Diagnostic Accuracy of the Proton Pump Inhibitor Test in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Noncardiac Chest Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Response to a trial of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is currently accepted as a first step in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, information on the diagnostic performance of the PPI test is limited. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the PPI test in GERD and noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) and to assess the test performance in erosive reflux disease (ERD) and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). METHODS: Web of Science, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and MEDLINE were searched for studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of the PPI test in adult patients with typical GERD and NCCP who underwent evaluation using an accepted reference standard, from January 1, 1950, through February 1, 2021. Subgroup analyses were performed, and the risk of bias was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (GERD=11, NCCP=8) involving 1691 patients were included. In GERD, the PPI test had 79% pooled sensitivity [95% confidence interval (CI), 72%-84%], and 45% pooled specificity (95% CI, 40%-49%). In NCCP, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 79% (95% CI, 69%-86%) and 79% (95% CI, 69%-86%), respectively. In ERD, the PPI test had 76% pooled sensitivity (95% CI, 66%-84%) and 30% pooled specificity (95% CI, 8%-67%). In NERD, the PPI test had 79% pooled sensitivity (95% CI, 70%-86%) and 50% pooled specificity (95% CI, 39%-61%). CONCLUSIONS: The PPI test was sensitive in GERD but with suboptimal specificity. The test performed better in GERD-related NCCP. Diagnostic accuracy was comparable in ERD and NERD.

Adults with Severe Psychiatric Symptoms in a Community Partial Hospitalization Program: Characteristics and Predictors of Clinical Response.

Mental health wellbeing is a critical element in the overall wellbeing of an individual. Severe mental health issues are directly connected with the individual's functioning and negatively impacts the quality of life. Inpatient psychiatric hospitalization does help significantly in stabilizing the acute serious mental health problems; however, the utility of community partial hospitalization program (PHP) has not been studied extensively. We undertook this study to assess the usefulness of community partial hospitalization program (PHP) in reducing severity of psychosomatic symptoms of patients; to study the epidemiology of the referred patients; and to elucidate the characteristics and predictors of psychosomatic symptom response. 164 patients were assessed by a baseline Behavioral and Symptom Identification Scale-32 (BASIS-32) at a tertiary healthcare center, out of which 82 patients subsequently followed up and were assessed using the same scale and the data was then stratified and compiled. Out of the initial 164 patients, at a 50% adherence rate, 13 patients showed an improvement greater than 30% with a significant co-relation to the race of the patients. Partial Hospitalization Program proved to be moderately effective in improving psychosomatic symptoms, with better results noticed in the White/Caucasian race. We need to consider several variables before generalizing this finding and more studies are needed in this area. However, we are able to highlight this valuable tool in addressing the severe mental health issues in a community-based populations.

Measurement of Irritability in Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Irritability is common among people who are physically ill, but a physical underpinning of irritability is not assessed by existing measures. A measure that assesses multidimensionality of irritability can help nurses and clinicians provide better care for people with cancer and, thus, reduce a risk for developing depression during cancer treatment. OBJECTIVES: We pilot tested a new measure, The Irritability Scale-Initial Version (TISi), for assessing irritability of cancer patients on three dimensions: physical, affective, and behavioral. METHODS: We conducted thee pilot studies to develop the 35-item TISi on a 5-point Likert scale. TISi was tested in 48 early-stage, nonmetastasized breast cancer patients at baseline (before) and 3 months (during chemotherapy). Of these patients, 62.5% received neoadjuvant and 37.5% received adjuvant chemotherapy, but none received hormonal treatment before or during the study. Measures of other correlates, including depression, anxiety, symptom distress, and social disconnectedness, were also administered, and biomarkers of hsCRP, TNF-α, IL-6, and BDNF were obtained from blood draws at both assessments. RESULTS: TISi has a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .97), satisfactory test-retest reliability (retest r = .69, intraclass correlation coefficient = .86), and moderate correlation with other constructs over time (r ≈ .40-.70). Its physical subscale significantly correlated with hsCRP (r = .32, p = .025) at baseline and TNF-α (r = .44, p = .002) at 3 months. A confirmatory factor analysis yields three factor loadings that are in line with conceptualization of the subscales. DISCUSSION: The findings support psychometric properties of TISi and its application for assessing cancer patients' irritability in multiple dimensions. Further investigation using a large study sample is necessary for improving construct and criterion validity and reducing item redundancy. CONCLUSION: TISi can be used to measure the level of irritability in cancer patients.

Longitudinally Measured Changes in Somnolence Severity With a Visual Analog Scale in a Randomized Lithium Versus Quetiapine-IR Study in Bipolar Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to use a visual analog scale (VAS) longitudinally measuring somnolence severity in patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: A data set of patients with bipolar spectrum disorders who were randomized to lithium or quetiapine-IR for 16 weeks was used. The somnolence severity was measured with a VAS from 0 to 100 (VAS based), and somnolence frequency was recorded according to incident report (incidence based) at each visit. The rates of VAS-based and incidence-based somnolence and changes in somnolence severity from baseline to the end of study were compared between the lithium and quetiapine groups. Longitudinal changes in somnolence severity were analyzed with linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 42 patients randomized, only 3 scored 0 on the VAS at baseline. The rates of incidence-based and VAS-based somnolence were similar in the lithium and quetiapine-IR groups. The VAS change scores from baseline to each visit varied in both groups with significant decreases at weeks 6 and 12 in the quetiapine-IR group only. The decrease at week 6 in the quetiapine-IR group was significantly different from that in the lithium group. Patterns of changes in somnolence severity were inconsistent in both groups. A significant interaction between time course and the decrease in VAS scores was observed in the quetiapine-IR group, but not in the lithium group. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline somnolence was highly prevalent in patients with bipolar disorder. The change in somnolence severity was different between lithium-treated and quetiapine-treated patients. Quantifying somnolence longitudinally is important in clinical trials and practice.

A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Lithium Versus Quetiapine Immediate Release Monotherapy in Patients With Bipolar Spectrum Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of lithium versus quetiapine immediate release (IR) monotherapy in patients with bipolar I, II, or subthreshold bipolar disorder at any phase. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to lithium or quetiapine IR for 16 weeks. The difference in the time to discontinuation from study due to "all causes" between lithium and quetiapine IR groups and changes from baseline to 8 and 16 weeks in depression, mania, anxiety, quality of life (QOL), metabolic profiles, and proinflammatory markers were compared. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients randomized to lithium (n = 18) and quetiapine IR (n = 24), the median time to discontinuation due to "all causes" was 6 weeks (95% confidence interval, 2-12 weeks) in the lithium group and 8 weeks (95% confidence interval, 6 weeks to not calculable) in the quetiapine IR group. The mean time to discontinuation due to "all causes" was 7.7 ± 1.1 weeks for lithium versus 8.4 ± 0.8 weeks for quetiapine IR (P = 0.54). There was no significant difference between lithium and quetiapine IR in changes in the severity of depression, mania/hypomania, anxiety, and QOL as a whole or only in patients with depressive index episode. The decrease in total cholesterol was significantly larger with lithium than with quetiapine IR (P = 0.05) as a whole, but not only in patients with depression index episode. There was no other significant difference in changes in metabolic panels and inflammatory markers between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in effectiveness between lithium and quetiapine IR monotherapy in a real-world bipolar population was minimal. Large-sample studies are needed to support or refute this finding.

Non-sustained microvolt level T-wave alternans in congenital long QT syndrome types 1 and 2.

BACKGROUND: Patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS) are predisposed to polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) during adrenergic stimulation. Microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) is linked to vulnerability to VT in structural heart disease. The prevalence of non-sustained MTWA (NS-MTWA) in LQTS is unknown. METHODS: 31 LQT1, 42 LQT2, and 80 controls underwent MTWA testing during exercise. MTWA tests were classified per standardized criteria, and re-analyzed according to the modified criteria to account for NS-MTWA. RESULTS: LQT1 and LQT2 patients had a significantly higher frequency of late NS-MTWA (26% and 12%) compared to controls (0%). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to sustained and early NS-MTWA. Late NS-MTWA was significantly associated with QTc. CONCLUSION: LQT1 and LQT2 patients had a higher prevalence of late NS-MTWA during exercise than matched controls. NS-MTWA likely reflects transient adrenergically mediated dispersion of repolarization, and could be a marker of arrhythmic risk in LQTS.

