The Pain in Dystonia Scale (PIDS)-Development and Validation in Cervical Dystonia.

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of pain in adult-onset idiopathic dystonia (AOID) is needed to implement effective therapeutic strategies. OBJECTIVE: To develop a new rating instrument for pain in AOID and validate it in cervical dystonia (CD). METHODS: Development and validation of the Pain in Dystonia Scale (PIDS) comprised three phases. In phase 1, international experts and participants with AOID generated and evaluated the preliminary items for content validity. In phase 2, the PIDS was drafted and revised by the experts, followed by cognitive interviews to ensure self-administration suitability. In phase 3, the PIDS psychometric properties were assessed in 85 participants with CD and retested in 40 participants. RESULTS: The final version of PIDS evaluates pain severity (by body-part), functional impact, and external modulating factors. Test-retest reliability showed a high-correlation coefficient for the total score (0.9, P < 0.001), and intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.7 or higher for all items in all body-parts subscores. The overall PIDS severity score showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α, 0.9). Convergent validity analysis revealed a strong correlation between the PIDS severity score and the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale pain subscale (0.8, P < 0.001) and the Brief Pain Inventory-short form items related to pain at time of the assessment (0.7, P < 0.001) and impact of pain on daily functioning (0.7, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The PIDS is the first specific questionnaire developed to evaluate pain in all patients with AOID, here, demonstrating high-level psychometric properties in people with CD. Future work will validate PIDS in other forms of AOID. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

A Modified Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale for Virtual Assessments.

BACKGROUND: The reliability of the Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) using teleneurology has not been assessed. OBJECTIVES: To test whether removing items inadequately assessed by video would impact measurement of PSP severity and progression. METHODS: We performed secondary analyses of two data sets: the phase 2/3 trial of Davunetide in PSP and a large single-center cohort. We examined two modifications of the PSPRS: (1) removing neck rigidity, limb rigidity, and postural stability (25 items; mPSPRS-25) and (2) also removing three ocular motor items and limb dystonia (21 items; mPSPRS-21). Proportional agreement relative to the possible total scores was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient, compared to the original PSPRS baseline values and change over 6 and 12 months. We examined the ability of both scales to predict survival in the single-center cohort using proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The mPSPRS-25 showed excellent agreement (0.99; P < 0.001) with the original PSPRS at baseline, 0.98 (P < 0.001) agreement in measuring change over 6 months, and 0.98 (P < 0.001) over 12 months. The mPSPRS-21 showed agreement of 0.94 (P < 0.001) with the original PSPRS at baseline, 0.92 (P < 0.001) at 6 months, and 0.95 (P < 0.001) at 12 months. Baseline and 6-month change in both modified scales were highly predictive of survival in the single-center cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Modified versions of the PSPRS which can be administered remotely show excellent agreement with the original scale and predict survival in PSP. The mPSPRS-21 should facilitate clinical care and research in PSP via teleneurology. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

A Multi-center Genome-wide Association Study of Cervical Dystonia.

