A possible molecular basis for photoprotection in the minor antenna proteins of plants.

The bioenergetics of light-harvesting by photosynthetic antenna proteins in higher plants is well understood. However, investigation into the regulatory non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) mechanism, which dissipates excess energy in high light, has led to several conflicting models. It is generally accepted that the major photosystem II antenna protein, LHCII, is the site of NPQ, although the minor antenna complexes (CP24/26/29) are also proposed as alternative/additional NPQ sites. LHCII crystals were shown to exhibit the short excitation lifetime and several spectral signatures of the quenched state. Subsequent structure-based models showed that this quenching could be explained by slow energy trapping by the carotenoids, in line with one of the proposed models. Using Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) we show that the crystal structure of CP29 corresponds to a strongly quenched conformation. Using a structure-based theoretical model we show that this quenching may be explained by the same slow, carotenoid-mediated quenching mechanism present in LHCII crystals.

The carotenoid pathway: what is important for excitation quenching in plant antenna complexes?

Plant light-harvesting is regulated by the Non-Photochemical Quenching (NPQ) mechanism involving the reversible formation of excitation quenching sites in the Photosystem II (PSII) antenna in response to high light. While the major antenna complex, LHCII, is known to be a site of NPQ, the precise mechanism of excitation quenching is not clearly understood. A preliminary model of the quenched crystal structure of LHCII implied that quenching arises from slow energy capture by Car pigments. It predicted a thoroughly quenched system but offered little insight into the defining aspects of this quenching. In this work, we present a thorough theoretical investigation of this quenching, addressing the factors defining the quenching pathway and possible mechanism for its (de)activation. We show that quenching in LHCII crystals is the result of slow energy transfer from chlorophyll to the centrally-bound lutein Cars, predominantly the Lut620 associated with the chlorophyll 'terminal emitter', one of the proposed in vivo pathways. We show that this quenching is rather independent of the particular species of Car and excitation 'site' energy. The defining parameter is the resonant coupling between the pigment co-factors. Lastly, we show that these interactions must be severely suppressed for a light-harvesting state to be recovered.

Fine control of chlorophyll-carotenoid interactions defines the functionality of light-harvesting proteins in plants.

Photosynthetic antenna proteins can be thought of as "programmed solvents", which bind pigments at specific mutual orientations, thus tuning the overall energetic landscape and ensuring highly efficient light-harvesting. While positioning of chlorophyll cofactors is well understood and rationalized by the principle of an "energy funnel", the carotenoids still pose many open questions. Particularly, their short excited state lifetime (<25 ps) renders them potential energy sinks able to compete with the reaction centers and drastically undermine light-harvesting efficiency. Exploration of the orientational phase-space revealed that the placement of central carotenoids minimizes their interaction with the nearest chlorophylls in the plant antenna complexes LHCII, CP26, CP29 and LHCI. At the same time we show that this interaction is highly sensitive to structural perturbations, which has a profound effect on the overall lifetime of the complex. This links the protein dynamics to the light-harvesting regulation in plants by the carotenoids.