Race and Gender Shift among Academic Glaucoma Specialists in the Last 5 Decades.

Purpose: To evaluate the demographic composition of academic glaucoma specialists currently practicing in the United States. Design: Retrospective and observational study. Subjects: Academic glaucoma specialists identified from ophthalmology residency programs listed on the Doximity database. Methods: The American Board of Ophthalmology (ABO) membership directory, Doximity database, publicly available data, and direct communications were used to identify academic glaucoma specialists and their demographics. Information collected included-name, gender, race/ethnicity, geographic location, board certification date, academic affiliation, and academic rank. Ophthalmic age was defined as the number of years since ophthalmology board certification. Underrepresented minority (URM) groups were defined as Hispanics, Black or African Americans, Latinos, American Indians, or Alaskan Natives as defined by San Francisco match. In addition, the temporal, geographic, and academic rank distributions among females and URMs were explored. Main outcome measures: Women and URMs representations among academic glaucoma specialists across academic ranks, geographic regions, as well as ophthalmic age. Results: There were 457 active academic glaucoma specialists identified from 110 institutions in 38 states. Among them, 185 (40.5%) were women and 42 (9.2%) were URM. The proportion of women glaucoma specialists in academia had increased significantly with a rate of 1.049 in odds ratio (OR) per year (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant changes in the proportion of URMs over time. The earliest year of certification was 1,964 for males and 1,974 for females. When controlled for ophthalmic age, there were no significant differences in the distribution of women or URMs between the different academic ranks (p = 0.572 and p = 0.762, respectively). Among assistant professors, women had a significantly higher ophthalmic age compared to men (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in ophthalmic age in both the associate and full professor groups. There were no significant differences in the geographic distribution of gender (p = 0.516) and URM across United States regions (p = 0.238). Conclusion: The proportion of women among academic glaucoma specialists has significantly increased over the past 5 decades; however, the proportion of URMs has been stagnant in the same period. Enhancing URM representation among academic glaucoma specialists deserves to be a future priority. How to cite this article: Afzali K, Fujimoto DK, Mohammadi SO, et al. Race and Gender Shift among Academic Glaucoma Specialists in the Last 5 Decades. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(2):98-103.

Controversies in Lung Cancer: Heterogeneity in Treatment Recommendations for Stage III NSCLC According to Disease Burden and Oncogenic Driver Alterations.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic options for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consist of definitive chemoradiation, surgery combined with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy, and trimodality therapy. More recently, biologically driven systemic therapy options, including immunotherapy and targeted therapy, have become increasingly available. METHODS: A customized, case-based survey was designed and distributed to members of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) to determine practice habits and preferences for NSCLC patients with stage III disease and N2 to N3 nodal involvement. RESULTS: Data were compiled from 87 respondents from 31 countries, including medical oncologists (49%), surgical oncologists (24%), and radiation oncologists (21%). Definitive chemoradiation was more likely to be recommended for stage IIIC (98.2%) or stage IIIB (75.8%) scenarios compared with stage IIIA (59.6%) without actionable driver alterations (P < .0001 and .0003, respectively); and chemoradiation was more likely for stage IIIB (57.7%) compared to stage IIIA (39.9%) with actionable EGFR/ALK alterations (P = .008). Surgery was more likely to be recommended in the presence of an actionable alteration (38.7% vs. 19%, P < .0001). Surgeons were more likely than medical oncologists to recommend surgical approaches in scenarios without actionable alterations (25.6% vs. 11.2%, P < .0001) or with actionable alterations (57.5% vs. 31.1%, P = .0001). DISCUSSION: The dominant recommended strategy for stage III NSCLC was chemoradiation, although respondents were more likely to recommend surgical approaches in the presence of actionable alterations. Despite the lack of reported clinical trial data, many IASLC lung cancer experts favored targeted therapy when actionable driver alterations were present.

Improving gynecologic brachytherapy patient experience by optimizing MRI, anesthesia, and scheduling to decrease the length of time tandem and ovoid applicators are in place.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy requires multiple different steps and plays a critical role in treatment for gynecological cancer. In an effort to improve gynecologic patient experience, we investigated how different aspects of the procedure influence how long the patient has the brachytherapy applicator in place. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We prospectively recorded 145 consecutive tandem and ovoid treatments for 33 patients and determined how anesthesia vs. conscious sedation, MRI or not, and the number of procedures in the day impact applicator in time. The data were analyzed in a mixed effects linear regression model to account for the within-patient correlation. RESULTS: We found average applicator in place time was 179 minutes (range: 87-311 minutes). Patients who received anesthesia had a significant increase in length of applicator in patient time by an average of 42 minutes compared with those who received conscious sedation. Undergoing an MRI increased length of applicator in time by an average of 66 minutes, although the actual MRI performed generally took less than 30 minutes. Having three or more procedures scheduled for 1 day increased the length of time the tandem and ovoid was inserted by an average of 35 minutes. CONCLUSION: The use of anesthesia vs. conscious sedation, MRI scans for treatment planning, and number of procedures scheduled per day have significant influence on the duration of brachytherapy treatments. This information can help us work to optimize scheduling and thereby improve patient brachytherapy experience.

Improving brachytherapy efficiency with dedicated dosimetrist planners.

PURPOSE: To investigate the different factors affecting the procedure duration for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We prospectively recorded 86 consecutive vaginal cylinder (VC) treatments and 82 tandem and ovoid treatments. Key time points in the brachytherapy process, identity of the planner and checker, number of treatments per day, and fraction number per patient were recorded. The data were analyzed in a mixed effects linear regression model to account for the within patient correlation. Post hoc pair-wise comparisons were performed using a Dunnett's adjustment for comparisons to a single control group and using a Tukey adjustment for all pair-wise comparisons. RESULTS: We focused on several key time intervals in the treatment: total, nursing/anesthesia preprocedure, procedure, contouring, and planning times. In analysis, multiple factors significantly influenced VC timing but not tandem and ovoid timing. The planners were separated and analyzed based on experience and profession. Inexperienced physicists planning times were on average 18 min (p = 0.0010) and 14 min (p = 0.0038) slower than dedicated brachytherapy dosimetrist and experienced physicists, respectively. An increase in the number of procedures for the day of treatment increased the VC total time (p = 0.0218). The VC procedure time changed depending on whether it was the patients' first, second, or third VC treatment (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of dosimetrists as dedicated planners for brachytherapy is more cost and time efficient. There are multiple variables affecting brachytherapy treatment with actionable opportunities to improve procedure scheduling.

Newly diagnosed glioblastoma: adverse socioeconomic factors correlate with delay in radiotherapy initiation and worse overall survival.

The optimal time for starting radiation in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate postoperative radiotherapy treatment patterns and the impact of timing of radiotherapy on survival outcomes in patients with GBM using a large, national hospital-based registry in the era of Stupp chemoradiation. We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Data Base and identified adults with GBM diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 and treated with chemoradiation. We classified time from surgery/biopsy to radiation start into the following categories: <15 days, 15-21 days, 22-28 days, 29-35 days, 36-42 days and >42 days. We assessed the relation between time to radiation start and survival using Cox proportional hazards modeling adjusting for clinically relevant variables that were selected a priori. We used multivariate logistic modeling to determine factors independently associated with receipt of delayed radiation treatment. A total of 12 738 patients met our inclusion criteria after our cohort selection process. The majority of patients underwent either gross total (n = 5270, 41%) or subtotal (n = 4700, 37%) resection, while 2768 patients (22%) underwent biopsy only. Median time from definitive surgery or biopsy to initiation of radiation was 29 days (interquartile range 24-36 days). For patients who had biopsy or subtotal resection, earlier initiation of radiation did not appear to be associated with improved survival. However, among patients who underwent gross total resection, there appeared to be improved survival with early initiation of radiation. Patients who initiated radiation within 15-21 days of gross total resection had improved survival (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.98, P = 0.03) compared with patients who had delayed (>42 days after surgery) radiation. There was also a trend (P = 0.07 to 0.12) for improved survival for patients who initiated radiation within 22-35 days of gross total resection compared with patients who had delayed radiation. Patients who were black, had Medicaid or other government insurance or were not insured, and who lived in metropolitan areas or further away from the treating facility had higher odds of receiving radiation >35 days after gross total resection. Patients who lived in higher income areas had higher odds of receiving radiation within 35 days of a gross total resection. In a large cohort of patients with GBM treated with chemoradiation, our data suggest a survival benefit in initiating radiotherapy within 35 days after gross total resection. Further research is warranted to understand barriers to timely access to optimal therapy.