Association Between Surgical Opioid Prescriptions and Opioid Initiation by Opioid-naïve Spouses.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether surgical opioid prescriptions are associated with increased risk of opioid initiation by operative patients' spouses. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adverse effects of surgical opioids on operative patients have been well described. Whether risks of surgical opioids extend to operative patients' family members is unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of opioid-naïve, married patients undergoing 1 of 11 common surgeries from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2017. The adjusted association between surgical opioid prescriptions and opioid initiation by the operative patient's spouse in the 6-months after surgery was assessed. Secondary analyses assessed how this association varied with postoperative time. RESULTS: There were 318,022 patients (mean ± standard deviation age 48.8 ±9.3 years; 49.5% women). Among the 50,833 (16.0%) patients that did not fill a surgical opioid prescription, 2152 (4.2%) had spouses who filled an opioid prescription within 6-months of their surgery. In comparison, among the 267,189 (84.0%) patients who filled a surgical opioid prescription, 15,026 (5.6%) had spouses who filled opioid prescriptions within 6-months of their surgery [unadjusted P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-1.43, P < 0.001]. Associated risks were only mildly elevated in postoperative month 1 (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00-1.23, P = 0.04) before increasing to a peak in postoperative month 3 (aOR 1.57,95% CI 1.391.76, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical opioid prescriptions were associated with increased risk of opioid initiation by spouses of operative patients, suggesting that risks associated with surgical opioids may extend beyond the surgical patient. These findings may highlight the importance of preoperative counseling on safe opioid use, storage, and disposal for both patients and their partners.

Out-of-Network Facility Charges for Patients Undergoing Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of outpatient (OP) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is increasing. Although many arthroplasty surgeons and hospitals have longstanding agreements with insurance companies, it may take time for ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) to establish in-network agreements. The purposes of this study are to investigate trends in out-of-network facility charges for OP-TJA, as well as compare rates of out-of-network facilities between ASC and hospital outpatient department (HOPD) OP-TJA. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of the MarketScan commercial claims database of OP-TJAs (same-day discharge) performed at ASCs or HOPDs from 2007 to 2017. Detailed demographic, geographic, operative, insurance, temporal, and financial details were collected. Out-of-network facility utilization was trended over time. Adjusted regressions compared the prevalence of out-of-network facilities between ASCs and HOPDs. RESULTS: There were 13,031 OP-TJA patients (58.8% total knee arthroplasty). Utilization of out-of-network facilities significantly decreased over time, from 27.8% of surgeries in 2007 to 9.5% in 2017 (Ptrend < .001); however, this was non-linear with a significant increase in 2013-2015 corresponding to rising use of out-of-network ASCs. Patients treated at ASCs were significantly more likely to be out-of-network than those treated at HOPDs (odds ratio 4.88, 95% confidence interval 4.28-5.57, P < .001; odds ratio 7.70, 95% confidence interval 6.42-9.25, P < .001 among the 11,870 patients with in-network surgeons). About 10.4% of patients with in-network surgeons were treated at out-of-network facilities. CONCLUSION: Although the utilization of out-of-network facilities has decreased, over 10% of patients with in-network surgeons face out-of-network facility charges, which may often come as a surprise. Efforts are warranted to reduce the out-of-network facility burden for OP-TJA patients, including accelerating insurance contracting and reviewing patients' coverage statuses.

