RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This multi-site randomized trial evaluates the quality of life (QOL) benefits of an imagery-based group intervention titled 'Envision the Rhythms of Life'(ERL). METHODS: Breast cancer survivors >6 weeks post-treatment were randomized to attend five weekly 4-h group sessions at a community center with therapist present (live delivery (LD), n = 48), therapist streamed via telemedicine (telemedicine delivery (TD), n = 23), or to a waitlist control (WL) group (n = 47). Weekly individual phone calls to encourage at-home practice began at session one and continued until the 3-month follow-up. Seven self-report measures of QOL were examined at baseline, 1-month and 3-month post-treatments including health-related and breast cancer-specific QOL, fatigue, cognitive function, spirituality, distress, and sleep. RESULTS: The Bonferroni method was used to correct for multiple comparisons, and alpha was adjusted to 0.01. Linear multilevel modeling analyses revealed less fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and sleep disturbance for LD and TD compared with WL across the follow-up (p's < 0.01). Changes in fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, sleep disturbance, and health-related and breast cancer-related QOL were clinically significant. There were no differences between LD and TD. CONCLUSIONS: Both the live and telemedicine delivered ERL intervention resulted in improvements in multiple QOL domains for breast cancer survivors compared with WL. Further, there were no significant differences between LD and TD, suggesting telemedicine delivered ERL intervention may represent an effective and viable option for cancer survivors in remote areas.
Assuntos
Terapia Comportamental/métodos , Neoplasias da Mama/reabilitação , Disfunção Cognitiva/prevenção & controle , Imagens, Psicoterapia , Qualidade de Vida , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/prevenção & controle , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Telemedicina , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Fadiga/etiologia , Fadiga/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/etiologia , Espiritualidade , Listas de EsperaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare biologically targeted imagery (BTI) and critical thinking asthma management (CTAM) outcomes. DESIGN: Participants were randomized to BTI (group 1, G1) or CTAM (group 2, G2) in a 2 x 2 x 4 design (BTI/CTAM x pretest/post-test x weeks [3 week averaged intervals of symptoms and peak flows]). Interventions were asthma education plus treatment (BTI or CTAM for two 2-hour sessions per week for 6 weeks). For BTI, data collection (symptoms, lung function) occurred preintervention (3 week baseline), during the intervention (6 weeks), and postintervention (6 weeks). For CTAM, data collection occurred at wait-list control (WLC) (12 weeks extended baseline), preintervention (3 weeks), during the intervention (6 weeks), and postintervention (6 weeks). SETTING: Alaska Regional Hospital, Anchorage. SUBJECTS: Seventy (70) adults (53 women, 17 men) with asthma. INTERVENTIONS: WLC record keeping, BTI, or CTAM. OUTCOME MEASURES: Dependent variables included asthma symptoms (wheezing, coughing, sleep, activity, attacks, peak flow) and self-report assessments of Profiles of Mood States (POMS-BI) (anxiety, hostility, depression, uncertainty, fatigue, confusion); Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-Efficacy Asthma Questionnaire (KASE-AQ); Health Attribution Test (HAT) for locus of control (LoC); and the Revised Asthma Problem Behavior Checklist (RAPBC). RESULTS: Analyses of covariance with repeated measures contrasted BTI pre- to post-tests, time periods, and WLC; CTAM pre- to post-tests, time periods, and extended baseline WLC; and BTI to CTAM outcomes. WLC improved all POMS-BI scores except anxiety, increased internal LoC, and reduced problematic behaviors. Compared to WLC, BTI reduced wheezing, anxiety, and chance LoC, and increased asthma knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy. Compared to CTAM, BTI reduced wheezing and chance LoC, increased internal LoC, and improved 6 POMS-BI scores. Compared to extended baseline WLC, CTAM increased asthma knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy, internal LoC, and peak flow. CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions significantly improved symptoms and asthma management more than record keeping. Contrary to hypothesis, BTI produced better outcomes than CTAM.