RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The management of radiologically suspected gallbladder cancers (GBC) that lack definitive radiological features usually involves performing a first-stage routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy, followed by an open second-stage liver resection (segments IVB and V) and hilar lymphadenectomy (extended cholecystectomy) if subsequent formal histology confirms a malignancy. Performing a cholecystectomy with an intraoperative frozen section to guide the need for conversion to an extended cholecystectomy as a single-stage procedure has multiple benefits compared to a two-stage approach. However, the safety and efficacy of this approach have not yet been evaluated in a tertiary setting. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using a database of all consecutive patients with suspected GBC who had been referred to our tertiary unit. Following routine cholecystectomy, depending on the operative findings, the gallbladder specimen was removed and sent for frozen-section analysis. If malignancy was confirmed, the depth of tumour invasion was evaluated, followed by simultaneous extended cholecystectomy, when appropriate. The sensitivity and specificity of frozen section analysis for the diagnosis of GBC were measured using formal histopathology as a reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 37 consecutive cholecystectomies were performed. In nine cases, GBC was confirmed by intraoperative frozen section analysis, three of which had standard cholecystectomy only as their frozen section showed adenocarcinoma to be T1a or below (n=2) or were undetermined (n=1). In the remaining six cases, malignant invasion beyond the muscularis propria (T1b or above) was confirmed; thus, a synchronous extended cholecystectomy was performed. The sensitivity (95% CI 66.4%-100%) and specificity (95% CI 87.7%-100%) for identifying GBC using frozen section analysis were both 100%. The net cost of the single-stage pathway in comparison to the two-stage pathway resulted in overall savings of £3894. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative frozen section analysis is a reliable tool for guiding the use of a safe, single-stage approach for the management of GBC in radiologically equivocal cases. In addition to its lower costs compared to a conventional two-stage procedure, intraoperative analysis also affords the benefit of a single hospital admission and single administration of general anaesthesia, thus greatly enhancing the patient's experience and relieving the burden on waiting lists.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical equipoise exists regarding optimal sequencing in the definitive management of choledocholithiasis. Our current study compares sequential biliary ductal clearance and cholecystectomy at an interval to simultaneous laparoendoscopic management on index admission in a pragmatic retrospective manner. METHODS: Records were reviewed for all patients admitted between January 2015 and December 2018 to a Swedish and an Irish university hospital. Both hospitals differ in their practice patterns for definitive management of choledocholithiasis. At the Swedish hospital, patients with choledocholithiasis underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at index admission (one stage). In contrast, interval day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy followed index admission ERCP (two stages) at the Irish hospital. Clinical characteristics, postprocedural complications, and inpatient duration were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-seven patients underwent treatment for choledocholithiasis during the study period, of whom 222 (62.2%) underwent a one-stage procedure in Sweden, while 135 (37.8%) underwent treatment in two stages in Ireland. Patients in both cohorts were closely matched in terms of age, sex, and preoperative serum total bilirubin. Patients in the one-stage group exhibited a greater inflammatory reaction on index admission (peak C-reactive protein, 136 ± 137 vs. 95 ± 102 mg/L; p = 0.024), had higher incidence of comorbidities (age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, ≥3; 37.8% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.003), and overall were less fit for surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists, ≥3; 11.7% vs. 3.7%; p < 0.001). Despite this, a significantly shorter mean time to definitive treatment, that is, cholecystectomy (3.1 ± 2.5 vs. 40.3 ± 127 days, p = 0.017), without excess morbidity, was seen in the one-stage compared with the two-stage cohort. Patients in the one-stage cohort experienced shorter mean postprocedure length of stay (3.0 ± 4.7 vs. 5.0 ± 4.6 days, p < 0.001) and total length of hospital stay (6.5 ± 4.6 vs. 9.0 ± 7.3 days, p = 0.002). The only significant difference in postoperative complications between the cohorts was urinary retention, with a higher incidence in the one-stage cohort (19% vs. 1%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Where appropriate expertise and logistics exist within developing models of acute care surgery worldwide, consideration should be given to index-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative ERCP for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Our data suggest that this strategy significantly shortens the time to definitive treatment and decreases total hospital stay without any excess in adverse outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management Level IV.