Tissue damage between barbed suture and conventional sutures in animal laboratory model using scanning electron microscopy.

This study aimed to compare the tissue damage caused by barbed sutures and conventional sutures using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Porcine myocardium was incised and sutured using different thread types: barbed suture, (STRATAFIX® Spiral PDS PLUS) and conventional sutures, (VICRYL® and PDS Plus®). Needle hole shapes were examined at magnifications of 30×-100×. VICRYL® suture damaged the tissue and created large gaps around the needle holes. The tissue around the needle holes was smoother and less damaged in the single suture ligations with PDS®; however, a large gap had formed. In the continuous suture with STRATAFIX®, the tissue around the needle holes was significantly smoother and minimally damaged, with no noticeable gaps around the needle holes. Barbed sutures reduced the load on needle holes and minimised tissue damage owing to the dispersion of traction forces by the barbs compared with conventional sutures.

Oncofertility-related psycho-educational therapy for young adult patients with breast cancer and their partners: Randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A couples' psycho-educational program called Oncofertility! Psycho-Education and Couple Enrichment (O!PEACE) therapy was created and its effect when provided before cancer treatment was examined. METHODS: This multicenter randomized controlled trial with nonmasking, parallel two-group comparison enrolled women aged 20 to 39 years with early-stage breast cancer and their partners. They were randomly assigned to receive O!PEACE (37 couples) or usual care (37 couples). Primary end points were cancer-related posttraumatic stress symptoms, symptoms of depression, and anxiety. Secondary end points were stress-coping strategies, resilience, and marital relationship. RESULTS: Women receiving psycho-educational therapy had significantly reduced Impact of Event Scale-revised version for Japanese scores (p = .011, ηp 2  =  = .089). For patients with Impact of Event Scale-revised version for Japanese scores at baseline ≥18.27, O!PEACE therapy improved these scores when compared with usual care (U = 172.80, p = .027, r = 0.258). A >5-point reduction was present in 59.3% and 30% of women in the O!PEACE therapy and usual-care groups, respectively. For partners, O!PEACE therapy significantly improved stress-coping strategies (95% CI, -0.60 to -0.05; p = .018, ηp 2  =  = .074) and escape-avoidance marital communication (95% CI, -0.33 to -0.08; p = .001, ηp 2  = .136). O!PEACE therapy significantly improved the partners' support (95% CI, 0.10-0.50; p = .001, ηp 2  = .127), the rate of receiving fertility preservation consultations, and knowledge levels. CONCLUSIONS: O!PEACE therapy before cancer treatment can improve posttraumatic stress symptoms, stress-coping behavior, and marital relationships. Larger sample sizes and longer term follow-up are required. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: A psycho-educational program, the Oncofertility! Psycho-Education and Couple Enrichment (O!PEACE) therapy program was developed and evaluated for women diagnosed with breast cancer and their partners. A multicenter randomized controlled trial showed that the O!PEACE psycho-educational therapy, with only two precancer treatment sessions, can reduce cancer-related posttraumatic stress symptoms and improve oncofertility knowledge and marital relationships in young adult patients with breast cancer. The therapy could also improve stress-coping strategies in marital communications with their partners. Couples may use O!PEACE psycho-educational therapy to consider fertility preservation and improve their psychosocial aspects.

Effect of a web-based fertility preservation training program for medical professionals in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Our web-based training program called "Educating Medical Professionals about Reproductive Issues in Cancer Healthcare" aims to help healthcare professionals communicate promptly with patients and survivors who are adolescents and young adults, with information pertinent to reproductive health issues such as the risk of infertility and fertility preservation. METHODS: The study participants were professional healthcare providers, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, social workers, midwives, psychologists, laboratory technicians, genetic counselors, and dieticians. Pre- and post- and 3-month follow-up tests consisting of 41 questions were administered to measure changes in knowledge and confidence. The participants also received a follow-up survey that covered confidence, communication techniques, and practice habits. A total of 820 healthcare providers participated in this program. RESULTS: The mean total score from the pre-test to the post-test grew significantly (p < 0.01), and participants' self-confidence increased. In addition, there was a change in the behavior of healthcare providers, who began asking about patients' marital status and parity. CONCLUSION: Our web-based fertility preservation training program improved knowledge and self-confidence regarding fertility preservation issues among healthcare providers caring for adolescents and young adult cancer patients and survivors.

