Placental function and fetal weight are associated with maternal hemodynamic indices in uncomplicated pregnancies at 35-37 weeks of gestation.

BACKGROUND: Over the years, there has been an increasing interest in the assessment of maternal hemodynamic responses during pregnancy. With the use of both noninvasive devices and/or maternal echocardiography, it has been shown that mothers who have pregnancy complications have altered hemodynamics compared with those who have uncomplicated pregnancies. It also has been suggested that preexisting maternal cardiac changes might drive the development of complications in pregnancy that are associated with impaired placentation. To understand, however, this potential link in complicated pregnancies, it is important to clarify whether placental function is associated with maternal cardiac functional indices in normal pregnancies. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether placental function, perfusion, and fetal weight are associated with maternal cardiac hemodynamic responses at 35-36 weeks of gestation in normal pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective screening of women attending Kings' College Hospital for routine hospital visit at 35-37 weeks' gestation. We recorded maternal characteristics and measured mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, sonographic estimated fetal weight, and serum placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1. We also performed maternal echocardiogram to assess cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance as well as indices of diastolic and systolic function, including global longitudinal systolic function and left ventricular mass indexed to body surface area. RESULTS: We studied 1386 women. Maternal characteristics were associated with both maternal hemodynamics and functional and structural indices. Uterine artery pulsatility index was associated with left ventricular mass (P=.03) and global longitudinal systolic function (P=.017). There were significant nonlinear associations between placental growth factor and cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance (P<.001 for both) and between soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and peripheral vascular resistance (P=.018). Estimated fetal weight was associated with maternal cardiac output (mean increase=0.186, 95% confidence interval, 0.133-0.238, P<.001) and peripheral vascular resistance (mean decrease=-0.164, 95% confidence interval, -0.217 to -0.111, P<.001). No association was noted between placental and fetal parameters and maternal cardiac functional and structural indices. In multivariable analysis, placental growth factor remained strongly associated with maternal cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance (P=.002 for both) over and above maternal characteristics and estimated fetal weight. Estimated fetal weight was associated with left ventricular mass (0.102, 95% confidence interval, 0.044-0.162, P=.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest a strong link between maternal hemodynamic responses and fetoplacental needs across the whole spectrum in normal pregnancies. These findings would also indicate that to diagnose maternal cardiac dysfunction in pregnancies complicated by impaired placentation a more extensive echocardiographic assessment might be needed rather than relying on hemodynamics which are strongly associated with fetoplacental indices.

First-trimester screening-biomarkers and cell-free DNA.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of cell-free DNA into clinical practice has changed the screening approach. Healthcare professionals and future parents tend to overestimate NIPT (noninvasive prenatal testing) capabilities despite its relatively high cost and limited information. OBJECTIVE: In this review, our aim was to survey how various countries have introduced contingent screening models and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the combined screening test and the use of NIPT. DATA SOURCE: The Web of Science, PubMed database and institutional websites were searched for information regarding screening approaches and the implementation in different countries. RESULTS: There are nine countries and regions that have already approved contingent screening test, while others (e.g. Australia) are discussing the implementation of contingent screening versus universal use of NIPT. There are several recent meta-analyses debating whether to use NIPT for universal screening for trisomies and other fetal conditions. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT is a reasonable option as an advanced screening test for trisomy 21, 18 and 13 only. Introducing screening by NIPT instead of a first-trimester screening will cause the loss of other valuable information including accurate dating of pregnancy, diagnosing major structural fetal abnormalities and multiple pregnancies at an early gestational age. Additionally, the opportunity to screen for early preeclampsia will be lost. Currently, the price for NIPT is still high adding extra strain on publicly funded health systems.

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing beyond Trisomies.

The last decade has seen incredible advances in the genetic era, in next-generation sequencing of cell-free DNA in the maternal plasma, detecting abnormal fetal chromosomes. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has showed increased sensitivity and specificity for Down syndrome superior to any other screening test. Technical advances have made possible the detection of other conditions which does not necessarily mean clinical benefit for the patient. Private laboratories have added multiple conditions in the panel of NIPT, but some of these abnormalities are so rare, that their prevalence is not even clear. Data regarding clinical performance of extended NIPT is lacking. Implementation of such a test has to be carefully weighed, and not only the benefits but also the harm should be taken into account.