The Financial and Emotional Impact of Atopic Dermatitis on Children and Their Families.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the personal financial impact of atopic dermatitis (AD) and attempt to correlate cost of AD with emotional impact. STUDY DESIGN: Between March 2011 and December 2013, 82 caretakers of children 6 months to 12 years of age with moderate-to-severe AD were recruited at the time of dermatology clinic visits in Cleveland, Ohio, to complete surveys. The response rate was >95%. Participants were asked questions about direct expenses (medical visits, medications, and other products) and indirect expenses (time missed from work, childcare costs) related to AD in the past 4 weeks. Emotional impact was measured by the Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale. RESULTS: The mean monthly personal cost of AD in the month before the office visit was $274 (median $114; IQR $29, $276), with $75 from direct costs (median $45; IQR $20, $110) and $199 from indirect costs (median $0; IQR $0, $208). An average of 34.8% of available monthly money was spent on AD care in the month before the office visit. For patients with Medicaid, there was a significant correlation between monthly adjusted personal cost and Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale score (r = 0.548; P < .001); however, this correlation did not exist for patients who had commercial insurance (r = 0.269; P = .166). CONCLUSIONS: Our results illustrate the high emotional and financial burden of childhood AD and provide insight into spending patterns. In addition, our study correlate costs with emotional burden of AD for lower-income patients.

Association of Spirituality With Mental Health Conditions in Ohio National Guard Soldiers.

Research exploring spirituality in military populations is a relatively new field with limited published reports. This study used the Spiritual Well-Being Scale to examine the association of spiritual well-being with suicidal ideation/behavior, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and depression and alcohol use disorders in a randomized sample of Ohio Army National Guard soldiers. The participants were 418 soldiers, mostly white and male, with nearly three-quarters indicating that they had been deployed at least once during their careers. Higher spirituality, especially in the existential well-being subscale, was associated with significantly less lifetime PTSD, depression, and alcohol use disorders and with less suicidal ideation over the past year. Future research in this area may benefit from a longitudinal design that can assess spirituality and mental health behaviors in addition to diagnoses at different time points, to begin to explore spirituality in a larger context.

Does manual T-wave window adjustment affect microvolt T-wave alternans results in patients with structural heart disease?

INTRODUCTION: Microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) analysis can identify patients at low risk of sudden cardiac death who might not benefit from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Current spectral methodology for performing MTWA analysis may "miss" part of the T-wave in patients with QT prolongation. The value of T-wave window adjustment in patients with structural heart disease has not been studied. METHODS: We assembled MTWA data from 5 prior prospective studies including 170 patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, adjusted the T-wave window to include the entire T-wave, and reanalyzed MTWA. RESULTS: Of 170 patients, 43% required T-wave window adjustment. Only 3 of 170 patients (1.8%) had a clinically significant change in MTWA results. CONCLUSIONS: In 98.2% of patients, T-wave window adjustment did not improve the accuracy of MTWA analysis. Spectral MTWA as currently implemented remains effective for identifying patients with structural heart disease unlikely to benefit from ICD therapy.

New insights on acute expansion and longitudinal elongation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in vivo and at bench test: a note of caution on reliance to compliance charts and nominal length.