[Qualitative Equalization and Sustainability of Decision Support Functions for AYA Patients in Oncofertility Networks- Initiatives of the Oncofertility Consortium Japan].

Starting from 2021, public subsidies for fertility preservation for CAYA cancer patients have been initiated, and from 2022, there is also public support for assisted reproductive technology(ART)after cancer treatment. On the other hand, regarding fertility preservation therapy, it's not universally beneficial for all cancer patients, and evidence regarding its outcomes and safety from both reproductive medicine and the perspective of the primary condition's treatment is still insufficient. As a result, the"public subsidy system"is being implemented as being coupling with to build evidence through close collaboration between the primary disease treatment and reproductive medical care, focusing on providing information and decision- making support. In response to these developments, the 4th Basic Plan for Promoting Cancer Control and the criteria for designating cancer care collaborative hospitals, among other things, mention the necessity of establishing regional networks for cancer and reproductive medical care and the need to participate in such networks. In this article, we discuss the fundamentals of cancer and reproductive medical care, along with the challenges they present. We emphasize the importance of transitioning from information provision to decision-making support and delve into the current status and issues surrounding the establishment of cancer and reproductive medical care networks. Furthermore, we address the efforts of the Japan Society of Cancer and Reproductive Medicine in resolving these issues and advancing the field.

A comparative analysis of MRI findings in endometrial cancer: differentiation between endometrioid adenocarcinoma, serous carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of endometrial cancers and to reveal the differences between endometrioid carcinoma (EC), serous carcinoma (SC), and clear cell carcinoma (CCC). METHODS: In this study, 274 consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed endometrial cancer (231 ECs, 25 SCs, and 18 CCCs) who underwent MRI before hysterectomy were enrolled. MRI images were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the three pathologies. RESULTS: The maximum diameters (55.6 ± 34.7 vs. 39.3 ± 21.6 vs. 39.4 ± 26.8 mm) (p < 0.05) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (1.11 ± 0.21 vs. 0.84 ± 0.17 vs. 0.86 ± 0.16 × 10-3 mm2/s) (p < 0.01) were significantly greater in CCCs than in ECs and SCs, respectively. Infiltrative growth pattern (33% vs. 6%) (p < 0.01) was more frequent in CCCs than in ECs. Peritoneal dissemination (16% vs. 0%) (p < 0.01) and heterogeneous signal on diffusion-weighted (61% vs. 32%) (p < 0.05) images were more frequent in SCs than in ECs, respectively. Abnormal ascites (12% vs. 11% vs. 0%) and heterogeneous signal on T1-weighted (28% vs. 50% vs. 9%), T2-weighted (64% vs. 72% vs. 36%), and fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (80% vs. 90% vs. 46%) images were more frequent in SCs and CCCs than in ECs, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SCs frequently exhibited a heterogeneous signal with peritoneal dissemination and abnormal ascites. Alternatively, CCCs tended to have a larger tumor size and higher ADC values with an infiltrative growth pattern, heterogeneous signal, and abnormal ascites. KEY POINTS: • SCs tend to have a heterogeneous signal intensity with peritoneal dissemination and abnormal ascites compared to ECs. • CCCs tend to have a heterogeneous signal intensity with an infiltrative growth pattern and abnormal ascites compared to ECs. • CCCs have a larger tumor size and higher ADC values compared to ECs and SCs.

Indications for fertility preservation not included in the 2017 Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline for Fertility Preservation in Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Patients treated with gonadal toxicity, including benign diseases.

In recent years, local governments in Japan have established a public financial support system for fertility preservation in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer patients. Fertility preservation has become popular for patients with cancers included in the gonadal toxicity risk classification of the 2017 edition of the Guideline for Fertility Preservation in Children, Adolescents and Young Adult Cancer Patients from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology. However, patients with cancer and non-cancer diseases that are not included in the Guideline's gonadal toxicity risk classification also often receive treatment that may affect fertility, but they are often denied the opportunity of fertility preservation because no public financial support is available for diseases not listed in the Guideline. The national research project proposes including these diseases in the indications and treatment for fertility preservation. Therefore, we cooperated with the Japan Society for Fertility Preservation and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare research group to solicit opinions from experts in each therapeutic area and reviewed the literature and overseas guidelines. This paper summarizes the findings of the project. We believe that it will be an important source of information for clinicians treating patients who need fertility preservation but note that the appropriateness of fertility preservation for the disorders listed in this report needs to be continuously reviewed as medical care advances.

Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017 for fertility preservation in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer patients: part 2.

The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) published the "JSCO Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017 for Fertility Preservation in Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Patients" in 2017. This was the first guideline in cancer reproductive medicine in Japan. In the field of cancer reproductive medicine, close cooperation between an oncologist and a physician for reproductive medicine is important from before treatment initiation until long after treatment. The guideline takes into consideration disease specificity and provides opinions from the perspective of oncologists and specialists in reproductive medicine that are in line with the current state of the Japanese medical system. It is intended to serve as a reference for medical staff in both fields regarding the availability of fertility preservation therapy before the start of cancer treatment. Appropriate use of this guideline makes it easier to determine whether fertility preservation therapy is feasible and, ultimately, to improve survivorship in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer patients. In this article (Part 2), we describe details by organ/system and also for pediatric cancer.

Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017 for fertility preservation in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer patients: part 1.

In 2017, the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) published the JSCO Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017 for Fertility Preservation in Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Patients. These were the first Japanese guidelines to address issues of oncofertility. In this field of medicine, sustained close cooperation between oncologists and reproductive specialists is essential from the diagnosis of cancer until many years after completion of cancer treatment. These JSCO guidelines were intended to guide multidisciplinary medical staff in considering the availability of fertility preservation options and to help them decide whether to provide fertility preservation to childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer patients before treatment starts, with the ultimate goal of improving patient survivorship. The guidelines are presented as Parts 1 and 2. This article (Part 1) summarizes the goals of the guidelines and the methods used to develop them and provides an overview of fertility preservation across all oncology areas. It includes general remarks on the basic concepts surrounding fertility preservation and explanations of the impacts of cancer treatment on gonadal function by sex and treatment modality and of the options for protecting/preserving gonadal function and makes recommendations based on 4 clinical questions. Part 2 of these guidelines provides specific recommendations on fertility preservation in 8 types of cancer (gynecologic, breast, urologic, pediatric, hematologic, bone and soft tissue, brain, and digestive).

A practical survey of fertility-preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan.

AIM: The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions. METHODS: This study was conducted as "Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016" which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40-41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44-45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities.

The possible effects of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017 on the practice of fertility preservation in female cancer patients in Japan.

Purpose: In 2017, the first guidelines for fertility preservation in cancer patients were published in Japan. However, the impact of the guidelines remains unknown. Therefore, the authors conducted a nationwide survey on cryopreservation procedures in the period from shortly before to after publication of the guidelines (2016-2019) and compared the results with our previous survey (2011-2015). The authors also surveyed reproductive specialists' awareness of the guidelines and implementation problems. Methods: The authors sent a questionnaire to 618 assisted reproductive technology facilities certified by the Japanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Results: The authors received responses from 395 institutions (63.8%). Among them, 144 institutions conducted cryopreservation for cancer patients (vs. 126 in 2011-2015) and performed 2537 embryo or oocyte and 178 ovarian tissue cryopreservation procedures (vs. 1085 and 122, respectively). Compared with the previous period, indications were more varied and protocols for controlled ovarian stimulation were more standardized. Reproductive specialists' interest in oncofertility was high, but many reported three main difficulties: selecting a treatment method, storing samples in the long term, and securing the necessary human resources. Conclusions: The practice of fertility preservation in cancer patients in Japan has been considerably affected by the first Japanese guidelines.

Association between postpartum depression and social support satisfaction levels at four months after childbirth.

This study clarifies the association between postpartum depression (PPD) and satisfaction with social support after childbirth through an anonymous survey of 427 postpartum mothers. Mothers' PPD was found to be significantly associated with satisfaction levels regarding formal-instrumental support (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.162-0.632), informal-instrumental support (OR: 0.547, 95% CI: 0.313-0.955), and informal-psychological support (OR: 0.591, 95% CI: 0.384-0.912) in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. To prevent PPD, specialists as formal support providers must provide qualified care based on comprehensive judgments, and families as informal support providers should help with childcare, housework, and mental support.

[Promotion of Equal Access to Medical Services for Children, Adolescent and Young Adult(CAYA)Cancer Patients with Reproductive Problems-A Nationwide Expansion of the Regional Oncofertility Network in Japan].

OBJECTIVES: Fertility preservation is important for Children, Adolescent and Young Adult(CAYA)cancer patients. Although a regional oncofertility network was established in Japan in 2012, regional inequality persists. This study was aimed at expanding the oncofertility network throughout Japan. METHODS: Oncologists, reproductive medicine specialists, and administrative officials from 24 regions, currently without a regional oncofertility network, conferred to discuss problems and strategies for network expansion. RESULTS: Regional oncofertility networks had already been established in 4 of 24 regions. Consultation and support and a collaboration system between facilities and individual doctors were found in 13 and 14 regions, respectively. Regarding which organization should lead the network operation, the regions(number)chose the prefecture (10), prefectural cancer centers(10), and OB/GYN department of hospitals specializing in cancer treatment(9). Obstacles to establishing a regional oncofertility network were the lack of manpower(21), budget(19), know-how(16), and specialists( 12). DISCUSSION: CAYA cancer patients need equal access to oncofertility networks, and a public support system is essential for preserving the fertility of cancer patients. We should organize a oncofertility network in association with prefectural administration. Medical staff training and supply of materials using the Oncofertility Consortium Japan system are required to promote the oncofertility network throughout Japan.

Fertility preservation in adolescent and young adult cancer patients: From a part of a national survey on oncofertility in Japan.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the current status of reproductive disorders and provision of information on oncofertility to female adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients in Japan. METHODS: A national survey of AYA cancer survivors was conducted. Children were <15 years old, and AYAs were 15-39 years old. Results from the survivors of other than gynecological disease who underwent chemotherapy were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the survivors, 41.4% were concerned about their reproductive function and infertility, and 36.2% were aware of menstrual cycle abnormalities. Among them, 15.5% (n = 20) of all and 21.2% (n = 17) of the AYA-onset survivors suffered infertility due to chemo- or radiotherapy and gave up childbearing. These rates were significantly higher than those of healthy AYAs. Although 80.8% of AYA-onset survivors answered that they had received information on reproductive function and infertility, only 55.8% had received information on fertility preservation methods. Furthermore, only 22.4% of all and 42.3% of AYA-onset survivors had received pretreatment information on fertility preservation methods. CONCLUSIONS: Not a few AYA cancer survivors reported reproductive dysfunction. These findings indicate that information provided on therapy-related problems before cancer treatment in Japan was insufficient and highlight the need to improve patient decision-making and support systems for fertility preservation.

