic levels in EBC and plasma are demonstrated. Influence of matrix effects on measured drug concentrations is determined by comparing the plasma levels with those in noninvasive samples. The system's potential for blood-based POCT is further illustrated by tracking ß-lactam concentrations in untreated blood samples. Finally, multiplexing capabilities are explored successfully for multianalyte/sample analysis. By enabling a rapid, low-cost, sample-independent, and multiplexed on-site TDM, this system can shift the paradigm of "one-size-fits-all" strategy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Técnicas Biossensoriais , Animais , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Testes Imediatos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA