Malignant Neoplasms of the Penis with Radiologic and Pathologic Correlation.

Penile malignancy is the third most common male-specific genitourinary malignancy, with squamous cell carcinoma representing the most common histologic type. Squamous cell carcinoma is an epithelial malignancy, frequently developing from the mucosal surfaces of the foreskin, glans, and coronal sulcus and manifesting as a distal infiltrative or ulcerated mass. This typically occurs in men from the 6th to 8th decades of life, and risk factors include human papillomavirus, phimosis, presence of foreskin and poor hygiene, chronic inflammatory conditions such as lichen sclerosus, trauma, and smoking. Primary urethral malignancies including urothelial carcinoma and adenocarcinoma can occur but may lack this distal predilection. Sarcoma, melanoma, leukemia or lymphoma, and metastatic disease are less common sources of penile malignancy. Because of the sensitive nature of penile malignancies, there may be delays in seeking care and in subsequent diagnosis. Recently, the staging guidelines for penile cancer have been updated concurrently with a shift toward more penile-preserving therapies, which have led to a larger role of imaging in diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning for penile malignancies. A variety of imaging modalities may play a role in the identification and staging of penile malignancy, including an increased use of MRI for local staging of tumors, CT and PET/CT for identification of nodal and distant disease, and US for image-guided biopsy. The authors discuss an imaging approach to a spectrum of penile malignancies, with an emphasis on radiologic and pathologic correlation and how knowledge of normal tissue types and anatomic structures can aid in the diagnosis and staging of these tumors. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Spectrum of Coronary Artery Aneurysms: From the Radiologic Pathology Archives.

Advances in medical diagnosis reveal that coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) may develop in several clinical scenarios and manifest variable symptoms, imaging appearances, and outcomes. Aneurysms are pathologically classified into three groups: atherosclerotic, inflammatory, and noninflammatory. The last category is associated with congenital, inherited, and connective tissue disorders. Overlap exists among the groups, because secondary atherosclerotic change may be present in an aneurysm of any cause. Atherosclerosis is the most common cause of CAAs in adults, and inflammation is considered the underlying mechanism. In children, Kawasaki disease is the most likely cause of CAAs. In both conditions, the aneurysms are usually multiple and affect more than one coronary artery. Mycotic (infectious), iatrogenic, and cocaine-induced CAAs are also well documented. Most CAAs are discovered incidentally, but potential cardiovascular complications include thrombosis, occlusion, fistula formation, rupture, myocardial infarction, and cardiac tamponade. Imaging modalities to evaluate a suspected CAA include transthoracic echocardiography, angiographic cardiac catheterization, electrocardiographically gated computed tomographic angiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and MR angiography. Management is usually individualized, and options include surveillance, anticoagulant therapy, percutaneous stent or coil placement, surgical resection, and coronary artery bypass grafting.

Cardiac sarcoidosis: the challenge of radiologic-pathologic correlation: from the radiologic pathology archives.

Cardiac sarcoidosis is a rare but potentially fatal disorder with a nonspecific spectrum of clinical manifestations, including conduction disorders, congestive heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. Although early treatment to improve morbidity and mortality is desirable, sensitive and accurate detection of cardiac sarcoidosis remains a challenge. Except for the histopathologic finding of noncaseating granulomas in an endomyocardial biopsy specimen, most diagnostic tests are limited and nonspecific at best. Therefore, the decision to initiate treatment is based largely on the patient's clinical symptoms and the course of the disease, rather than histologic confirmation. Successful recognition of cardiac sarcoidosis ultimately requires rigorous collaboration among a clinician, radiologist, and pathologist. Advanced imaging modalities, such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose, have become increasingly useful in facilitating diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring, although limited prospective studies exist. This article describes the clinical parameters and pathologic findings of cardiac sarcoidosis and the advanced imaging features and differential diagnostic challenges that must be considered for a successful diagnostic approach. In addition, to improve the understanding of abnormalities detected with different imaging modalities, we suggest a unified terminology in describing radiologic findings related to cardiac sarcoidosis.

CT of acute perianal abscesses and infected fistulae: a pictorial essay.