BACKGROUND: Several monogenic causes for isolated dystonia have been identified, but they collectively account for only a small proportion of cases. Two genome-wide association studies have reported a few potential dystonia risk loci; but conclusions have been limited by small sample sizes, partial coverage of genetic variants, or poor reproducibility. OBJECTIVE: To identify robust genetic variants and loci in a large multicenter cervical dystonia cohort using a genome-wide approach. METHODS: We performed a genome-wide association study using cervical dystonia samples from the Dystonia Coalition. Logistic and linear regressions, including age, sex, and population structure as covariates, were employed to assess variant- and gene-based genetic associations with disease status and age at onset. We also performed a replication study for an identified genome-wide significant signal. RESULTS: After quality control, 919 cervical dystonia patients compared with 1491 controls of European ancestry were included in the analyses. We identified one genome-wide significant variant (rs2219975, chromosome 3, upstream of COL8A1, P-value 3.04 × 10-8 ). The association was not replicated in a newly genotyped sample of 473 cervical dystonia cases and 481 controls. Gene-based analysis identified DENND1A to be significantly associated with cervical dystonia (P-value 1.23 × 10-6 ). One low-frequency variant was associated with lower age-at-onset (16.4 ± 2.9 years, P-value = 3.07 × 10-8 , minor allele frequency = 0.01), located within the GABBR2 gene on chromosome 9 (rs147331823). CONCLUSION: The genetic underpinnings of cervical dystonia are complex and likely consist of multiple distinct variants of small effect sizes. Larger sample sizes may be needed to provide sufficient statistical power to address the presumably multi-genic etiology of cervical dystonia. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Glycopyrrolate Improves Disability From Sialorrhea in Parkinson's Disease: A 12-Week Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the 12-week efficacy and safety of oral glycopyrrolate for moderate-to-severe sialorrhea in Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: Chronic moderate-to-severe sialorrhea has a negative impact on quality of life in PD. There is no robust evidence for oral treatments for sialorrhea longer than 1 week. METHODS: This was a 12-week, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel phase II study in patients with PD and Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale item 2.2 > 2. The intervention was glycopyrrolate up to 4.5 mg/d; the primary outcome was sialorrhea related-disability (Radboud Oral Motor Inventory for Parkinson's Disease-Saliva). We used an intention-to-treat analysis. A P < 0.05 was deemed significant. RESULTS: We recruited 28 patients (age, 71.1 ± 6.9 years; PD duration, 11.4 ± 7.2 years; Radboud Oral Motor Inventory for Parkinson's Disease-Saliva, 22.4 ± 5.7). Glycopyrrolate was superior to placebo at 12 weeks in the Radboud Oral Motor Inventory for Parkinson's Disease-Saliva (between-group difference, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-9.6). Dry mouth was the most common adverse event (glycopyrrolate, n = 6; placebo, n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: The results support the efficacy of glycopyrrolate to treat sialorrhea-related disability up to 12 weeks and contribute to addressing unmet nonmotor care needs in PD. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection has been associated with worse motor function in Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effects of HP eradication on PD symptoms. METHODS: In this parallel-group, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled, single-center trial, patients with PD with positive HP urea breath test and serology were block randomized (1:1) to receive standard eradication triple therapy or identically appearing placebo capsules for 1 week. Prespecified motor (International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Unified PD Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS], timed tests, and home-based wearable sensor measurements), nonmotor (Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire and Montreal Cognitive Assessment), and quality-of-life (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39) outcome measures were assessed at weeks 6, 12, 24, and 52. The primary outcome was the baseline-to-week 12 change in ON medication MDS-UPDRS motor scores. Lactulose-hydrogen breath testing for concomitant small intestinal bacterial overgrowth was performed at baseline and repeated at week 24, together with the urea breath test. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients were screened for eligibility and 80 were randomly assigned, of whom 67 were included in the full-analysis set (32 treatment group patients, 35 placebo patients). HP eradication did not improve MDS-UPDRS motor scores at week 12 (mean difference 2.6 points in favor of placebo, 95% confidence interval: -0.4 to 5.6, P = 0.089). There was no significant improvement in any motor, nonmotor, or quality-of-life outcome at weeks 12 and 52. Both the full-analysis and per-protocol analyses (based on eradication status) supported these conclusions. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth status did not influence treatment results. CONCLUSIONS: HP eradication does not improve clinical outcomes in PD, suggesting that there is no justification for routine HP screening or eradication with the goal of improving PD symptoms. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia: an update.

INTRODUCTION: Prolonged treatment with L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) leads to the development of uncontrolled movements (L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias (LID)) in Parkinson's disease (PD). There is currently only a single approved drug for the treatment of LID, a long-acting preparation of the NMDA antagonist, amantadine, that has variable benefits and side-effects. Therefore, new treatments for LID remain an unmet in PD. AREAS COVERED: We review the current strategies for the management of LID; the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the development of LID, which provides the rationale for clinical trials of novel targets for LID and provide a review of phase II/III trials for emerging drugs for LID, with either positive results, or ongoing studies, reported between January 2014 and December 2019. EXPERT OPINION: There are several ongoing studies for agents that showed possible benefit at phase Ib/IIa for reducing LID. However, there are no new positive phase III double-blind randomized controlled clinical trials (DBRCT) for emerging treatments for LID. Generating better preclinical models, more precise recruitment tools and better outcome measures remain a priority. The pharmacology of drugs investigated for LID may be too selective; therefore, evaluating combinations of drugs is worthy of consideration as is the repurposing of existing drugs with multiple pharmacological targets.

Viewpoint: Developing drugs for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in PD: Lessons learnt, what does the future hold?

