RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The current retrospective study was intended to obtain up-to-date and comprehensive data on surgical practice for breast cancer throughout France, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the more recent surgical techniques of oncoplastic surgery (OPS). METHODS: In June 2011, e-mail surveys were sent to 33 nationally renowned breast cancer surgeons from French public or private hospitals. The questionnaire focused on all the new cases of breast cancer treated in 2010. It included questions regarding surgical practices, with special emphases on NAC and OPS and other surgical characteristics. RESULTS: The overall response rate for the survey was 72.7 %. The total number of breast cancer cases from the survey was 13,762, which constitutes 26.2 % of the total incidence in 2010. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was performed for 71.0 % of the patients, and the results were similar throughout the types of practices. Of these patients, 13.9 % received OPS, either upfront or after NAC. Mastectomy was performed for 29.0 % of the patients, which is consistent with French official numbers. Among all patients, 16.3 % underwent surgery after NAC. CONCLUSION: To the authors' knowledge, there are no publications of national figures on NAC or OPS rates to date. They are convinced that this study offers real-life surgical care information on a large population and covers France's breast cancer surgical landscape. Mastectomy rates in France remain stable and consistent with those in other European countries. However, additional large-scale retrospective studies are required to confirm these figures and further explore NAC and OPS rates as well as surgical practice characteristics.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Mastectomia Segmentar/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , França , Hospitais Privados/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgia Plástica , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) in patients for whom mastectomy (MT) was, initially, the only conceivable surgical option. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2007 and 2012, 168 patients from a single center received nCT. Among these patients, we focused on the ones who received nCT (n = 119, [70.8%]) to decrease tumor size and thus to potentially allow a conservative surgical treatment. For these patients, MT was initially the only possible surgical treatment. RESULTS: Among the 119 patients included, 118 presented with an invasive ductal carcinoma. The mean tumor size before nCT, measured using magnetic resonance imaging, was 41.6 mm (range, 15-110 mm) and 25.3 mm (range, 0-90 mm) after nCT. Eighty-six patients (72.3%) underwent BCS, and oncoplastic techniques were used in 29 patients (33.6%). Only 4.3% (5 patients) of patients who were treated with BCS needed additional surgery because of positive surgical margins. The median follow-up was 41.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.2-48.3). Five-year overall survival after BCS and MT were 77% (95% CI, 63-92) and 77% (95% CI, 63-95) respectively. Five-year disease-free survival after BCS and MT were 74% (95% CI, 64-86) and 59% (95% CI, 40-89) (not significant), respectively. CONCLUSION: nCT for selective patients with "chemosensitive" breast tumor leads to a significant "MT to BCS" conversion rate. The type of surgery does not seem to affect the patient's overall and disease-free survival rates. Oncoplastic procedures can help to extend BCS after nCT.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Autologous fat transfer (AFT) enhances the cosmetic results of breast reconstruction and corrects breast conserving operation sequelae. The question of its oncological safety remains, as in-vitro experiences have shown that adipocytes can stimulate cancer cell proliferation. This study analysed the records of patients who had AFT after breast cancer from 2004-2009. The primary end-point was cancer recurrence. The secondary end-points were AFT complications and post-AFT mammogram modifications. Sixty-four patients (100 AFT) were included. The mean follow-up for AFT was 46.44 months (SD = 21.4). Two breast cancer recurrences were recorded (3.1%). Among 55 mammograms analysed, only one patient presented radiological abnormalities. One complication of AFT (donor-site infection) was recorded. This series is in favour of the oncological safety of AFT after breast cancer. An accurate evaluation of the recurrence risk, before performing AFT, is an essential prerequisite and must lead one to postpone or avoid this procedure in high-risk patients.
Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo/transplante , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Adulto , Biópsia por Agulha , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Mamografia/métodos , Mastectomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Reoperação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/irrigação sanguínea , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo/efeitos adversos , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Implant choice after Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) is a problematic perioperative issue. In this retrospective study, the authors searched for a correlation between mastectomy weight and implant volume choice after NSM. A mathematical expression of this correlation was found that might help surgeons decide implant volume after NSM.
Assuntos
Implante Mamário/instrumentação , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Mastectomia Subcutânea , Carga Tumoral , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess early clinical results and evaluate patient satisfaction in case of second conservative treatment (2nd CT) combining lumpectomy plus high-dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy for patients (pts) presenting with ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From June 2005 to July 2009, 42 pts presenting with an IBCR underwent a second lumpectomy with intraoperative implantation of plastic tubes in the tumor bed. After performing the dose distribution analysis on the postimplant CT scan, a total dose of 34 Gy in 10 fractions over 5 consecutive days was delivered. Toxicity evaluation was based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 criteria. Applying a visual analogic scale (VAS) analysis, patient satisfaction regarding cosmetic result and 2nd CT possibility was performed after the end of brachytherapy. RESULTS: Median followup was 21 months (range, 6-50 months) and median age at the time of local recurrence was 65 years (range, 30-85 years). Median delay between primary and recurrence was 11 years (range, 1-35 years). Median recurrence tumor size was 12 mm (range, 2-30 mm). Median number of plastic tubes and planes were nine (range, 5-12) and two (range, 1-3), respectively. Median clinical target volume was 68 cc (range, 31.2-146 cc). Second local control rate was 97%. Twenty-two pts (60%) developed complications. Cutaneous and subcutaneous fibrosis was the most frequent side effect. Median VAS satisfaction score regarding cosmetic result was 7 of 10 (range, 4-9), whereas median VAS satisfaction score for 2nd CT was 10 of 10 (range, 8-10). CONCLUSION: A 2nd CT for IBCR using high-dose rate brachytherapy seems feasible with encouraging results in terms of second local control with an acceptable toxicity. Patient satisfaction regarding the possibility of second breast preservation should be considered.