Problems of reproductive function in survivors of childhood- and adolescent and young adult-onset cancer revealed in a part of a national survey of Japan.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the current status of reproductive disorders as long-term complications in adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients by comparing survivors of childhood-onset with those of AYA-onset cancer in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a national survey of AYA cancer survivors and healthy AYAs and analyzed the results from survivors who underwent chemotherapy and reported fertility problems as their current concern. RESULTS: Among all of the childhood-onset survivors, 27 (35.5%; nine males [28.1%] and 18 females [40.9%]) listed reproduction fertility problems as their current concern. Among all AYA-onset survivors, 25 (69.5%; 1/4 males [25.0%] and 24/32 females [75.0%]) listed these problems as a current concern. In contrast, 96.3% (26/27) of all childhood-onset cancer survivors and 68.0% (17/25) of all AYA-onset cancer survivors who received chemotherapy listed these problems as a current concern. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable number of both childhood-onset and AYA-onset cancer survivors, and especially those who had undergone chemotherapy, reported reproductive dysfunction as a delayed complication. It is vitally important to establish a supportive care system both for the patients whose fertility was abolished after the completion of cancer treatment and prophylactically for patients before they begin treatment.

The evaluation of frequency of nephrotoxicity caused by liposomal amphotericin B.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) was developed to reduce nephrotoxicity and maximize the therapeutic utility of amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. However, there is little investigation into the safety of L-AmB in patients with several renal functions. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the clinical safety of L-AmB among patients with several renal functions. METHODS: We divided patients treated with L-AmB from April 2014 to September 2016 into 4 groups (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)≥60, 60 > eGFR≥30, eGFR<30 and hemodialysis). The main endpoint was the incidence of nephrotoxicity and the difference in the serum creatinine values at the end of L-AmB treatment as compared with baseline. RESULTS: The incidence of nephrotoxicity was not significantly different among four groups (eGFR≥60; 27.0%, 60 > eGFR≥30; 30.8%, eGFR<30; 50.0%, hemodialysis; 40.0%, p = 0.56).Only one group of patients with eGFR≥60 admitted the significant increase of serum creatinine value after L-AmB treatment started (p < 0.01). Patients admitted 0.5 mg/dL or more of increase in serum creatinine values until 9 days from the L-AmB therapy started (eGFR≥60; 5.0 days [3.0-8.0 days], 60 > eGFR≥30; 5.0 days [4.0-9.0 days], eGFR<30; 4.5 days [3.0-5.0 days], hemodialysis; 5.5 days [4.0-7.0 days], p = 0.46). CONCLUSION: Take previous clinical study results together, our data suggested that L-AmB is safer agent than amphotericin B for the treatment of fungal infections in patients with eGFR<60 and hemodialysis patients at the start of treatment. Also, especially, we should use L-AmB more carefully until 9 days from the treatment started.

Frequency of Treponema pallidum invasion into cerebrospinal fluid in primary or secondary early-stage syphilis.

Frequency of Treponema pallidum invasion into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has not been clear at this present. Since it is impossible to culture T. pallidum in vitro at this present, we need molecular based-approach to detect it in CSF. Additionally, neurosyphilis is usually a late sequela, however it might result in asymptomatic neurosyphilis even at primary or secondary syphilis. This study was to reveal the frequency of T. pallidum invasion into CSF especially at primary or secondary syphilis with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. All patients were visited the Aichi Medical University Hospital or Izumi ladies' clinic between 2016 and 2017. Clinical CSF samples were collected from patients with early and late stages of syphilis. The PCR was done using primers targeting the tpN47gene. CSF samples were collected from 9 patients (4 patients with primary syphilis, 3 with secondary syphilis, and 1 early latent syphilis and 1 with late latent syphilis). PCR showed positive reaction in 2 of 7 (28.6%) primary and secondary syphilis patients, in 1 of 1 (100%) early latent syphilis patients, and in 1 of 1 (100%) late latent syphilis patients. Despite its lack of sensitivity for use alone as a diagnostic test, this PCR test should be preferred for the diagnosis of neurosyphilis. Because, T. pallidum was detected in the 28.6% CSF of patients at primary and secondary syphilis, which indicated that they invade the central nervous system from the early stages of infection. However, studies in a larger population are required to confirm these preliminary results.