The drive to develop drugs to treat PD starts and ends with the patient. Herein, we discuss how the experience with drug development for LID has led the field in translational studies in PD with advancing ground-breaking science via rigorous clinical trial design, to deliver clinical proof-of-concepts across multiple therapeutic targets. However, issues remain in advancing drugs efficacious preclinically to the clinic, and future studies need to learn from past successes and failures. Such lessons include implementing better early indicators of tolerability, for instance evaluating non-motor symptoms in preclinical models; improving patient-related outcome measures in clinical trials, as well as considering the unique nature of dyskinesia in an individual patient. The field of translational studies needs to become more patient focused to improve successful outcomes.

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson disease: Current and evolving concepts.

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia is a common complication in Parkinson disease. Pathogenic mechanisms include phasic stimulation of dopamine receptors, nonphysiological levodopa-to-dopamine conversion in serotonergic neurons, hyperactivity of corticostriatal glutamatergic transmission, and overstimulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on dopamine-releasing axons. Delay in initiating levodopa is no longer recommended, as dyskinesia development is a function of disease duration rather than cumulative levodopa exposure. We review current and in-development treatments for peak-dose dyskinesia but suggest that improvements in levodopa delivery alone may reduce its future prevalence. Ann Neurol 2018;84:797-811.

Update on treatments for nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease-an evidence-based medicine review.

OBJECTIVE: To update evidence-based medicine recommendations for treating nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Evidence-Based Medicine Committee's recommendations for treatments of PD were first published in 2002, updated in 2011, and now updated again through December 31, 2016. METHODS: Level I studies testing pharmacological, surgical, or nonpharmacological interventions for the treatment of nonmotor symptoms in PD were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion and quality scoring were as previously reported. The disorders covered were a range of neuropsychiatric symptoms, autonomic dysfunction, disorders of sleep and wakefulness, pain, fatigue, impaired olfaction, and ophthalmologic dysfunction. Clinical efficacy, implications for clinical practice, and safety conclusions are reported. RESULTS: A total of 37 new studies qualified for review. There were no randomized controlled trials that met inclusion criteria for the treatment of anxiety disorders, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, excessive sweating, impaired olfaction, or ophthalmologic dysfunction. We identified clinically useful or possibly useful interventions for the treatment of depression, apathy, impulse control and related disorders, dementia, psychosis, insomnia, daytime sleepiness, drooling, orthostatic hypotension, gastrointestinal dysfunction, urinary dysfunction, erectile dysfunction, fatigue, and pain. There were no clinically useful interventions identified to treat non-dementia-level cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base for treating a range of nonmotor symptoms in PD has grown substantially in recent years. However, treatment options overall remain limited given the high prevalence and adverse impact of these disorders, so the development and testing of new treatments for nonmotor symptoms in PD remains a top priority. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Pridopidine, a clinic-ready compound, reduces 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine-induced dyskinesia in Parkinsonian macaques.