OBJECTIVES: We performed systematic optical coherence tomography (OCT) analyses after bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) implantation in a "real world" setting aiming at evaluating scaffold expansion and longitudinal integrity. BACKGROUND: a comprehensive elucidation of BVS acute performance in the "real-world" setting is lacking. METHODS: acute BVS expansion compared with compliance chart information and longitudinal integrity were assessed in 29 patients (32 lesions) by OCT. In addition, bench experiments with four scaffolds were performed with different combinations of deployment pressures and tube stiffness. RESULTS: scaffold underexpansion, using compliance chart information as reference, was observed in 97% of OCT cross-sections in vivo; however, only 8.3% of the cross-section analyzed revealed BVS area <5 mm(2) . Calcified plaques were more common in the lowest (9.7%) compared with the mid (8.8%) and highest (6.3%) tertiles of scaffold expansion (P = 0.003 and P = 0.001 for lowest vs. mid, and lowest vs. highest, respectively). Seventeen (54.8%) scaffolds were elongated during implantation, but no signs of scaffold fracture were revealed. Elongation and impaired expansion were reproduced in the bench testing when the scaffold was deployed with high pressure in a hard tube. CONCLUSIONS: compliance chart information should not be used to predict final BVS dimensions in the clinical setting. While BVS expansion could be potentially impaired by calcified plaques, they may elongate during deployment. Bench experiments confirmed the elongation phenomenon when BVS were deployed with high pressure in hard tubes.

Early response or nonresponse at week 2 and week 3 predict ultimate response or nonresponse in adolescents with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine: results from a 6-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

In adults with schizophrenia, early response/non-response (ER/ENR) to antipsychotics at 2 weeks robustly predicts ultimate response/non-response (UR/UNR). However, less data about the predictive value of ER/ENR exist in adolescents with schizophrenia. Post hoc analysis of a 6-week trial in adolescents aged 13-17 with schizophrenia were randomized 2:1 to olanzapine or placebo. ER was defined as ≥20 % reduction in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-children (BPRS-C) total score at week 2 (ER2) or 3 (ER3); UR was defined with increasing stringency as total BPRS-C score reduction ≥20, ≥30, ≥40 or ≥50 %; remission was defined cross-sectionally using Andreasen et al. (2005) criteria. By week 2 (n = 69) and 3 (n = 66), olanzapine-treated youth achieved 73.3 and 85.5 % of their overall BPRS-C score reduction at 6 weeks last observation carried forward. ER and ENR patients did not differ significantly regarding baseline demographic, illness and treatment variables. ER 2 (frequency = 68.1 %) and ER 3 (frequency = 65.2 %) significantly predicted UR and remission (p = 0.0044-p < 0.0001), with ER3 having more predictive power. A ≥ 20 % BPRS-C reduction threshold for ER had best predictive validity (area under the curve = 0.88-0.92). At 6 weeks, patients with ER had significantly greater improvements in BPRS-C, Clinical Global Impressions Improvement and Severity scores, greater cross-sectional remission and less all-cause discontinuation (p = 0.047-p < 0.0001). Adverse event profiles were similar in the ER and ENR groups. Adolescents with schizophrenia experienced the majority of symptomatic improvement early during olanzapine treatment. ER predicted UR and remission, with ER3 having best predictive power. A ≥ 20 % improvement threshold for defining ER was confirmed as a robust outcome indicator.

Differences in intracellular protein levels in monocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes between bipolar depressed patients and healthy controls: A pilot study with tyramine-based signal-amplified flow cytometry.

BACKGROUND: Molecular biomarkers for bipolar disorder (BD) that distinguish it from other manifestations of depressive symptoms remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if a very sensitive tyramine-based signal-amplification technology for flow cytometry (CellPrint™) could facilitate the identification of cell-specific analyte expression profiles of peripheral blood cells for bipolar depression (BPD) versus healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: The diagnosis of psychiatric disorders was ascertained with Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for DSM-5. Expression levels for eighteen protein analytes previously shown to be related to bipolar disorder were assessed with CellPrint™ in CD4+ T cells and monocytes of bipolar patients and HCs. Implementation of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and pathway analysis was subsequently used to identify new analytes and pathways for subsequent interrogations. RESULTS: Fourteen drug-naïve or -free patients with bipolar I or II depression and 17 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. The most distinguishable changes in analyte expression based on t-tests included GSK3ß, HMGB1, IRS2, phospho-GSK3αß, phospho-RELA, and TSPO in CD4+ T cells and calmodulin, GSK3ß, IRS2, and phospho-HS1 in monocytes. Subsequent PPI and pathway analysis indicated that prolactin, leptin, BDNF, and interleukin-3 signal pathways were significantly different between bipolar patients and HCs. LIMITATION: The sample size of the study was small and 2 patients were on medications. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, CellPrint™ was able to detect differences in cell-specific protein levels between BPD patients and HCs. A subsequent study including samples from patients with BPD, major depressive disorder, and HCs is warranted.

