c-Met+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Exhibit Enhanced Cytotoxicity in Mice and Humans In Vitro Tumor Models.

CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) play a crucial role in anti-tumor immunity. In a previous study, we identified a subset of murine effector CTLs expressing the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) receptor, c-Met (c-Met+ CTLs), that are endowed with enhanced cytolytic capacity. HGF directly inhibited the cytolytic function of c-Met+ CTLs, both in 2D in vitro assays and in vivo, leading to reduced T cell responses against metastatic melanoma. To further investigate the role of c-Met+ CTLs in a three-dimensional (3D) setting, we studied their function within B16 melanoma spheroids and examined the impact of cell-cell contact on the modulation of inhibitory checkpoint molecules' expression, such as KLRG1, PD-1, and CTLA-4. Additionally, we evaluated the cytolytic capacity of human CTL clones expressing c-Met (c-Met+) and compared it to c-Met- CTL clones. Our results indicated that, similar to their murine counterparts, c-Met+ human CTL clones exhibited increased cytolytic activity compared to c-Met- CTL clones, and this enhanced function was negatively regulated by the presence of HGF. Taken together, our findings highlight the potential of targeting the HGF/c-Met pathway to modulate CTL-mediated anti-tumor immunity. This research holds promise for developing strategies to enhance the effectiveness of CTL-based immunotherapies against cancer.

Cancer vaccines based on whole-tumor lysate or neoepitopes with validated HLA binding outperform those with predicted HLA-binding affinity.

Antigen selection and prioritization represent crucial determinants of vaccines' efficacy. Here, we compare two personalized dendritic cell-based vaccination strategies using whole-tumor lysate or neoantigens. Data in mouse and in cancer patients demonstrate that peptide vaccines using neoantigens predicted on the sole basis of in silico peptide-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) binding affinity underperform relative to whole-tumor-lysate vaccines. In contrast, effective in vitro peptide-MHC binding affinity and peptide immunogenicity significantly improve the prioritization of tumor-rejecting neoepitopes and result in more efficacious vaccines.

The current clinical landscape of personalized cancer vaccines.

Due to the intrinsic genetic instability of tumor cells, aberrant and novel tumor antigens can be expressed and serve as potential targets for cancer immunotherapy. This intrinsic feature can be exploited by cancer immunotherapy, particularly with cancer vaccination. Personalized cancer vaccination strategy can be a potent approach to trigger a broad-based antitumor response that is both beneficial and relevant to individual cancer patients. Also, cancer vaccination strategy can be designed to help elicit immunological memory for long-lasting tumor control. In this review, we describe the different types of personalized cancer vaccines and summarize the completed and ongoing cancer vaccination clinical trials in the last 10 years (database from www.clinicaltrials.gov). We also discuss the pros and cons of using different tumor animal models, i.e. syngeneic models, patient-derived xenografts models and genetically engineered mouse models, as tools for investigating cancer vaccination strategies. Finally, we describe preclinical studies that seek to test new emerging vaccination strategies as well as improving existing methods.