BACKGROUND: Pridopidine, in development for Huntington's disease, may modulate aberrant l-dopa-induced effects including l-dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether pridopidine could reduce LID in the MPTP macaque model of Parkinson's disease and characterized the observed behavioral effects in terms of receptor occupancy. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic profile and effects of pridopidine (15-30 mg/kg) on parkinsonism, dyskinesia, and quality of on-time, in combination with l-dopa, were assessed in MPTP macaques with LID. Pridopidine receptor occupancy was estimated using known in vitro binding affinities to σ1 and dopamine D2 receptors, in vivo PET imaging, and pharmacokinetic profiling across different species. RESULTS: Pridopidine produced a dose-dependent reduction in dyskinesia (up to 71%, 30 mg/kg) and decreased the duration of on-time with disabling dyskinesia evoked by l-dopa by 37% (20 mg/kg) and 60% (30 mg/kg). Pridopidine did not compromise the anti-parkinsonian benefit of l-dopa. Plasma exposures following the ineffective dose (15 mg/kg) were associated with full σ1 occupancy (>80%), suggesting that σ1 engagement alone is unlikely to account for the antidyskinetic benefits of pridopidine. Exposures following effective doses (20-30 mg/kg), while providing full σ1 occupancy, provide only modest dopamine D2 occupancy (<40%). However, effective pridopidine doses clearly engage a range of receptors (including adrenergic-α2C , dopamine-D3 , and serotoninergic-5-HT1A sites) to a higher degree than D2 and might contribute to the antidyskinetic actions. CONCLUSIONS: In MPTP macaques, pridopidine produced a significant decrease in LID without compromising the antiparkinsonian benefit of l-dopa. Although the actions of pridopidine were associated with full σ1 occupancy, effective exposures are more likely associated with occupancy of additional, non-sigma receptors. This complex pharmacology may underlie the effectiveness of pridopidine against LID. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Responsiveness to Change of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-Mental State Examination, and SCOPA-Cog in Non-Demented Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Clinical monitoring of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) for cognitive decline is an important element of care. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been proposed to be a sensitive tool for assessing cognitive impairment in PD. The aim of our study was to compare the responsiveness of the MoCA to decline in cognition to the responsiveness of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Scales for Outcomes of Parkinson's disease-cognition (SCOPA-Cog). METHODS: PD patients without dementia were enrolled at 6 North American movement disorders centers between 2008 and 2011. Participants received annual evaluations including the MoCA, MMSE, and SCOPA-Cog followed by formal neuropsychological testing. The gold standard for change in cognition was defined as the change on the neuropsychological test scores over the annual assessments. The Reliable Change Method was used to provide an estimate of the probability that a given difference score would be obtained by chance. The sensitivity of the MoCA, MMSE, and SCOPA-Cog to change was quantified using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients were included in the analysis. Participants were followed at mean intervals of 11 ± 2 months for a median of 2 (maximum 5) visits. According to the reliable change index, 56 intervals of cognitive testing showed a decline in global cognition. ROC analysis of change in MoCA, MMSE, and SCOPA-Cog global scores compared to gold standard testing found an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.55 (95% CI 0.48-0.62), 0.56 (0.48-0.63), and 0.63 (0.55-0.70) respectively. There were no significant differences in the AUCs across the tests. The sensitivity of the MoCA, MMSE, and SCOPA-Cog to change at various thresholds for decline in scores reached a maximum of 71% for a cut-off of 1 point change on the SCOPA-Cog. CONCLUSION: Using neuropsychological testing as a gold standard comparator, the performance of the MoCA, MMSE, and SCOPA-Cog for detecting decline in non-demented PD patients over a 1-year interval is poor. This has implications for clinical practice; stable scores may not be taken as reassurance of the absence of cognitive decline.

Update in therapeutic strategies for Parkinson's disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent advances in therapeutics for motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Neuroprotection remains a large area of investigation with preliminary safety data on alpha synuclein immunotherapy and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists. Novel Monoamine Oxidase B and Caetchol-O-methyltransferase-inhibitors for motor fluctuations have shown benefit and are recently approved for clinical use. Long-acting amantadine has also been approved to reduce dyskinesia. Alternative delivery strategies (sublingual, inhaled) dopaminergics may prove useful for rapid reversal of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms. Advanced therapies (surgery and infusional therapies) continue to be useful in subgroups of patients for motor complications with improved safety and also benefit on some nonmotor symptoms, including neuropsychiatric issues. Specific therapeutics for cognition, swallowing, sleep, and mood disorders had moderate to limited benefits. Exercise-based therapy appears beneficial at all stages of Parkinson's disease. SUMMARY: The motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease can be reasonably treated and managed. However, therapies to slow or prevent disease progression remain a focus of research. Despite increased studies, treating nonmotor symptoms remains a challenge and an ongoing priority.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Correlation Analysis of Amantadine for Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia.

Dyskinesia is a common motor complication associated with the use of levodopa to treat Parkinson's disease. Numerous animal studies in mice, rats, and nonhuman primates have demonstrated that the N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist, amantadine, dose dependently reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). However, none of these studies characterized the amantadine plasma concentrations required for a therapeutic effect. This study evaluates the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship between amantadine plasma concentrations and antidyskinetic efficacy across multiple species to define optimal therapeutic dosing. The PK profile of amantadine was determined in mice, rats, and macaques. Efficacy data from the 6-hydroxydopamine rat and the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine macaque model of LID, along with previously published antidyskinetic efficacy data, were used to establish species-specific PK/PD relationships using a direct-effect maximum possible effect model. Results from the PK/PD model were compared with amantadine plasma concentrations and antidyskinetic effect in a phase 2 study in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with ADS-5102, an extended-release amantadine capsule formulation. Outcomes from each of the species evaluated indicate that the EC50 of amantadine for reducing dyskinesia range from 1025 to 1633 ng/ml (1367 ng/ml for an all-species model). These data are consistent with the mean amantadine plasma concentrations observed in patients with Parkinson's disease (∼1500 ng/ml) treated with ADS-5102 at doses that demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in dyskinesia. These results demonstrate that the EC50 of amantadine for reducing dyskinesia is consistent across multiple species and supports a plasma concentration target of ∼1400 ng/ml to achieve therapeutic efficacy.

International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence-based medicine review: Update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to update evidence-based medicine recommendations for treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: The Movement Disorder Society Evidence-Based Medicine Committee recommendations for treatments of PD were first published in 2002 and updated in 2011, and we continued the review to December 31, 2016. METHODS: Level I studies of interventions for motor symptoms were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion and quality scoring were as previously reported. Five clinical indications were considered, and conclusions regarding the implications for clinical practice are reported. RESULTS: A total of 143 new studies qualified. There are no clinically useful interventions to prevent/delay disease progression. For monotherapy of early PD, nonergot dopamine agonists, oral levodopa preparations, selegiline, and rasagiline are clinically useful. For adjunct therapy in early/stable PD, nonergot dopamine agonists, rasagiline, and zonisamide are clinically useful. For adjunct therapy in optimized PD for general or specific motor symptoms including gait, rivastigmine is possibly useful and physiotherapy is clinically useful; exercise-based movement strategy training and formalized patterned exercises are possibly useful. There are no new studies and no changes in the conclusions for the prevention/delay of motor complications. For treating motor fluctuations, most nonergot dopamine agonists, pergolide, levodopa ER, levodopa intestinal infusion, entacapone, opicapone, rasagiline, zonisamide, safinamide, and bilateral STN and GPi DBS are clinically useful. For dyskinesia, amantadine, clozapine, and bilateral STN DBS and GPi DBS are clinically useful. CONCLUSIONS: The options for treating PD symptoms continues to expand. These recommendations allow the treating physician to determine which intervention to recommend to an individual patient. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Botulinum Toxin Type A for Pain in Advanced Parkinson's Disease.

Background and Objective Pain is a frequent symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD), and the therapeutic alternatives are scarce. The goal of this trial was to measure the effects of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in the treatment of limb pain in advanced PD. Methods A randomized double-blind crossover versus placebo study of BTXA for limb pain in advanced Parkinson's disease was conducted. Subjects received individualized BTXA/placebo dosing per pain distribution in limbs. The primary outcome was a measure of change in global pain on a numeric rating scale (NRS) at 4 and 12 weeks postinjection and on a visual analogue scale 12 weeks after treatment. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of responders, physician-rated clinical global impressions, MDS-UPDRS and PDQ-39 scores, and adverse events. Results A total of 12 subjects completed the trial. Treatment with BTXA (average dose=241.66 U) produced a significant reduction in NRS score 4 weeks after the injections (-1.75 points, range from -3 to 7, p=0.033). However, there was no significant difference compared to placebo (p=0.70). Participants with dystonic pain showed a greater reduction in NRS score after 4 weeks when treated with BTXA (2.66 points vs. 0.75 for placebo). There were no significant differences for any of the secondary outcomes or significant adverse events. Conclusions Targeted BTXA injections were safe in patients with limb pain and advanced PD; however, the present study failed to show a significant effect when compared to placebo. Further studies may be focused on evaluating the effect of BTXA particularly in dystonic pain.

Vision-based assessment of parkinsonism and levodopa-induced dyskinesia with pose estimation.