Correction to: Current situation of cancer among adolescents and young adults in Japan.

In the original publication, Tables 4 and 5 have not been published in a readable format. The corrected clear version is given in this Correction.

Current situation of cancer among adolescents and young adults in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is rare among adolescents and young adults (AYA). Affected persons need generation-specific attention and care; however, no nationwide study has investigated the medical care structure for AYA cancer treatment in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide survey of AYA cancer for frequency of AYA patients, type of cancer, medical facilities, and certified cancer professionals. Data were collected from 14,713 patients at 218 Core Cancer Treatment Hospitals. RESULTS: The average proportion of AYA cancer patients to all cancer patients was 3.6%. The median number of patients aged 15 to 24 years per hospital was small (n = 5, range 1-51). The most frequent primary site of AYA cancer was the cervix uteri, but when cancer in situ was excluded, the hematopoietic malignancies were the most frequent cancer in males and females aged 15-24 years. In the age group 25-39 years, testicular and breast cancers were the most frequent cancers in males and females, respectively. Certified cancer professionals and facilities are necessary for appropriate care of AYA cancer patients, but the availability of such professionals varied greatly among hospitals. Hospitals with few AYA cancer patients were less likely to employ such physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that medical care for AYA cancer in Japan requires further refinement and a multidisciplinary approach.

Examining Japanese women's preferences for a new style of postnatal care facility and its attributes.

Perinatal care in rural Japan is currently facing a crisis because of the lack of medical staff, especially obstetricians. In this study, a new style of postnatal care facility that combines both medical and nonmedical support is considered. Contrary to most postnatal care facilities in Japan, this new postnatal care facility accepts a puerperant from the cooperating maternity facility soon after birth (≤2 days). We conducted a hypothetical choice experiment to investigate whether this new postnatal care facility could be accepted by women in Gero City, Hida, Gifu Prefecture and how these women evaluate different kinds of postnatal care services. The results show that after a 2-day hospital stay, women from Gero City preferred to move to the new postnatal care facility over the other alternatives (continued hospitalization or discharge home). In addition, the estimated choice probabilities for selecting the postnatal care facility under different scenarios show a high level of acceptance for this new postnatal care facility.

[Current Status of Oncofertility in Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Generation Cancer Patients in Japan - National Survey of Oncologists].

A national survey conducted in 2016 aimed to evaluate the current status and needs of the field of oncofertility and to consider optimized medical delivery systems. A total of 739 oncologists, excluding gynecological and urological specialists, were surveyed. Of these, 99.2% thought that providing information on fertility preservation was important. Of the surveyed oncologists, 48% were affiliated with facilities providing assisted reproductive technology, and 79.3% practiced in university hospitals. Of 238 (32.2%) specialists who provided information on the risk of reproductive damage resulting from treatment in their facility, 163 (44.9%) and 75 (19.9%) practiced in university hospitals (n=363) and non-university hospitals (n= 376), respectively. In contrast, 14.3% and 32.7% of oncologists who practiced in university hospitals and non-university hospitals, respectively, collaborated with local obstetricians and gynecologists. Among oncologists who use a gradually expanding regional oncofertility network, 0.6% practice in university hospitals and 2.7% practice in non-university hospitals. Patients were advised that the risk of infertility was 92.3% and the likelihood of fertility preservation was 66.9%. Furthermore, as an ideal way of providing information on preservation of fertility, 22.9% of oncologists collaborate with local gynecologists, and 26.3% do so at a public cancer and reproductive medical counseling center. In addition, 34.7% and 55.1% of oncologists at university and non-university hospitals, respectively, thought that implementation of a fertility preservation program at a public facility would be desirable. Although most oncologists recognize the importance of providing information on reproductive medicine, the support system for reproductive function and fertility in adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation cancer patients is limited because of the lack of agreement on patient referral. The limited number of referrals in turn limits data collection in the field of oncofertility. Grant: A Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant: H27-Cancer Control-Ippan.