Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Electrocardiol ; 75: 1-9, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36272350

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The electrocardiography (ECG) has short-term prognostic value in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet its ability to predict long-term mortality is unknown. This study aimed to elucidate the predictive role of initial ECG on long-term all-cause mortality in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, adults with COVID-19 who underwent ECG testing within a 17-hospital health system in Northeast Ohio and Florida between 03/2020-06/2020 were identified. An expert ECG reader analyzed all studies blinded to patient status. The associations of ECG characteristics with long-term all-cause mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression model and multivariable logistic regression models, respectively. Status of long-term mortality was adjudicated on 01/07/2022. RESULTS: Of 837 patients (median age 65 years, 51% female, 44% Black), 683 (81.6%) were hospitalized, 281 (33.6%) required ICU admission, 67 (8.0%) died in-hospital, and 206 (24.6%) died at final follow-up after a median (IQR) of 21 (9-103) days after ECG. Overall, 179 (20.7%) patients presented with sinus tachycardia, 12 (1.4%) with atrial flutter, and 45 (5.4%) with atrial fibrillation (AF). After multivariable adjustment, sinus tachycardia (E-value for HR=3.09, lower CI=2.2) and AF (E-value for HR=3.13, lower CI=2.03) each independently predicted all-cause mortality. At final follow-up, patients with AF had 64.5% probability of death compared with 20.5% for those with normal sinus rhythm (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Sinus tachycardia and AF on initial ECG strongly predict long-term all-cause mortality in COVID-19. The ECG can serve as a powerful long-term prognostic tool in COVID-19.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Masculino , Eletrocardiografia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Taquicardia Sinusal , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico
2.
Respiration ; 84(2): 123-7, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22699227

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The steady rise in the number of critically ill patients in the USA has led to an increase in the need for tracheostomies in patients requiring chronic ventilatory support. There is a matched need for experienced operators to safely and efficiently perform these procedures. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effects on procedural outcomes and efficiency of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) placement in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) by the surgical team (ST) or interventional pulmonologists (IP). The IP team joined the PDT team in September 2007 and became primarily responsible for all PDT in the MICU. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who received PDT in the MICU by ST and IP from September 2007 to August 2010 was made. Outcomes including safety, efficacy, and procedural efficiency were compared. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients underwent bedside PDT in the MICU during this period. Forty-three procedures (40.2%) were performed by the ST and 64 procedures (59.8%) were performed by IP. There was no statistical difference between the incidence of airway injury and infection between the two procedural groups. There were no deaths related to the performance of PDT in our series. PDT was completed within 48 h of request in 100% of IP patients and 95% of ST patients (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistical differences in PDT between the ST and IP groups when comparing complications. There was a trend towards an increased efficiency in time to PDT after consultation within the IP PDT group. Trained IP can safely and effectively perform PDT.


Assuntos
Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Pneumologia , Cirurgia Torácica , Traqueostomia , Estado Terminal/terapia , Dilatação/efeitos adversos , Dilatação/métodos , Dilatação/normas , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Assistência de Longa Duração/métodos , Segurança do Paciente , Pneumologia/métodos , Pneumologia/normas , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Cirurgia Torácica/métodos , Cirurgia Torácica/normas , Traqueostomia/efeitos adversos , Traqueostomia/métodos , Traqueostomia/normas , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 11(12): 906-915, 2022 Dec 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36173893

RESUMO

AIM: Limited information is available about the short- and long-term outcomes in electrical storm (ES)-induced cardiogenic shock (CS) and its predictors. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective, single-centre cohort study of consecutive patients with ES admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit between 2015 and 2020. The proportion of ES patients who developed CS was adjudicated, and clinical predictors of in-hospital ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-related mortality and 1-year all-cause mortality were investigated. Of the 214 patients with ES, 33.6% developed CS. Left-ventricular ejection fraction, admission lactate, absence of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and admission central venous pressure were independently associated with development of CS (P < 0.03 for all). Based on these variables, a FLIC score was developed (https://riskcalc.org/FLICscore/) to predict ES-induced CS [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.949, with AUC = 0.954 in a validation cohort, both P < 0.001]. Patients who developed CS had a 11.3-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-12.8] increased odds for in-hospital VA-related mortality and 9.4-fold (95% CI 4.0-22.4) increased odds for in-hospital all-cause mortality. A FLIC score above 0.62 was associated with a 6.2- and 5.8-fold increased odds for respectively similar endpoints. Patients with ES-induced CS received more treatment modalities to manage the ES (4.5 ± 1.8 vs. 2.3 ± 1.2, P < 0.001) and had longer length of stay [14 (8-27) vs. 8 (5-13), P < 0.001] than patients without CS. Interestingly, if patients with ES-induced CS survived to discharge, their outcomes were similar to those without CS at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Cardiogenic shock in ES is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication with high short-term mortality. A novel risk score could identify patient at risk, generating a potential for early risk-based interventions.


Assuntos
Choque Cardiogênico , Taquicardia Ventricular , Humanos , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Taquicardia Ventricular/etiologia , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Arritmias Cardíacas , Mortalidade Hospitalar
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA