Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Public Health ; : e1-e13, 2024 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39146518

RESUMO

Objectives. To assess differences in contextual factors by intent among pediatric firearm injury patients and determine factors associated with data missingness. Methods. We retrospectively queried the American College of Surgeons Firearm Study database (March 1, 2021-February 28, 2022) for patients aged 18 years or younger. We stratified preinjury, firearm-related, and event-related factors by intent and compared them by using Fisher exact, χ2, or 1-way analysis of variance testing. Secondary analysis estimated the adjusted odds of missingness by using generalized linear modeling with binominal logit link. Results. Among 17 395 patients, 2974 (17.1%) were aged 18 years or younger; 1966 (66.1%) were injured by assault, 579 (19.5%) unintentionally, and 76 (2.6%) by self-inflicted means. Most contextual factors differed by intent, including proportion of youths with previous adverse childhood experiences, mental illness, and violent assaults or injury, firearm type and access, perpetrator relationship, and injury location. In adjusted analyses, age, trauma center designation, intent, and admission status were associated with missingness. Conclusions. Contextual factors related to pediatric firearm injury vary by intent. Specific predictors associated with missingness may inform improved future data collection. Public Health Implications. Contextual factors related to pediatric firearm injury can be obtained in a systematic manner nationally to inform targeted interventions. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print August 15, 2024:e1-e13. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307754).

2.
J Burn Care Res ; 2024 Jul 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984771

RESUMO

Soft casts have been introduced as an efficacious strategy to manage hand burns that simplifies wound care for families. We hypothesized that the outpatient use of soft casts in pediatric hand burns would be viewed as acceptable by patient caregivers and providers, logistically feasible, and result in satisfactory clinical outcomes. A review was performed of pediatric clinic patients managed with soft casts since implementation (9/2022 - 9/2023). Patient caregivers and providers were surveyed. The primary outcome was acceptability of soft casts as a management strategy (questions targeted care burden, overall satisfaction, comfort, pragmatism, and healing concerns). Secondary outcome was feasibility (effect on clinic workflow, efficiency). Survey responses were collected from 70% of caregivers and 95% of providers. Responses overwhelmingly favored soft cast acceptability. Among providers, 84% agreed that "the soft cast method simplified the hand burn care experience in our clinic" and 100% indicated "the soft cast was easy for parents to manage at home" (Likert range 7-10, mode 10). Thirty-three English-speaking patients with partial and full thickness hand burns were managed with soft casts. A mean of 1.8 reapplications (mode 1, range 1-5) were required with median healing time of 13 days. No infections were attributed to the use of soft casting, and only one patient ultimately required grafting. Overall, the introduction of soft casts as a management strategy for pediatric hand burns was acceptable and feasible. The clinical outcomes assessed suggest soft casts are associated with good wound healing with minimal wound care responsibilities for patient and family.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA