Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
2.
Pain Physician ; 10(2): 313-8, 2007 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17387354

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although in clinical use, there is only 1 published case report on the efficacy of intraarticular regeneration injection therapy (RIT) (a.k.a. prolotheraphy). This report supports a rationale for future clinical trials of this technique. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of intraarticular zygapophysial joint RIT in patients with chronic whiplash related neck pain that failed other conservative and interventional procedures. Patients were treated with intraarticular RIT and reassessed over 1 year. DESIGN: Retrospective case review of prospective data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients were treated with intraarticular prolotherapy by placing 0.5 - 1mL of 20% dextrose solution into each zygapophysial joint, after confirmation of intraarticular location with radiographic contrast, using 25-gauge spinal needles and fluoroscopic guidance. Solution was prepared by diluting D50W with 1% lidocaine. RESULTS: Fifteen patients completed treatment. Three patients had bilateral treatment, leaving 18 sides for analysis. Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI) pre-treatment was 24.71 and decreased post-treatment to 14.21 (2 months), 13.45 (6 months), 10.94 (12 months). Average change NDI=13.77 (p<0.0001) baseline versus 12 months. Symptoms for 14 patients were from motor vehicle accident, of which 13 were in litigation. Patients attending physiotherapy over the course of treatment had better outcomes than those without physiotherapy. Women needed more injections (5.4) than men (3.2) p=0.0003. CONCLUSION: Intraarticular RIT improved pain and function in this case series. The procedure appears safe, more effective than periarticular RIT, and lasted as long, or longer, than those patients with previous radiofrequency neurotomy. Concurrent physiotherapy helped reduce post-procedure neck stiffness. Future trials should consider gender when deciding how many treatments to administer. Litigation was not a barrier to recovery.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Glucose/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Manejo da Dor , Traumatismos em Chicotada/tratamento farmacológico , Articulação Zigapofisária/fisiologia , Adulto , Vértebras Cervicais , Doença Crônica , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Instabilidade Articular/tratamento farmacológico , Instabilidade Articular/etiologia , Instabilidade Articular/fisiopatologia , Ligamentos Articulares/efeitos dos fármacos , Ligamentos Articulares/fisiologia , Ligamentos Articulares/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pescoço/fisiopatologia , Dor/etiologia , Dor/fisiopatologia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Regeneração/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento , Traumatismos em Chicotada/complicações , Traumatismos em Chicotada/fisiopatologia , Articulação Zigapofisária/efeitos dos fármacos , Articulação Zigapofisária/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA