The usefulness of the maximum Hounsfield units (HU) in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome for ureteral stones and the proposal of novel indicators using the maximum HU.

Computed tomography (CT) attenuation value of ureteral stones is one of the predictors of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) outcome. It is common to use the mean Hounsfield units (HU) to describe the CT attenuation value. However, an observer bias can occur when measuring the mean HU in the conventional method. On the other hand, our way to obtain only the maximum HU is simpler and less biased. We retrospectively evaluated 464 patients with ureteral stones who underwent SWL and compared predictive accuracy of various factors including maximum and mean HU. Results were determined after a single SWL. Predictors of SWL success were examined by the statistical analysis of successful and failed groups. 324 of the 464 patients who underwent SWL were stone-free after a single SWL. Significant differences were found in factors related to CT attenuation value and stone size. As a result of receiver operating characteristic analysis, it was found that maximum HU and mean HU, major diameter and volume have equivalent prediction accuracy, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that maximum HU and major diameter were included in independent predictors. We also examined the new original indicators using maximum HU and major diameter. Stone-resistant probability obtained from the logistic model and Maximum HU and Major diameter Index obtained by multiplying maximum HU by major diameter were useful for predicting SWL success, respectively. In conclusion, maximum HU and mean HU have equivalent predictive accuracy, and maximum HU is easier to measure and less biased than mean HU.

Localization of islet-cell hyperplasia: value of pre- and intraoperative arterial stimulation and venous sampling.

Arterial stimulation and venous sampling was effective in the localization of Beta-cell hyperplasia of the pancreas in the islets of Langerhans in an 84-year-old woman. The patient presented with repeated episodes of unconsciousness and hypoglycemia. She was first suspected of having insulinoma, but diagnostic imaging failed to reveal any tumors. Arterial stimulation and venous sampling (ASVS) and percutaneous transhepatic portal venous sampling (PTPS) were performed to localize the tumor. By ASVS, increases in immuno reactive insulin (IRI) were noted in renal vein blood samples (because a splenorenal shunt was present) after splenic arterial stimulation and venous sampling, and PTPS revealed a stepup in IRI from splenic venous blood samples. Preoperative diagnosis suggested Beta-cell hyperplasia in the pancreas tail. Intraoperative ultrasound failed to find a tumor. Intraoperative ASVS showed the site of increase IRI as the pancreas tail, so distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy were performed. However, hypoglycemia was observed constantly after this operation. Relaparotomy, causing additional resection, was conducted to confirm the precise location and to remove the residual Beta-cell hyperplasia of the pancreas. At the second resection, the existing part of Beta-cell hyperplasia was confirmed through intraoperative ASVS, and additional resection of the pancreas body and neck was performed. At this time, complete removal of the residual Beta-cell hyperplasia was confirmed through ASVS. The hypoglycemia and impaired consciousness disappeared after the operation, and the patient's blood sugar level was maintained at a normal level. Pathological findings revealed islets of Langerhans hyperplasia extending to 1 cm in the pancreas tail region. We conclude that pre- and intraoperative ASVS is a useful test for Beta-cell hyperplasia, which is difficult to diagnose through ordinary imaging techniques.