Lamotrigine as add-on treatment to lithium and divalproex: lessons learned from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in rapid-cycling bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVES: A substantial portion of the morbidity associated with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder (RCBD) stems from refractory depression. This study assessed the antidepressant effects of lamotrigine as compared with placebo when used as add-on therapy for rapid-cycling bipolar depression non-responsive to the combination of lithium plus divalproex. METHODS: During Phase 1 of this trial, hypomanic, manic, mixed, and/or depressed outpatients (n = 133) aged 18-65 years with DSM-IV RCBD type I or II were initially treated with the open combination of lithium and divalproex for up to 16 weeks. During Phase 2, subjects who did not meet the criteria for stabilization (n = 49) (i.e., remained in or cycled into the depressed phase) were randomly assigned to double-blind, adjunctive lamotrigine (n = 23) or adjunctive placebo (n = 26). The primary endpoint was the mean change in depression symptom severity from the beginning of Phase 2 to the end of Phase 2 (week 12) on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Data were analyzed by analysis of covariance with last observation carried forward and a mixed-models analysis. RESULTS: During Phase 1, a high rate of study discontinuations occurred due to intolerable side effects (13/133; 10%) and study non-adherence (22/133; 17%). Only 14% (19/133) stabilized on the open combination of lithium and divalproex. Among the 49 (37%) patients randomized to the double-blind adjunctive treatment phase, mean ± standard error change from baseline on the MADRS total score was -8.5 ± 1.7 points for lamotrigine and -9.1 ± 1.5 points for placebo (p = not significant; mixed-models analysis). No significant differences were observed in the rates of response, remission, or bimodal response between lamotrigine and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The poor tolerability, lack of efficacy, and high rate of early discontinuation with the combination of lithium and divalproex suggests this regimen was ineffective for the majority of patients with RCBD. Among patients who did not stabilize on lithium and divalproex, the addition of lamotrigine was no more effective than placebo in reducing depression severity. The findings suggest an opportunity for several design modifications to enhance signal detection in future trials of RCBD. The main limitation is the small number of subjects randomized to double-blind treatment.

Health-related quality of life as measured by the child health questionnaire in adolescents with bipolar disorder treated with olanzapine.

AIM: To examine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adolescents with bipolar disorder before and after double-blind treatment with olanzapine or placebo. METHODS: Parents or legal guardians of 160 adolescents with a manic or mixed episode associated with bipolar I disorder were asked to rate their child's health using the Child Health Questionnaire-Parental Form 50 at baseline, before receiving medication, and then again at the end of participation in a 3-week double-blind placebo-controlled study of olanzapine. RESULTS: Adolescents in both treatment groups began and ended the study with significantly lower scores than normalized values of healthy peers on several HRQoL subscales (lower ratings indicate more impaired functioning), especially those assessing psychosocial factors. However, participants receiving olanzapine exhibited greater improvement than those in the placebo group across multiple HRQoL subscales, including the Behavior, Family activities, and Mental health subscales. Reduction in manic symptoms was associated with improvement in HRQoL values. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, manic adolescents with bipolar disorder exhibit abnormalities in psychosocial, rather than physical factors associated with HRQoL. Treatment with olanzapine had a greater effect on multiple domains of psychosocial functioning compared with placebo, suggesting that in addition to improving manic symptoms, pharmacologic interventions may lessen some of psychosocial deficits experienced by adolescents with bipolar disorder. However, following 3 weeks of treatment, adolescents with bipolar disorder continued to exhibit deficits in several aspects of psychosocial functioning, indicating that additional pharmacologic and psychosocial interventions may be necessary to further improve functional outcome.