Combined Single-Shot Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee and Adductor Canal Block With Bupivacaine, Dexmedetomidine, and Dexamethasone for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Background: To investigate if combined single-shot adductor canal blockade (ACB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) provide better postoperative pain management compared to ACB alone for patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent primary, unilateral TKA. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts: single-shot ACB alone (performed with bupivacaine 0.25%) and combined single-shot ACB + IPACK (performed with bupivacaine 0.25%, dexmedetomidine 1 mg/kg, and dexamethasone 4 mg). Patients were propensity-matched 1:1. The primary study outcome was total opioid consumption converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per eight-hour interval and postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, length of stay, ambulation distance, return to emergency department, hospital readmission, and 30-day adverse events. Results: One hundred eighty patients were identified, of which propensity matching used 71% to yield 64 patients receiving ACB alone and 64 receiving combined ACB + IPACK. Combined ACB + IPACK had significantly lower total summative MME throughout the entire postoperative stay (P = .002) and cumulatively after the first 24 hours (P < .001). Combined ACB + IPACK also had lower mean pain scores for 0-8 hours (P = .005) and 8-16 hours (P = .009) postoperatively. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Combined single-shot ACB + IPACK block was associated with lower total narcotic intake and mean pain scores during most of the immediate postoperative period following primary, unilateral TKA compared to ACB alone. Implementing longer-acting, single-shot ACB + IPACK for TKA can balance effective and more selective pain management with early rehabilitation.

Modular Knee Arthrodesis as Definitive Treatment for Periprosthetic Infection, Bone Loss, and Failure of the Extensor Mechanism After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can result in bone and soft-tissue loss, leg length discrepancies, and dysfunctional extensor mechanisms. While above-knee amputation (AKA) is an established salvage treatment, modular knee arthrodesis (MKA) is a viable option that provides rigid stability and maintains leg length even in patients with severe bone and soft-tissue loss. We sought to report the outcomes of patients with an MKA as the definitive treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 8 patients implanted with an MKA at 2 institutions between 2016 and 2022. The mean age was 69.63 years, and 50.0% of patients were women. All patients were indicated for conversion to an MKA as the definitive treatment in the setting of treated chronic PJI after TKA, severe bone loss, and failure of the extensor mechanism not amenable to repair. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed. Results: No patients required incision and drainage or exchange of their MKA for PJI at mean 2-year follow-up. One patient required 2 revisions for mechanical failure of his implant at 5.0 and 6.4 years postoperatively. Conclusions: MKA is a viable permanent alternative to AKA for patients with treated chronic PJI and dysfunctional extensor mechanism after TKA. The procedure restores leg lengths in the setting of severe bone and soft-tissue loss, therefore allowing patients to ambulate independently. Still, surgeons should be aware of the potential for mechanical failure requiring revision.

Similar incidence of postoperative sciatic nerve palsy in direct anterior and posterior approach total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Sciatic nerve palsy is a rare but devastating complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). While the use of the direct anterior approach is increasing, limited data exist regarding sciatic nerve palsy and surgical approach. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors and outcomes associated with sciatic nerve palsy (SNP) after THA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed at a single institution of 7 SNP that occurred in 4045 THA via direct anterior approach and 10 SNP in 8854 THA via posterior approach, being operated between 01 January 2017 and 12 December 2021. SNP patients were matched 1:5 to patients without SNP. Medical records were reviewed for demographics including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and preoperative indication. Additional workup of SNP patients including advanced imaging and reoperation were documented. Recovery grades were assigned to all SNP patients at most recent clinical follow-up. RESULTS: 5 of the SNP were complete and 12 partial. They occurred as frequently with the direct anterior (0.17%) and posterior approach (0.11%, p = 0.5). The presence of femur cables and reoperations were associated with SNP (p = 0.04 and p = 0.002, respecitvely). Age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, and surgical indication had no effect on SNP. 4 of the 17 affected patients had almost complete recovery at latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of SNP was similar in direct anterior and posterior approach. Surgeons should counsel patients regarding the risks of SNP regardless of the used approach.

A Comparison of the Caprini Score With an Institutional Risk Assessment Tool for Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Joint Arthroplasty at an Urban Tertiary Care Health Safety Net Hospital.

