Weight affects survival of primary total knee arthroplasty: study based on the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register with 67,810 patients and a median follow-up time of 5 years.

Background and purpose - Obesity is a rising issue worldwide and growing evidence supports poor outcome amongst obese patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Using nationwide registries we investigated the association between bodyweight and risk of revision of primary TKA. Patients and methods - All primary TKA performed during 1997-2015, weight at time of primary TKA and subsequent TKA revisions were identified in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register (DKR). Data on comorbidities and a priori selected confounding variables were collected from nationwide registries. The association between weight and 1st time TKA revision was calculated as both crude and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Cox regression. Results - Of 67,810 identified primary TKAs, 4.8% were revised within a median follow-up time of 5.4 years. No association between weight and risk of any revision in patients aged 18-54 and 55-70 years was found. Increased risk of any revision was seen in patients >70 years, 80-89 kg (aHR =1.5, CI 1.2-1.8), 90-99 kg (aHR =1.7, CI 1.3-2.1) and patients >99 kg (aHR =1.6, CI 1.3-2.1), as well as those weighing 45-60 kg (aHR =1.4, CI 1.1-1.9) compared with same aged patients weighing 70-79 kg. Interpretation - We found a complex association between weight and knee arthroplasty survival. There was an increased risk of any revision in patients older than 70 years of age weighing <60 kg and >80 kg. Patients aged 18-55 years weighing 60-69 kg had a lower risk of revision compared with all other weight groups, whereas weight was not found to affect risk of any revision in patients aged 55-70 years.

Cementless metaphyseal sleeves without stem in revision total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cementless metaphyseal sleeve is suggested to be used without stem in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). To the best of our knowledge, no papers investigating this have been published. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome. METHOD: In this retrospective study, 71 patients operated with rTKA with sleeves without stem in the period 2009-2011 were identified; 63 were examined. All patients with the prosthesis still in place were invited to a medical examination including X-rays. American Knee Society Score (AKSS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were used as primary clinical outcome scores. RESULTS: Mean number of revisions including the revision with sleeve was 1.7. AKSS increased significantly from 62.7 to 109.6; (p value <0.0001). The overall satisfaction was 2.5 on a four-stage scale, going from very satisfied to dissatisfied (range 1-4). The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification showed 63 % of the tibias and 56 % of the femurs to be type 2B, whereas 19 % tibias and 5 % femurs were type 3. Review of the X-rays showed all prostheses fixed. Mean tibiofemoral alignment was 6.0° valgus, and 51 % were outside optimal alignment (2.4°-7.2°). Six patients were excluded from the study. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the prostheses were overall well fixed and patients' AKSS increased significantly. Many patients had pain conditions, both comorbid pain and pain that might be alignment-related, and adding a stem thus seems to be a good idea in terms of alignment. Level of evidence Level IV, case series without control group.

Diaphyseal forearm fractures in children.

Diaphyseal forearm fractures in children are common and knowledge of both ordinary and rare variations of these are important to deliver the best treatment as presented in this review. Closed reduction and cast immobilisation are effective and well-documented treatments for most fractures. Fractures which cannot be sufficiently treated in a cast are stabilised with elastic stable intramedullary nailing which is an effective treatment with a low complication rate. The focus in reduction is to correct alignment, displacement, and rotation to restore normal function of the forearm.