BACKGROUND: Despite the effectiveness of levodopa for treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), prolonged usage leads to development of motor complications, most notably levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). Persons with PD and their physicians must regularly modify treatment regimens and timing for optimal relief of symptoms. While standardized clinical rating scales exist for assessing the severity of PD symptoms, they must be administered by a trained medical professional and are inherently subjective. Computer vision is an attractive, non-contact, potential solution for automated assessment of PD, made possible by recent advances in computational power and deep learning algorithms. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the feasibility of vision-based assessment of parkinsonism and LID using pose estimation. METHODS: Nine participants with PD and LID completed a levodopa infusion protocol, where symptoms were assessed at regular intervals using the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Movement trajectories of individual joints were extracted from videos of PD assessment using Convolutional Pose Machines, a pose estimation algorithm built with deep learning. Features of the movement trajectories (e.g. kinematic, frequency) were used to train random forests to detect and estimate the severity of parkinsonism and LID. Communication and drinking tasks were used to assess LID, while leg agility and toe tapping tasks were used to assess parkinsonism. Feature sets from tasks were also combined to predict total UDysRS and UPDRS Part III scores. RESULTS: For LID, the communication task yielded the best results (detection: AUC = 0.930, severity estimation: r = 0.661). For parkinsonism, leg agility had better results for severity estimation (r = 0.618), while toe tapping was better for detection (AUC = 0.773). UDysRS and UPDRS Part III scores were predicted with r = 0.741 and 0.530, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed system provides insight into the potential of computer vision and deep learning for clinical application in PD and demonstrates promising performance for the future translation of deep learning to PD clinical practices. Convenient and objective assessment of PD symptoms will facilitate more frequent touchpoints between patients and clinicians, leading to better tailoring of treatment and quality of care.

Trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine to treat levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Nondopaminergic pathways represent potential targets to treat levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD). This pilot-study (NCT01767129) examined the safety/efficacy of the sigma-1 receptor-agonist and glutamatergic/monoaminergic modulator, dextromethorphan plus quinidine (to inhibit rapid dextromethorphan metabolism), for treating levodopa-induced dyskinesia. METHODS: PD patients were randomized to dextromethorphan/quinidine (45 mg/10 mg twice daily)/placebo in two 2-week double-blind, crossover treatment periods, with intervening 2-week washout. After 14 days, a 2-hour intravenous levodopa-infusion was administered. Patient examinations were videotaped before infusion ("off" state) and every 30 minutes during and afterwards until patients returned to "off." The primary endpoint was dyskinesia-severity during infusion measured by Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale part 3 area-under-curve scores (blinded expert rated). Additional endpoints included other dyskinesia/motor assessments, global measures of clinical-change, and adverse-events. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were randomized and completed the study (efficacy-evaluable population). Dyskinesia-severity was nonsignificantly lower with dextromethorphan/quinidine than placebo during infusion (area-under-curve 966.5 vs 1048.8; P = .191 [efficacy-evaluable patients]), and significantly lower in a post-hoc sensitivity analysis of the per-protocol-population (efficacy-evaluable patients with ≥ 80% study-drug-compliance, n = 12) when measured from infusion start to 4-hours post-infusion completion (area-under-curve 1585.0 vs 1911.3; P = .024). Mean peak dyskinesia decreased significantly from infusion-start to return to "off" (13.3 vs 14.9; P = .018 [efficacy-evaluable patients]). A total of 9 patients rated dyskinesia "much/very much improved" on dextromethorphan/quinidine versus 1-patient on placebo. Dextromethorphan/quinidine did not worsen PD-motor scores, was generally well tolerated, and was associated with more frequent adverse events. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence of clinical benefit with dextromethorphan/quinidine for treating levodopa-induced dyskinesia in PD. Larger studies with a longer treatment duration need to corroborate these early findings. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Motor Complications of Dopaminergic Medications in Parkinson's Disease.

Motor complications are a consequence of the chronic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) and include motor fluctuations (wearing-off phenomenon) and levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Both can have a significant impact on functionality and quality of life; thus, proper recognition and management is essential. The phenomenology and temporal relationship of motor complications to the schedule of levodopa dosing can be helpful in characterizing them. There are several therapeutic approaches to motor complications, including pharmacological and surgical options. The authors summarize the different types of motor complications according to phenomenology and the currently available medical treatments, including ongoing trials for the management of this condition.

Integrating Patient Concerns into Parkinson's Disease Management.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex motor and non-motor disorder and management is often challenging. In this review, we explore emerging approaches to improve the care of patients, drawing from the literature regarding patient-centred care, patient and caregiver perspectives and priorities, gaps in knowledge among patients and caregivers and the need for accurate information, individual variability in disease manifestations, prognostication of disease course, new developments in health technologies and personalized medicine, specialty care, pharmacological and non-pharmacological management, financial burden, lifestyle and work-related issues, support groups and palliative care.