Background: Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Prediction tools such as the Caprini Risk Assessment Model (RAM) have been developed to identify patients at higher risk. However, studies have reported heterogeneous results when assessing its efficacy for TJA. Patients treated in an urban health safety net hospital have increased medical complexity, advanced degenerative joint disease, and severe disability prior to TJA increasing the risk of VTE. We hypothesize that use of a tool designed to account for these conditions-the Boston Medical Center (BMC) VTE score-will more accurately predict VTE in this patient population. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was performed including subjects 18 years of age and older who underwent primary or revision TJA in an urban academic health safety net hospital. Patients with hemiarthroplasties, simultaneous bilateral TJA, and TJA after acute trauma were excluded. A total of 80 subjects were included: 40 who developed VTE after TJA (VTE+) and 40 who did not develop VTE (controls). Subjects were matched by age, gender, and surgical procedure. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the mean BMC VTE score for VTE+ and controls (4.40 and 3.13, respectively, P = .036). Conversely, there was no statistical difference between the mean Caprini scores for VTE+ and controls (9.50 and 9.35, respectively, P = .797). Conclusions: In a health safety-net patient population, an institutional RAM-the BMC VTE score-was found to be more predictive of VTE than the modified Caprini RAM following TJA. The BMC-VTE score should be externally validated to confirm its reliability in VTE prediction in similar patient populations.

Amyloidosis of the Femoral Neck: An Unusual Cause of Pathologic Fracture.

The deposition of amyloid within human tissue can be detrimental to the proper functioning of multiple organ systems. While the infiltration of the amyloid protein within the musculoskeletal soft tissues can lead to compressive neuropathies, tendon irritation or rupture, and joint stiffness, pathologic fracture as a result of amyloid deposition in bone is a rare manifestation of amyloidosis. We present a case of pathologic fracture of the femoral neck from amyloid deposition in a 59-year-old male on chronic hemodialysis who was found to have lytic lesions in his proximal femur. At the time of hemiarthroplasty, histopathologic analysis of a femoral head sample revealed apple-green birefringence of the deposits under polarized light, consistent with amyloid deposition. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for the atypical presentation of amyloidosis in a patient on chronic hemodialysis with lytic bone lesions.

Catastrophic Failure of the Tibial Component After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Fracture and Dissociation Between the Baseplate and Stem.

Fracture of the tibial component can be a devastating complication after primary total knee arthroplasty. While fractures of the tibial baseplate have been reported, failure at the junction between the baseplate and stem has not been well-described. We present a 49-year-old male who developed progressively worsening left knee pain and an effusion 7-8 years after an index total knee arthroplasty. Radiographs revealed component subsidence and subtle asymmetry between the baseplate and stem. At the time of revision, the tibial component was found to be fractured at the junction of the baseplate and stem, with complete dissociation between the two pieces. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for catastrophic failure, as this rare phenomenon can be subtle on radiographs and requires close monitoring for signs of component subsidence.

Reduced Narcotic Utilization in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients in an Urban Tertiary Care Center.

Background: Opioid use after total joint arthroplasty must be balanced against the risks of opioid dependence and diversion. This study sought to define the baseline patient characteristics and discharge opioid use after the initiation of a preoperative and postoperative institutional opioid prescription protocol in a population with a high prevalence of opioid dependence and substance use. Methods: Data on 1004 patients undergoing total joint arthroplasties from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics were collected, and data were grouped into high- and low-discharge opioid groups based on 1 standard deviation above or below the mean. Patient characteristics of the high and low groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance and Pearson chi-square test. Results: The prevalence of preoperative opioid dependence was 21.8%. The mean discharge opioid prescription was 264 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). The cutoffs of high- and low-use groups were above 424 MMEs and below 104.5 MMEs. The high-discharge opioid group was more likely to be male, younger, to have a history of preoperative opioid use, to undergo general anesthesia, and to be uninsured. The lower-discharge opioid group was more likely to be older, female, to have Medicare, and to stay approximately 1 day longer in the hospital. Body mass index, intraoperative opioid requirement, American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification score, race, total knee vs total hip arthroplasty, or surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty did not affect discharge opioid prescriptions. Conclusions: Reduction of opioid prescriptions at discharge in total joint arthroplasty patients may be possible with the use of preoperative and postoperative protocols, optimizing patient risk factors for opioid use and utilizing a patient-specific opioid taper regimen.