Computed tomography (CT) is an effective, readily available diagnostic imaging tool for evaluation of the emergency room (ER) patients with the clinical suspicion of perianal abscess and/or infected fistulous tract (anorectal sepsis). These patients usually present with perineal pain, fever, and leukocytosis. The diagnosis can be easy if the fistulous tract or abscess is visible on inspection of the perianal skin. If the tract or abscess is deep, then the clinical diagnosis can be difficult. Also, the presence of complex tracts or supralevator extension of the infection cannot be judged by external examination alone. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the best imaging test to accurately detect fistulous tracts, especially when they are complex (Omally et al. in AJR 199:W43-W53, 2012). However, in the acute setting in the ER, this imaging modality is not always immediately available. Endorectal ultrasound has also been used to identify perianal abscesses, but this modality requires hands-on expertise and can have difficulty localizing the offending fistulous tract. It may also require the use of a rectal probe, which the patient may not be able to tolerate. Contrast-enhanced CT is a very useful tool to diagnose anorectal sepsis; however, this has not received much attention in the recent literature (Yousem et al. in Radiology 167(2):331-334, 1988) aside from a paper describing CT imaging following fistulography (Liang et al. in Clin Imaging 37(6):1069-1076, 2013). An infected fistula is indicated by a fluid-/air-filled soft tissue tract surrounded by inflammation. A well-defined round to oval-shaped fluid/air collection is indicative of an abscess. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of acute anorectal sepsis in the ER setting. We will discuss the CT appearance of infected fistulous tracts and abscesses and how CT imaging can guide the ER physician in the clinical management of these patients.

Aortic arch dissection: a controversy of classification.

Aortic dissections originating in the ascending aorta and descending aorta have been classified as type A and type B dissections, respectively. However, dissections with intimal flap extension into the aortic arch between the innominate and left subclavian arteries are not accounted for adequately in the widely used Stanford classification. This gap has been the subject of controversy in the medical and surgical literature, and there is a tendency among many radiologists to categorize such arch dissections as type A lesions, thus making them an indication for surgery. However, the radiologic perspective is not supported by either standard dissection classification or current clinical management. In this special report, the origin of dissection classification and its evolution into current radiologic interpretation and surgical practice are reviewed. The cause for the widespread misconception about classification and treatment algorithms is identified. Institutional review board approval and waiver of informed consent were obtained as part of this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study to assess all aortic dissection studies performed at the University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore between 2010 and 2012 to determine the prevalence of arch dissections. Finally, a unified classification system that reconciles imaging interpretation and management implementation is proposed.

From the radiologic pathology archives: cardiac lymphoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Lymphoma of the heart and pericardium is usually present as one aspect of disseminated disease and rarely occurs as a primary malignancy. It accounts for 1.3% of primary cardiac tumors and 0.5% of extranodal lymphomas. Cardiac lymphomas are most commonly diffuse large cell lymphomas and frequently manifest as an ill-defined, infiltrative mass. Atrial location is typical; the right atrium is most often affected. Pericardial thickening or effusion is often a common early feature of disease. Infiltration of atrial or ventricular walls with extension along epicardial surfaces is also a notable feature. At computed tomography, the attenuation of cardiac lymphoma may be similar to or lower than that of normal myocardium. At magnetic resonance imaging, it has variable signal intensity and contrast enhancement. Clinical manifestations may include pericardial effusion, cardiac arrhythmias, and a variety of nonspecific electrocardiographic abnormalities, notably first- to third-degree atrioventricular block. Treatment most commonly includes anthracycline-based chemotherapy and anti-CD20 treatment. Chemotherapy has been used alone or combined with radiation therapy. Palliative surgery has been performed, mainly for tumor debulking. The prognosis for patients with either primary or secondary lymphomatous heart involvement is usually poor; late diagnosis is one of the major factors affecting outcome.

Collaborative radiologic and histopathologic assessment of fibrotic lung disease.

The idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) are a seemingly disconnected collection of diseases usually associated with the presence of pulmonary fibrosis. Categorization of the IIPs continues to be problematic despite recent attempts to refine the diagnostic criteria and suggests that rather than separate diseases, these pneumonias represent a spectrum of injury and abnormal repair of the alveolar wall. Although the initiating injury or injuries are unknown, the IIPs share a restricted number of final common abnormal pathways that lead to volume loss and lung distortion. The pathways include (a) alveolar collapse, (b) incorporation of fibroblastic material into alveolar walls, and (c) cigarette smoke-related inflammation and fibrosis. A collaborative diagnostic process in which data from radiologic and histologic assessments are combined allows a more reliable identification of the predominant pathways leading to pulmonary fibrosis. This approach has implications for therapy and the future direction of research.