Associations Among Irritability, High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein/Interleukin-6, and Depression in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Association between irritability and depression has been frequently reported, but the nature of this association in the adult population is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: We examined associations among irritability (e.g., a feeling of agitation), inflammatory biomarkers, and depression during chemotherapy. METHODS: Forty-four patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of chemotherapy on The Irritability Scale-Initial Version, severity and new onset of depressive symptoms using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and serum levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin 6. RESULTS: At baseline, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein significantly correlated with physical and mood subscales of The Irritability Scale-Initial Version, but not with depression. Irritability and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein significantly predicted the severity and new onset of moderate to severe depressive symptoms over time, while irritability and interleukin 6 significantly predicted new onset of moderate to severe depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that irritability is an independent risk factor of depression and associated with increasing high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Irritability needs to be effectively managed in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy to prevent them from developing depressive symptoms. These preliminary findings should be investigated in future large-sample studies.

Protein Biomarkers in Monocytes and CD4+ Lymphocytes for Predicting Lithium Treatment Response of Bipolar Disorder: a Feasibility Study with Tyramine-Based Signal-Amplified Flow Cytometry.

Purpose: To determine if enhanced flow cytometry (CellPrint™) can identify intracellular proteins of lithium responsiveness in monocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes from patients with bipolar disorder. Methods: Eligible bipolar I or II patients were openly treated with lithium for 16-weeks. Baseline levels of Bcl2, BDNF, calmodulin, Fyn, phospho-Fyn/phospho-Yes, GSK3ß, phospho-GSK3αß, HMGB1, iNOS, IRS2, mTor, NLPR3, PGM1, PKA C-α, PPAR-γ, phospho-RelA, and TPH1 in monocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes of lithium responders and non-responders were measured with CellPrint™. Their utility of discriminating responders from non-responders was explored. Protein-protein network and pathway enrichment analyses were conducted. Results: Of the 24 intent-to-treat patients, 12 patients completed the 16-week study. Eleven of 13 responders and 8 of 11 non-responders were available for this analysis. The levels of the majority of analytes in lithium responders were lower than non-responders in both cell types, but only the level of GSK3ß in monocytes was significantly different (p = 0.034). The combination of GSK3ß and phospho-GSK3αß levels in monocytes correctly classified 11/11 responders and 5/8 non-responders. Combination of GSK3ß, phospho-RelA, TPH1 and PGM1 correctly classified 10/11 responders and 6/7 non-responders, both with a likelihood of ≥ 85%. Prolactin, leptin, BDNF, neurotrophin, and epidermal growth factor/epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways are involved in the lithium treatment response. GSK3ß and RelA genes are involved in 4 of 5 these pathways. Conclusion: CellPrint™ flow cytometry was able to detect differences in multiple proteins in monocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes between lithium responders and non-responders. A large study is warranted to confirm or refute these findings.

Comparisons of the tolerability and sensitivity of quetiapine-XR in the acute treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar mania, bipolar depression, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder.

Quetiapine extended-release (quetiapine-XR) has been studied in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar mania, bipolar depression, major depressive disorder (MDD), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). The purpose of this study was to compare the tolerability and sensitivity of quetiapine-XR among these psychiatric conditions. The discontinuation due to adverse events (DAEs) and reported somnolence in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of quetiapine-XR in these psychiatric conditions were examined. The absolute risk reduction or increase and the number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) or harm (NNTH) for DAEs and reported somnolence of quetiapine-XR ≥ 300 mg/d relative to placebo were estimated. Data from one study in schizophrenia (n=465), one in mania (n=316), one in bipolar depression (n=280), two in refractory MDD (n=624), two in MDD (n=669) and three in GAD (n=1109) were available. The risk for DAEs of quetiapine-XR relative to placebo was significantly increased in bipolar depression (NNTH=9), refractory MDD (NNTH=8), MDD (NNTH=9), and GAD (NNTH=5), but not in schizophrenia and mania. The risk for reported somnolence of quetiapine-XR relative to placebo was significantly increased in schizophrenia (600 mg/d NNTH=15 and 800 mg/d NNTH=11), mania (NNTH=8), bipolar depression (NNTH=4), refractory MDD (NNTH=5), MDD (NNTH=5) and GAD (NNTH=5). These results suggest that patients with GAD had the poorest tolerability during treatment with quetiapine-XR, but they had a similar sensitivity as those with bipolar depression and MDD. Patients with schizophrenia or mania had a higher tolerability and a lower sensitivity than those with bipolar depression, MDD, or GAD.

Safety and efficacy of olanzapine monotherapy in treatment-resistant bipolar mania: a 12-week open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and efficacy of olanzapine monotherapy in treatment-resistant bipolar mania. METHOD: Subjects (n = 18) who were acutely manic, did not respond to lithium, anticonvulsants, and neuroleptics, and/or had intolerable side effects to them in previous manic episodes were openly treated with olanzapine monotherapy (5-40 mg/d) for 12 weeks. The primary and secondary outcomes included the change from baseline to endpoint in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score, Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder-Severity Scale (CGI-S), 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and response and remission rate. RESULTS: The mean change in YMRS total score from baseline to endpoint was -23.3 ± 8.4 (p < 0.001). Fifteen (88.5%) patients achieved response (≥50% reduction in YMRS total score) and 14 (77.8%) achieved remission (YMRS total score ≤9 at endpoint). Mean changes from baseline to endpoint in CGI-S for mania and PANSS total score were significant, but not the changes in HAM-D total score or CGI-S for depression. The most common adverse events were sedation, self-reported weight gain, ≥7% increase in body weight, dizziness, and akathisia. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that olanzapine monotherapy is effective and relatively safe in patients with treatment-resistant bipolar mania. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is warranted.

No association between chronic use of ranitidine, compared with omeprazole or famotidine, and gastrointestinal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: In 2019, the United States Food and Drug Administration detected above-regulation levels of the human carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in ranitidine, resulting in a complete removal of the medication from the market. NDMA is known to cause gastrointestinal malignancies in animal models. AIM: To determine if patients who were receiving ranitidine have a higher risk of developing cancers of the digestive tract compared to patients taking other anti-reflux medications. METHODS: Using the nationwide database IBM Explorys, patients taking ranitidine were compared to patients on either famotidine or omeprazole. Incidence data of new malignancies of the oesophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, and colon/rectum were obtained in 1-year intervals for up to 10 years. Two multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), one adjusting for common risk factors for each cancer studied, and the other for demographic factors. RESULTS: Patients on ranitidine who were compared to patients on famotidine had ORs of 0.51(95% CI 0.43-0.60), 0.43(95% CI 0.36-0.51), 0.39(95% CI 0.36-0.41), 0.54(95% CI 0.49-0.62), and 0.46(95% CI 0.43-0.49) of developing oesophageal, gastric, hepatocellular, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients on ranitidine compared to omeprazole had ORs of 0.62(95% CI 0.52-0.72), 0.58(95% CI 0.49-0.68), 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.86), 0.68(95% CI 0.60-0.76), and 0.66(95% CI 0.62-0.70) of developing oesophageal, gastric, hepatocellular, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of ranitidine was not associated with an increased odds of developing gastrointestinal malignancies compared to omeprazole or famotidine use.

A pilot randomized clinical trial of a teamwork intervention for heart failure care dyads.

BACKGROUND: Dyadic heart failure (HF) management can improve outcomes for patients and caregivers and can be enhanced through eHealth interventions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an eHealth dyadic teamwork intervention, compared to an attention control condition. METHODS: We recruited 29 HF patient-caregiver dyads from inpatient units and randomized dyads to an intervention or a control group. We calculated enrollment and retention rates, described acceptability using interview and questionnaire data, and computed intervention effect sizes. RESULTS: 37% of eligible dyads agreed to participate and 93% of randomized participants completed follow-up questionnaires. Participants found both study conditions to be acceptable. Between-group effect sizes suggested that the intervention led to improvements in relationship quality, self-efficacy, and quality of life for patients and caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Dyadic recruitment from acute care settings is challenging. Findings provide initial evidence that our intervention can contribute to better health outcomes for HF dyads.