Comparing the Risk of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Following Intra-Articular Corticosteroid and Hyaluronic Acid Injections.

BACKGROUND: Although intra-articular corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are a cornerstone in the nonoperative management of hip pathology, recent reports have raised concerns that they may cause osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, these studies might have been limited by nonrepresentative patient samples. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of ONFH after CSI and compare it with the incidence in a similar patient population that received a non-CSI injection. METHODS: This was a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study of patients in the MarketScan database who underwent an intra-articular hip injection from 2007 to 2017. Patients receiving hip CSIs were matched 4:1 with patients receiving hip hyaluronic acid injections (HAIs) based on age, sex, geographic region, comorbidities, type of hip pathology, injection year, and baseline and follow-up time using propensity scores. The patients' first injections were identified, and the time to development of ONFH was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional-hazards models. Patients with a history of osteonecrosis or those who received both types of injections were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 3,710 patients undergoing intra-articular hip injection were included (2,968 CSIs and 742 HAIs; mean [standard deviation] age, 53.1 [9.2] years; 55.4% men). All baseline factors were successfully matched between the groups (all p > 0.57). The estimated cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of ONFH for CSI and HAI patients was 2.4% (1.8% to 3.1%) versus 2.1% (1.1% to 3.5%) at 1 year and 2.9% (2.2% to 3.7%) versus 3.0% (1.7% to 4.8%) at 2 years (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.84; p = 0.88). The results held across a range of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ONFH after intra-articular hip injection was similar between patients who received CSIs and those who received HAIs. Although this study could not determine whether intra-articular injections themselves (regardless of the drug that was used) lead to ONFH, the results suggest that ONFH after CSI often may be due, in part, to the natural course of the underlying disease. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively answer this question; in the interim, clinicians may be reassured that they may continue judicious use of CSIs as clinically indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Total Joint Arthroplasty in Homeless Patients at an Urban Safety Net Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Homelessness is a key social determinant of health, and the patient population has grown to over 580,000. Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an effective treatment of symptomatic end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip and knee and has been shown to improve health-related quality of life in the general population. However, the literature on the outcomes of TJA among homeless patients is limited. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 442 patients who underwent primary, unilateral TJA between June 1, 2016, and August 31, 2017, at an urban, tertiary, academic safety net hospital. Based on self-reported living status, we classified 28 homeless patients and 414 control nonhomeless patients. Fisher exact tests, Student t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression were used to compare the demographics, preoperative conditions, and surgical outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: The homeless group were younger, more often male, and smokers; had alcohol use disorder; and used illicit drugs. After controlling for age, sex, and preoperative medical and social conditions, homeless patients were 15.83 times more likely to have an emergency department visit (adjusted odds ratio, 15.83; 95% confidence interval, 5.05 to 49.59; P < 0.0001) within 90 days but had similar rates of readmission (P = 0.25), revision surgery (P = 0.38), and prosthetic joint infection (P = 0.25) when compared with nonhomeless patients. DISCUSSION: Although homeless patients did not have higher rates of readmission or revision surgery, homelessness still presents unique challenges for the TJA patients and providers. With careful preoperative optimization and collaborative support, however, the benefits of TJA may outweigh the risk of poor outcomes for these patients.

Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Reduces the Need for Manipulation Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Peripheral nerve blocks improve both pain control and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, few studies have examined the effects of different peripheral nerve block protocols on postoperative range of motion. The present study assessed the impact of a single-shot femoral nerve block (SFNB) versus continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) on postoperative range of motion and the need for subsequent manipulation following TKA. Methods: We retrospective reviewed patient charts to identify patients who had undergone primary elective unilateral TKA by 2 surgeons at a high-volume orthopaedic specialty hospital over a 3-year period. A total of 1,091 patients received either SFNB or CFNB and were included in the data analysis. Identical surgical techniques, postoperative oral analgesic regimens, and rehabilitation protocols were used for all patients. Patients with <90° of flexion at 6 weeks postoperatively underwent closed manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Results: Overall, 608 patients (55.7%) received CFNB and 483 patients (44.3%) received SFNB. Overall, 94 patients (8.6%) required postoperative manipulation for stiffness, including 36 (5.9%) in the CFNB group and 58 (12%) in the SFNB group. The 50% reduction in the need for manipulation in the CFNB group was independent of primary surgeon (p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of postoperative range of motion, either at the time of discharge or at 6 weeks postoperatively. A history of knee surgery, decreased preoperative range of motion, and decreased range of motion at the time of discharge were significantly associated with the need for further MUA (p = 0.0002, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions: Despite similar final postoperative range of motion between patients in both groups, our results suggest that CFNB may be superior to SFNB for reducing the need for postoperative manipulation after primary TKA. Furthermore, a history of ipsilateral knee surgery, decreased preoperative range of motion, and decreased range of motion at the time of discharge were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative stiffness requiring MUA after primary TKA. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Limb Lengthening after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Customized Patient-Specific Instrumentation Does Not Affect Expected Limb Lengthening.

INTRODUCTION: Expectations for limb length differences after TKA are important for patient perception and outcomes. Limb length discrepancies may occur due to postoperative leg length increases, which can lead to decreased patient functionality and satisfaction and even possible litigation. The purpose of this study is to examine the frequency and extent of limb lengthening among various preoperative deformities and between two different implant systems. METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative full-length standing radiographs were obtained between August 2018 and August 2019 to measure mechanical axis and limb length of operative limbs. Demographic information such as age, sex, and BMI was also collected. Patients were grouped into categories for pre- and postoperative subgroup analysis: valgus, varus, customized implant, and conventional implant. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate significant relationships. RESULTS: Of the 121 primary TKAs analyzed, 62% of the knees showed an increase in limb length after TKA, with an average lengthening of 5.32 mm. Preoperative varus alignment was associated with a mean lengthening of 3.14 mm, while preoperative valgus alignment was associated with a mean lengthening of 16.2 mm. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in limb lengths pre- and postoperatively (p = 0.23) and no significant changes in limb length for any subgroup. Further, no variables were associated with limb length changes (p = 0.49), including the use of customized implants (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Limb lengthening after TKA is common and, on average, occurs more significantly in valgus knees. No significant difference in limb lengthening could be demonstrated using customized over conventional implants. Preoperative counseling is important to manage patient expectations.

Image-Guided Intra-articular Hip Injections and Risk of Infection After Hip Arthroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Although intra-articular injections are important in the management of patients who may later undergo hip arthroscopy, conflicting data are available regarding the safety of such injections when administered within 3 months of surgery. Furthermore, despite the increasing use of image-guided intra-articular hip injections, it is unknown whether the type of imaging modality used is associated with infection after hip arthroscopy. PURPOSE: To assess the risk of infection associated with image-guided intra-articular injections before hip arthroscopy and, secondarily, compare that risk between ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopic (FL) guidance. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients in a large national insurance database who underwent hip arthroscopy between 2007 and 2017. Patients were required to have continuous enrollment from at least 1 year before to 6 months after hip arthroscopy. Patient age, sex, geographic region, medical history, surgical details, and hip injections were collected. Patients who underwent injection ≤3 months preoperatively and >3 to ≤12 months preoperatively were compared with patients who did not undergo preoperative injection. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the association between ipsilateral preoperative hip injection and surgical site infection within 6 months of surgery. RESULTS: We identified 17,987 patients (36.3% female; mean ± SD age, 37.6 ± 14.0 years) undergoing hip arthroscopy, 2276 (12.7%) of whom had an image-guided hip injection in the year preceding surgery (53.0% FL). Patients who underwent intra-articular injection ≤3 months preoperatively had similar infection rates to patients who did not undergo preoperative injection in the year before surgery for both the FL (0.46% vs 0.46%; P≥ .995) and the US cohorts (0.50% vs 0.46%; P = .76). Results persisted in adjusted analysis (FL ≤3 months: OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.32-3.37; P = .94; US ≤3 months: OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.36-3.90; P = .78). Similar results were seen for patients undergoing injections >3 to ≤12 months preoperatively. CONCLUSION: Postoperative infection was rare in patients undergoing intra-articular hip injection ≤3 months before hip arthroscopy and was no more common than in patients not undergoing preoperative injection. Moreover, no differences were seen in infection risk between US and FL guidance. Although intra-articular hip injections should always be administered with careful consideration, these results do not suggest that these injections are uniformly contraindicated in the 3 months preceding hip arthroscopy.

No Association Between Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices and Musculoskeletal Hip Joint Pain.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between intrauterine device (IUD) use and hip pain, orthopaedic visits for hip pain, and arthroscopic hip surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18-44 years old using either IUDs or subdermal implants for contraception in a large commercial claims database (MarketScan) from 2012 to 2015. All patients had at least 12 months of continuous enrollment both before and after contraceptive placement. Patients with a history of hip pain or surgery were excluded. The primary outcome was new hip pain. Secondary outcomes included visiting an orthopaedic or sports medicine provider for a hip complaint, intra-articular hip injection, and arthroscopic hip surgery. Outcomes were analyzed with Cox proportional-hazard models. RESULTS: We identified a total of 242,383 patients, including 216,541 (89.3%) with IUDs and 25,842 (10.7%) with subdermal contraceptive implants. In time-to-event analysis, IUDs (vs implants) were not associated with increased risk of new hip pain diagnoses (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.03, P = .21). In contrast, both age (P < .001) and region (P < .001) were associated with increased risk of new hip pain. Similar results were seen for the secondary outcomes, including risk of orthopaedic visits for hip complaints (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.83-1.35, P = .63), intra-articular injections of the hip (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.41, P = .77), and hip arthroscopy procedures (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.53-2.40, P = .75). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found no evidence that IUDs were associated with hip pain or surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort.

Opioid Use Following Inpatient Versus Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although the risks of continued opioid use following inpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have been well-studied, these risks in the outpatient setting are not well known. The purpose of the present study was to characterize opioid use following outpatient compared with inpatient TJA. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, opioid-naïve patients who underwent inpatient or outpatient (no overnight stay) primary, elective TJA from 2007 to 2017 were identified within a large national commercial-claims insurance database. For inclusion in the study, patients had to have been continuously enrolled in the database for ≥12 months prior to and ≥6 months after the TJA procedure. Multivariable analyses controlling for demographics, geography, procedure, year, and comorbidities were utilized to determine the association between surgical setting and risk of persistent opioid use, defined as the patient still filling new opioid prescriptions >90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: We identified a total of 92,506 opioid-naïve TJA patients, of whom 57,183 (61.8%) underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Overall, 7,342 patients (7.9%) underwent an outpatient TJA procedure, including 4,194 outpatient TKAs. Outpatient TJA was associated with reduced surgical opioid prescribing (78.9% compared with 87.6% for inpatient procedures; p < 0.001). Among the 80,393 patients (86.9%) who received surgical opioids, the total amount of opioids prescribed (in morphine milligram equivalents) was similar between inpatient (median, 750; interquartile range, 450 to 1,200) and outpatient procedures (median, 750; interquartile range, 450 to 1,140; p = 0.47); however, inpatient TJA patients were significantly more likely to still be taking opioids after 90 days postoperatively (11.4% compared with 9.0% for outpatient procedures; p < 0.001). These results persisted in adjusted analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.24; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient TJA patients who received opioid prescriptions were prescribed a similar amount of opioids as those undergoing inpatient TJA procedures, but were significantly less likely to become persistent opioid users, even when controlling for patient factors. Outpatient TJA, as compared with inpatient TJA, does not appear to be a risk factor for new opioid dependence, and these findings support the continued transition to the outpatient-TJA model for lower-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early Discharge After Total Hip Arthroplasty at an Urban Tertiary Care Safety Net Hospital: A 2-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown that shorter inpatient stays after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are safe and effective for select patient populations with limited medical comorbidity and perioperative risk. The purpose of our study was to compare the postoperative complications because they relate to the length of hospital stay at a safety net hospital in the urban area of the United States. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 236 patients who underwent primary THA in 2017 at an urban safety net hospital. We collected data on demographics, medical comorbidities, and surgical admission information. Patients were categorized as "early discharge" if they were discharged on postoperative day 0 to 1 and "standard discharge" if they were discharged on postoperative day 2 to 5. The outcomes of interest were 90-day and 2-year postoperative complications, emergency department visit, readmissions, and revision surgeries. Data were analyzed using t-test or chi-square test for univariate analysis and linear logistic regression for controlled analysis. RESULTS: Compared with the standard discharge group, there were markedly more male patients in the early discharge group (44.5% versus 80%). Early discharge patients were markedly younger (53.3 versus 59.5 years old), more likely to be White/non-Hispanic (64.4% versus 42.4%) and less likely to have heart disease and diabetes (2.2% versus 15.2% and 2.2% versus 19.9%, respectively). With adjustment for these potential confounders, no notable difference was observed in all-type complications, emergency department visits, readmission, or revision surgery between the two groups. DISCUSSION: This study confirmed that early discharge after THA is as safe as standard discharge in a safety net hospital with appropriate preoperative risk screening. Increased perioperative counseling and optimization of social and medical risk factors mitigated possible risk factors for increased length of stay and surgical complication.

Bias Does Not Exist in Treating Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Among Patients With Substance Use Disorder.

Debridement, antibiotics with implant retention (DAIR), and 2-stage revision are standard surgical interventions for treating knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Patients with substance use disorder (SUD), especially addictive drug use disorder (DUD), have been shown to receive inferior medical care in many specialties compared with nonusers. The authors identified patients with a diagnosis of PJI after knee arthroplasty who received either DAIR or 2-stage revision with the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2010 to 2014. Patients were stratified into 2 groups, patients with DUD and nonusers, based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, criteria. Descriptive analysis was conducted to show the national trend for knee PJI treatment among the 2 patient groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare the prevalence of DAIR and 2-stage revision between these 2 groups, adjusted for likely confounders, including age, sex, income, race, and comorbidities. Among the 11,331 patients with knee infection, 139 (1.23%) had DUD. Compared with nonusers, patients with DUD were significantly younger (P<.001), had more chronic conditions (P<.001), and were predominantly in lower income quartiles (P=.046). The 2 groups did not differ in sex and race (P=.072 and P=.091, respectively). The authors found that 30.22% of patients with DUD and 36.36% of nonusers received DAIR. The difference in these proportions was not statistically significant (P=.135). The results did not change after adjustment for confounding factors (P=.509). The findings suggested that bias does not exist among orthopedic surgeons who choose DAIR or 2-stage revision for knee PJI among patients with DUD. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):e385-e389.].

Surgical Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: A Brief Review.

Hip fracture is a cause for concern in the geriatric population. It is one of the leading causes of traumatic injury in this demographic and correlates to a higher risk of all-cause morbidity and mortality. The Garden classification of femoral neck fractures (FNF) dictates treatment via internal fixation or hip replacement, including hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. This review summarizes existing literature that has explored the difference in outcomes between internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty for nondisplaced and displaced FNF in the geriatric population, and more specifically highlights the risks and benefits of a cemented vs. uncemented approach to hemiarthroplasty.